Who wrote 2.6.28

Who wrote 2.6.28

[Wang Chen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1611 bytes --]

As Jonathon and Greg did, I also made a statistic about who wrote the Linux kernel.
The following data is for 2.6.28 development. (http://www.remword.com/kps_result/)

1. The attachment graph "commit.png" shows the change of commit amount of patches and changed lines.
   It seems that 2.6.28 has less commits than 2.6.27 of both patch set and changed lines.

2. The attachment graph "who.png" shows the involved developers and employers in each version of kernel.
   It seems that 2.6.28 has more developers and companies involved than previous two versions, but
   less than that of 2.6.25. From a long vision, more and more developers and companies join to the
   development of Linux kernel, but the increase speed is not so fast.

3. About TOP30 employers who commit most to kernel, (http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_28_emtop)
   Hobbyists is still the most group who contribute most to kernel development.

4. About longtail, (http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_28_lt)
   There are 624 people who committed less than 2 patch sets, but their contribution is about 8%
   of total.

5. About Reviewed-by and Tested-by.
   More and more review and test efforts are regarded by people, Tested-by sign number(173)
   is highest in kernel development history.

6. Anyone who wants to check some person or company's contribution curve, please use
   http://remword.com/kps_result/evolvement.php

BTW:
To collect information about developers' employ relationship, I search on the Internet
(not by asking themselves) and use gitdm-config which is created by Jonathon and Greg.
Thanks Jonathon and Greg :)

--
WCN



[-- Attachment #2: who.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 5533 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #3: commit.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 7005 bytes --]

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Kristoffer Ericson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2003 bytes --]

On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:18:47 +0800
Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> As Jonathon and Greg did, I also made a statistic about who wrote the Linux kernel.
> The following data is for 2.6.28 development. (http://www.remword.com/kps_result/)
> 
> 1. The attachment graph "commit.png" shows the change of commit amount of patches and changed lines.
>    It seems that 2.6.28 has less commits than 2.6.27 of both patch set and changed lines.
> 
> 2. The attachment graph "who.png" shows the involved developers and employers in each version of kernel.
>    It seems that 2.6.28 has more developers and companies involved than previous two versions, but
>    less than that of 2.6.25. From a long vision, more and more developers and companies join to the
>    development of Linux kernel, but the increase speed is not so fast.

How about adjusting for large/small letters? eg. Kristoffer Ericson == kristoffer ericson. Or Ill just learn to use the same always :)



> 
> 3. About TOP30 employers who commit most to kernel, (http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_28_emtop)
>    Hobbyists is still the most group who contribute most to kernel development.
> 
> 4. About longtail, (http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_28_lt)
>    There are 624 people who committed less than 2 patch sets, but their contribution is about 8%
>    of total.
> 
> 5. About Reviewed-by and Tested-by.
>    More and more review and test efforts are regarded by people, Tested-by sign number(173)
>    is highest in kernel development history.
> 
> 6. Anyone who wants to check some person or company's contribution curve, please use
>    http://remword.com/kps_result/evolvement.php
> 
> BTW:
> To collect information about developers' employ relationship, I search on the Internet
> (not by asking themselves) and use gitdm-config which is created by Jonathon and Greg.
> Thanks Jonathon and Greg :)
> 
> --
> WCN
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Wang Chen]

Kristoffer Ericson said the following on 2009-1-9 1:53:
> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:18:47 +0800
> Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
>> As Jonathon and Greg did, I also made a statistic about who wrote the Linux kernel.
>> The following data is for 2.6.28 development. (http://www.remword.com/kps_result/)
>>
>> 1. The attachment graph "commit.png" shows the change of commit amount of patches and changed lines.
>>    It seems that 2.6.28 has less commits than 2.6.27 of both patch set and changed lines.
>>
>> 2. The attachment graph "who.png" shows the involved developers and employers in each version of kernel.
>>    It seems that 2.6.28 has more developers and companies involved than previous two versions, but
>>    less than that of 2.6.25. From a long vision, more and more developers and companies join to the
>>    development of Linux kernel, but the increase speed is not so fast.
> 
> How about adjusting for large/small letters? eg. Kristoffer Ericson == kristoffer ericson. Or Ill just learn to use the same always :)
> 

Good advice.
I've changed all the Email address to lower case.
Thank you.

