linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@infradead.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	utrace-devel <utrace-devel@redhat.com>,
	Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
	Maneesh Soni <maneesh@in.ibm.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 4/7] Uprobes Implementation
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:01:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100112020155.GC10869@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100111122553.22050.46895.sendpatchset@srikar.in.ibm.com>

On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 05:55:53PM +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Uprobes Implementation
> 
> Uprobes Infrastructure enables user to dynamically establish
> probepoints in user applications and collect information by executing
> a handler functions when the probepoints are hit.
> Please refer Documentation/uprobes.txt for more details.
> 
> This patch provides the core implementation of uprobes.
> This patch builds on utrace infrastructure.
> 
> You need to follow this up with the uprobes patch for your
> architecture.

Good to see this!!!  Several questions interspersed below.

							Thanx, Paul

> Signed-off-by: Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/Kconfig            |   12 
>  include/linux/uprobes.h |  292 ++++++
>  kernel/Makefile         |    1 
>  kernel/uprobes_core.c   | 2017 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 2322 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: new_uprobes.git/arch/Kconfig
> ===================================================================
> --- new_uprobes.git.orig/arch/Kconfig
> +++ new_uprobes.git/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -66,6 +66,16 @@ config UBP
>  	  in user applications. This service is used by components
>  	  such as uprobes. If in doubt, say "N".
> 
> +config UPROBES
> +	bool "User-space probes (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> +	depends on UTRACE && MODULES && UBP
> +	depends on HAVE_UPROBES
> +	help
> +	  Uprobes enables kernel modules to establish probepoints
> +	  in user applications and execute handler functions when
> +	  the probepoints are hit. For more information, refer to
> +	  Documentation/uprobes.txt. If in doubt, say "N".
> +
>  config HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
>  	bool
>  	help
> @@ -115,6 +125,8 @@ config HAVE_KPROBES
>  config HAVE_KRETPROBES
>  	bool
> 
> +config HAVE_UPROBES
> +	def_bool n
>  #
>  # An arch should select this if it provides all these things:
>  #
> Index: new_uprobes.git/include/linux/uprobes.h
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null
> +++ new_uprobes.git/include/linux/uprobes.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,292 @@
> +#ifndef _LINUX_UPROBES_H
> +#define _LINUX_UPROBES_H
> +/*
> + * Userspace Probes (UProbes)
> + * include/linux/uprobes.h
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) IBM Corporation, 2006, 2009
> + */
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +
> +struct pt_regs;
> +
> +/* This is what the user supplies us. */
> +struct uprobe {
> +	/*
> +	 * The pid of the probed process.  Currently, this can be the
> +	 * thread ID (task->pid) of any active thread in the process.
> +	 */
> +	pid_t pid;
> +
> +	/* Location of the probepoint */
> +	unsigned long vaddr;
> +
> +	/* Handler to run when the probepoint is hit */
> +	void (*handler)(struct uprobe*, struct pt_regs*);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * This function, if non-NULL, will be called upon completion of
> +	 * an ASYNCHRONOUS registration (i.e., one initiated by a uprobe
> +	 * handler).  reg = 1 for register, 0 for unregister.
> +	 */
> +	void (*registration_callback)(struct uprobe *u, int reg, int result);
> +
> +	/* Reserved for use by uprobes */
> +	void *kdata;
> +};
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_UPROBES)
> +extern int register_uprobe(struct uprobe *u);
> +extern void unregister_uprobe(struct uprobe *u);
> +#else
> +static inline int register_uprobe(struct uprobe *u)
> +{
> +	return -ENOSYS;
> +}
> +static inline void unregister_uprobe(struct uprobe *u)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif	/* CONFIG_UPROBES */
> +
> +#ifdef UPROBES_IMPLEMENTATION
> +
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/rwsem.h>
> +#include <linux/wait.h>
> +#include <asm/atomic.h>
> +#include <linux/ubp.h>
> +#include <linux/ubp_xol.h>
> +#include <asm/uprobes.h>
> +
> +struct utrace_engine;
> +struct task_struct;
> +struct pid;
> +
> +enum uprobe_probept_state {
> +	UPROBE_INSERTING,	/* process quiescing prior to insertion	*/
> +	UPROBE_BP_SET,		/* breakpoint in place			*/
> +	UPROBE_REMOVING,	/* process quiescing prior to removal	*/
> +	UPROBE_DISABLED		/* removal completed			*/
> +};
> +
> +enum uprobe_task_state {
> +	UPTASK_QUIESCENT,