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Jaswinder Singh Rajput]

On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> As Jonathon and Greg did, I also made a statistic about who wrote the Linux kernel.
> The following data is for 2.6.28 development. (http://www.remword.com/kps_result/)
>
> 1. The attachment graph "commit.png" shows the change of commit amount of patches and changed lines.
>   It seems that 2.6.28 has less commits than 2.6.27 of both patch set and changed lines.
>
> 2. The attachment graph "who.png" shows the involved developers and employers in each version of kernel.
>   It seems that 2.6.28 has more developers and companies involved than previous two versions, but
>   less than that of 2.6.25. From a long vision, more and more developers and companies join to the
>   development of Linux kernel, but the increase speed is not so fast.
>

In http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_29_whole_line.html
Earlier I was using email address: Jaswinder Singh
<jaswinder@infradead.org> (Unknown #25) and now I am using:
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> (Unknown #25)

If possible can you link above two emails.

Thanks
--
JSR

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[David Miller]

From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:39:17 +0530

> In http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_29_whole_line.html
> Earlier I was using email address: Jaswinder Singh
> <jaswinder@infradead.org> (Unknown #25) and now I am using:
> Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> (Unknown #25)
> 
> If possible can you link above two emails.

This reminds me that I noticed another one that needs linking,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org became shemminger@vyatta.com

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Theodore Tso]

On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:11:24PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:39:17 +0530
> 
> > In http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_29_whole_line.html
> > Earlier I was using email address: Jaswinder Singh
> > <jaswinder@infradead.org> (Unknown #25) and now I am using:
> > Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> (Unknown #25)
> > 
> > If possible can you link above two emails.
> 
> This reminds me that I noticed another one that needs linking,
> shemminger@linux-foundation.org became shemminger@vyatta.com

... and most of the engineers listed as working for the Linux
Foundation in the above-mentioned analysis don't....

							- Ted

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Greg KH]

On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 04:31:21PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:11:24PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
> > Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:39:17 +0530
> > 
> > > In http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_29_whole_line.html
> > > Earlier I was using email address: Jaswinder Singh
> > > <jaswinder@infradead.org> (Unknown #25) and now I am using:
> > > Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> (Unknown #25)
> > > 
> > > If possible can you link above two emails.
> > 
> > This reminds me that I noticed another one that needs linking,
> > shemminger@linux-foundation.org became shemminger@vyatta.com
> 
> ... and most of the engineers listed as working for the Linux
> Foundation in the above-mentioned analysis don't....

If you look at the tool that Jon wrote, and the data files that I keep
up to date, this is already handled there.

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Pavel Machek]

On Fri 2009-01-09 14:11:24, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:39:17 +0530
> 
> > In http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_29_whole_line.html
> > Earlier I was using email address: Jaswinder Singh
> > <jaswinder@infradead.org> (Unknown #25) and now I am using:
> > Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> (Unknown #25)
> > 
> > If possible can you link above two emails.
> 
> This reminds me that I noticed another one that needs linking,
> shemminger@linux-foundation.org became shemminger@vyatta.com

Hmmm, should those go to linux/.mailmap ? Heh, add pavel@ucw.cz ==
 pavel@suse.cz ....

									Pavel

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Wang Chen]

Jaswinder Singh Rajput said the following on 2009-1-9 22:09:
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> As Jonathon and Greg did, I also made a statistic about who wrote the Linux kernel.
>> The following data is for 2.6.28 development. (http://www.remword.com/kps_result/)
>>
>> 1. The attachment graph "commit.png" shows the change of commit amount of patches and changed lines.
>>   It seems that 2.6.28 has less commits than 2.6.27 of both patch set and changed lines.
>>
>> 2. The attachment graph "who.png" shows the involved developers and employers in each version of kernel.
>>   It seems that 2.6.28 has more developers and companies involved than previous two versions, but
>>   less than that of 2.6.25. From a long vision, more and more developers and companies join to the
>>   development of Linux kernel, but the increase speed is not so fast.
>>
> 
> In http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_29_whole_line.html
> Earlier I was using email address: Jaswinder Singh
> <jaswinder@infradead.org> (Unknown #25) and now I am using:
> Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> (Unknown #25)
> 
> If possible can you link above two emails.
> 

Sure. Will fix.
Thanks Jaswinder.

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Wang Chen]

David Miller said the following on 2009-1-10 6:11:
> From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:39:17 +0530
> 
>> In http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_29_whole_line.html
>> Earlier I was using email address: Jaswinder Singh
>> <jaswinder@infradead.org> (Unknown #25) and now I am using:
>> Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> (Unknown #25)
>>
>> If possible can you link above two emails.
> 
> This reminds me that I noticed another one that needs linking,
> shemminger@linux-foundation.org became shemminger@vyatta.com
> 

Thanks Dave.
But I wonder that whether Stephen still be LF people.
If not, I will separate these two addresses to different employers.

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Wang Chen]

Greg KH said the following on 2009-1-11 6:00:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 04:31:21PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 02:11:24PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:39:17 +0530
>>>
>>>> In http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_29_whole_line.html
>>>> Earlier I was using email address: Jaswinder Singh
>>>> <jaswinder@infradead.org> (Unknown #25) and now I am using:
>>>> Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> (Unknown #25)
>>>>
>>>> If possible can you link above two emails.
>>> This reminds me that I noticed another one that needs linking,
>>> shemminger@linux-foundation.org became shemminger@vyatta.com
>> ... and most of the engineers listed as working for the Linux
>> Foundation in the above-mentioned analysis don't....
> 

Thanks Ted and Greg.

Ted, when you said this, do you mean the page "all_whole.html"?
If so, my explanation is that this page lists all the people who
ever worked for TLF since 2.6.13 age.
Is there any mistake?

If you mean the page "2_6_29_whole.html".
Here are only four people be listed:
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com> \\working for vyatta now?
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> \\redhat engineer

I will fix that.

> If you look at the tool that Jon wrote, and the data files that I keep
> up to date, this is already handled there.
> 
> thanks,
> 

Greg, I've used your gitdm-config-2.6. And don't see any update, where should
I find your latest work?

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Wang Chen]

Pavel Machek said the following on 2009-1-12 2:30:
> On Fri 2009-01-09 14:11:24, David Miller wrote:
>> From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:39:17 +0530
>>
>>> In http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_29_whole_line.html
>>> Earlier I was using email address: Jaswinder Singh
>>> <jaswinder@infradead.org> (Unknown #25) and now I am using:
>>> Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> (Unknown #25)
>>>
>>> If possible can you link above two emails.
>> This reminds me that I noticed another one that needs linking,
>> shemminger@linux-foundation.org became shemminger@vyatta.com
> 
> Hmmm, should those go to linux/.mailmap ? Heh, add pavel@ucw.cz ==
>  pavel@suse.cz ....
> 

It's already done by my statistic tool by following merge code:
	CONV_PER_ITEM("<pavel@ucw.cz>",
			"<pavel@suse.cz>", "Novell"),
	CONV_PER_ITEM("<pavel@pavel@suse.cz>",
			"<pavel@suse.cz>", "Novell"),
	CONV_PER_ITEM("<pavel@suse.de>",
			"<pavel@suse.cz>", "Novell"),
	CONV_PER_ITEM("<pavel@suze.cz>",
			"<pavel@suse.cz>", "Novell"),
seems you've used some typo addresses in history ;)

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Greg KH]

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:03:50AM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
> > If you look at the tool that Jon wrote, and the data files that I keep
> > up to date, this is already handled there.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> 
> Greg, I've used your gitdm-config-2.6. And don't see any update, where should
> I find your latest work?

No, I haven't, sorry.  I need to push out a new update soon.  Hm,
gitdm-config?  Did I release that?  If so, where?

thanks,

greg k-h

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Wang Chen]

Greg KH said the following on 2009-1-12 12:09:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:03:50AM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
>>> If you look at the tool that Jon wrote, and the data files that I keep
>>> up to date, this is already handled there.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>> Greg, I've used your gitdm-config-2.6. And don't see any update, where should
>> I find your latest work?
> 
> No, I haven't, sorry.  I need to push out a new update soon.  Hm,
> gitdm-config?  Did I release that?  If so, where?
> 

Here
http://lwn.net/images/gitdm/

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Stephen Hemminger]

My Linux Foundation mail address still works, and I can still have
access to old software at my account there. But as of Decemeber 2007,
I work for Vyatta.  The marketing department would like the attribution
in statistics to be Vyatta, it is not a big issue for me.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Wang Chen" <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: jaswinderlinux@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de, corbet@lwn.net, "Stephen Hemminger" <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 5:51:22 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

David Miller said the following on 2009-1-10 6:11:
> From: "Jaswinder Singh Rajput" <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:39:17 +0530
> 
>> In http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_29_whole_line.html
>> Earlier I was using email address: Jaswinder Singh
>> <jaswinder@infradead.org> (Unknown #25) and now I am using:
>> Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> (Unknown #25)
>>
>> If possible can you link above two emails.
> 
> This reminds me that I noticed another one that needs linking,
> shemminger@linux-foundation.org became shemminger@vyatta.com
> 

Thanks Dave.
But I wonder that whether Stephen still be LF people.
If not, I will separate these two addresses to different employers.

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Jonathan Corbet]

On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:04:52 +0800
Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> > No, I haven't, sorry.  I need to push out a new update soon.  Hm,
> > gitdm-config?  Did I release that?  If so, where?
> >   
> 
> Here
> http://lwn.net/images/gitdm/

I put out a sanitized version of the database the better part of a year
ago.  "Sanitized" because we asked a number of developers about their
affiliation with the promise that we would not spread that information
further.  I make an updated version; will do, but can't promise it
before LCA.

jon

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Theodore Tso]

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:03:50AM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
> 
> Ted, when you said this, do you mean the page "all_whole.html"?
> If so, my explanation is that this page lists all the people who
> ever worked for TLF since 2.6.13 age.
> Is there any mistake?

I can't remember for certain which one I was looking at; it might have
been 2._6_26_whole_line.html or 2.6.27's whole_line.html:

# No.1 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> 42263
# No.2 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 1165
# No.3 Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> 42
# No.4 Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> 35
# No.5 Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> 14

Of the above technically only Linus Torvalds is an _employee_ of the
Linux Foundation.  I'm technically an employee of IBM, but I'm on loan
to the Linux Foundation.

One of the things which get confusing is that people's employers
change over time, so if you are mapping engineers to company, it's not
enough to use just an e-mail address and map it to a company name;
ideally you need to take an e-mail address and/or name and date range,
and then map that to a compay name.  For example Alan Cox was
previously at Red Hat, but he will be changing employers to Intel as
of some date in January, 2009, but he will be keeping his e-mail
address.

							- Ted

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Jonathan Corbet]

On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:49:27 -0500
Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:

> One of the things which get confusing is that people's employers
> change over time, so if you are mapping engineers to company, it's not
> enough to use just an e-mail address and map it to a company name;
> ideally you need to take an e-mail address and/or name and date range,
> and then map that to a compay name.  For example Alan Cox was
> previously at Red Hat, but he will be changing employers to Intel as
> of some date in January, 2009, but he will be keeping his e-mail
> address.

FWIW, the gitdm code handles that just fine.  Of course, it does
require keeping the database current, which is always a challenge. 

jon

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Wang Chen]

Jonathan Corbet said the following on 2009-1-12 23:54:
> On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:04:52 +0800
> Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
>>> No, I haven't, sorry.  I need to push out a new update soon.  Hm,
>>> gitdm-config?  Did I release that?  If so, where?
>>>   
>> Here
>> http://lwn.net/images/gitdm/
> 
> I put out a sanitized version of the database the better part of a year
> ago.  "Sanitized" because we asked a number of developers about their
> affiliation with the promise that we would not spread that information
> further.  I make an updated version; will do, but can't promise it
> before LCA.
> 

I will update my database with your latest one.
Before that, I can only still use my "unsanitized" data :)

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Wang Chen]

Theodore Tso said the following on 2009-1-13 1:49:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:03:50AM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
>> Ted, when you said this, do you mean the page "all_whole.html"?
>> If so, my explanation is that this page lists all the people who
>> ever worked for TLF since 2.6.13 age.
>> Is there any mistake?
> 
> I can't remember for certain which one I was looking at; it might have
> been 2._6_26_whole_line.html or 2.6.27's whole_line.html:
> 
> # No.1 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> 42263
> # No.2 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> 1165
> # No.3 Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> 42
> # No.4 Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org> 35
> # No.5 Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> 14
> 
> Of the above technically only Linus Torvalds is an _employee_ of the
> Linux Foundation.  I'm technically an employee of IBM, but I'm on loan
> to the Linux Foundation.
> 

Thanks Ted.
I will update my database.

> One of the things which get confusing is that people's employers
> change over time, so if you are mapping engineers to company, it's not
> enough to use just an e-mail address and map it to a company name;
> ideally you need to take an e-mail address and/or name and date range,
> and then map that to a compay name.  For example Alan Cox was
> previously at Red Hat, but he will be changing employers to Intel as
> of some date in January, 2009, but he will be keeping his e-mail
> address.
> 

Yes. This is in my todo list.

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Wang Chen]

Stephen Hemminger said the following on 2009-1-12 23:45:
> My Linux Foundation mail address still works, and I can still have
> access to old software at my account there. But as of Decemeber 2007,
> I work for Vyatta.  The marketing department would like the attribution
> in statistics to be Vyatta, it is not a big issue for me.
> 

I see now.
Will fix.
Thanks Stephen.

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Jaswinder Singh Rajput]

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Jaswinder Singh Rajput said the following on 2009-1-9 22:09:
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>> As Jonathon and Greg did, I also made a statistic about who wrote the Linux kernel.
>>> The following data is for 2.6.28 development. (http://www.remword.com/kps_result/)
>>>
>>> 1. The attachment graph "commit.png" shows the change of commit amount of patches and changed lines.
>>>   It seems that 2.6.28 has less commits than 2.6.27 of both patch set and changed lines.
>>>
>>> 2. The attachment graph "who.png" shows the involved developers and employers in each version of kernel.
>>>   It seems that 2.6.28 has more developers and companies involved than previous two versions, but
>>>   less than that of 2.6.25. From a long vision, more and more developers and companies join to the
>>>   development of Linux kernel, but the increase speed is not so fast.
>>>
>>
>> In http://remword.com/kps_result/2_6_29_whole_line.html
>> Earlier I was using email address: Jaswinder Singh
>> <jaswinder@infradead.org> (Unknown #25) and now I am using:
>> Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com> (Unknown #25)
>>
>> If possible can you link above two emails.
>>
>
> Sure. Will fix.

Now it is showing 3 names for Jaswinder.

Can you please also fix this:

1. Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>  --> Jaswinder
Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
2. Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>  --> Jaswinder Singh
Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>

Thanks
--
JSR

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Jonathan Corbet]

On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:09:27 -0800
Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:03:50AM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
> > > If you look at the tool that Jon wrote, and the data files that I
> > > keep up to date, this is already handled there.
> > > 
> > > thanks,
> > > 
> > 
> > Greg, I've used your gitdm-config-2.6. And don't see any update,
> > where should I find your latest work?
> 
> No, I haven't, sorry.  I need to push out a new update soon.  Hm,
> gitdm-config?  Did I release that?  If so, where?

OK, for the curious, I've put out an updated version of the gitdm
configuration database:

	http://lwn.net/images/gitdm/gitdm-config-2.6.28.tar.bz2

As always, the current version of gitdm can be pulled from:

	git://git.lwn.net/gitdm.git

It's *still* an ugly hack, but maybe it's slowly getting better...:)

jon

Re: Who wrote 2.6.28

[Kristoffer Ericson]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1425 bytes --]

On Fri, 09 Jan 2009 17:07:39 +0800
Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:

> Kristoffer Ericson said the following on 2009-1-9 1:53:
> > On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:18:47 +0800
> > Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> As Jonathon and Greg did, I also made a statistic about who wrote the Linux kernel.
> >> The following data is for 2.6.28 development. (http://www.remword.com/kps_result/)
> >>
> >> 1. The attachment graph "commit.png" shows the change of commit amount of patches and changed lines.
> >>    It seems that 2.6.28 has less commits than 2.6.27 of both patch set and changed lines.
> >>
> >> 2. The attachment graph "who.png" shows the involved developers and employers in each version of kernel.
> >>    It seems that 2.6.28 has more developers and companies involved than previous two versions, but
> >>    less than that of 2.6.25. From a long vision, more and more developers and companies join to the
> >>    development of Linux kernel, but the increase speed is not so fast.
> > 
> > How about adjusting for large/small letters? eg. Kristoffer Ericson == kristoffer ericson. Or Ill just learn to use the same always :)
> > 
> 
> Good advice.
> I've changed all the Email address to lower case.
> Thank you.

Also, i previously used "kristoffer_e1@hotmail.com" so please merge that email
with my current.

-- 
Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]