> +	UPTASK_SLEEPING,	/* See utask_fake_quiesce(). 		*/
> +	UPTASK_RUNNING,
> +	UPTASK_BP_HIT,
> +	UPTASK_SSTEP
> +};
> +
> +enum uprobe_ssil_state {
> +	SSIL_DISABLE,
> +	SSIL_CLEAR,
> +	SSIL_SET
> +};
> +
> +#define UPROBE_HASH_BITS 5
> +#define UPROBE_TABLE_SIZE (1 << UPROBE_HASH_BITS)
> +
> +/*
> + * uprobe_process -- not a user-visible struct.
> + * A uprobe_process represents a probed process.  A process can have
> + * multiple probepoints (each represented by a uprobe_probept) and
> + * one or more threads (each represented by a uprobe_task).
> + */
> +struct uprobe_process {
> +	/*
> +	 * rwsem is write-locked for any change to the uprobe_process's
> +	 * graph (including uprobe_tasks, uprobe_probepts, and uprobe_kimgs) --
> +	 * e.g., due to probe [un]registration or special events like exit.
> +	 * It's read-locked during the whole time we process a probepoint hit.
> +	 */
> +	struct rw_semaphore rwsem;
> +
> +	/* Table of uprobe_probepts registered for this process */
> +	/* TODO: Switch to list_head[] per Ingo. */
> +	struct hlist_head uprobe_table[UPROBE_TABLE_SIZE];
> +
> +	/* List of uprobe_probepts awaiting insertion or removal */
> +	struct list_head pending_uprobes;
> +
> +	/* List of uprobe_tasks in this task group */
> +	struct list_head thread_list;
> +	int nthreads;
> +	int n_quiescent_threads;
> +
> +	/* this goes on the uproc_table */
> +	struct hlist_node hlist;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * All threads (tasks) in a process share the same uprobe_process.
> +	 */
> +	struct pid *tg_leader;
> +	pid_t tgid;
> +
> +	/* Threads in UTASK_SLEEPING state wait here to be roused. */
> +	wait_queue_head_t waitq;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We won't free the uprobe_process while...
> +	 * - any register/unregister operations on it are in progress; or
> +	 * - any uprobe_report_* callbacks are running; or
> +	 * - uprobe_table[] is not empty; or
> +	 * - any tasks are UTASK_SLEEPING in the waitq;
> +	 * refcount reflects this.  We do NOT ref-count tasks (threads),
> +	 * since once the last thread has exited, the rest is academic.
> +	 */
> +	atomic_t refcount;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * finished = 1 means the process is execing or the last thread
> +	 * is exiting, and we're cleaning up the uproc.  If the execed
> +	 * process is probed, a new uproc will be created.
> +	 */
> +	bool finished;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * 1 to single-step out of line; 0 for inline.  This can drop to
> +	 * 0 if we can't set up the XOL area, but never goes from 0 to 1.
> +	 */
> +	bool sstep_out_of_line;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Manages slots for instruction-copies to be single-stepped
> +	 * out of line.
> +	 */
> +	void *xol_area;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * uprobe_kimg -- not a user-visible struct.
> + * Holds implementation-only per-uprobe data.
> + * uprobe->kdata points to this.
> + */
> +struct uprobe_kimg {
> +	struct uprobe *uprobe;
> +	struct uprobe_probept *ppt;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * -EBUSY while we're waiting for all threads to quiesce so the
> +	 * associated breakpoint can be inserted or removed.
> +	 * 0 if the the insert/remove operation has succeeded, or -errno
> +	 * otherwise.
> +	 */
> +	int status;
> +
> +	/* on ppt's list */
> +	struct list_head list;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * uprobe_probept -- not a user-visible struct.
> + * A probepoint, at which several uprobes can be registered.
> + * Guarded by uproc->rwsem.
> + */
> +struct uprobe_probept {
> +	/* breakpoint/XOL details */
> +	struct ubp_bkpt ubp;
> +
> +	/* The uprobe_kimg(s) associated with this uprobe_probept */
> +	struct list_head uprobe_list;
> +
> +	enum uprobe_probept_state state;
> +
> +	/* The parent uprobe_process */
> +	struct uprobe_process *uproc;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * ppt goes in the uprobe_process->uprobe_table when registered --
> +	 * even before the breakpoint has been inserted.
> +	 */
> +	struct hlist_node ut_node;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * ppt sits in the uprobe_process->pending_uprobes queue while
> +	 * awaiting insertion or removal of the breakpoint.
> +	 */
> +	struct list_head pd_node;
> +
> +	/* [un]register_uprobe() waits 'til bkpt inserted/removed */
> +	wait_queue_head_t waitq;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * ssil_lock, ssilq and ssil_state are used to serialize
> +	 * single-stepping inline, so threads don't clobber each other
> +	 * swapping the breakpoint instruction in and out.  This helps
> +	 * prevent crashing the probed app, but it does NOT prevent
> +	 * probe misses while the breakpoint is swapped out.
> +	 * ssilq - threads wait for their chance to single-step inline.
> +	 */
> +	spinlock_t ssil_lock;
> +	wait_queue_head_t ssilq;
> +	enum uprobe_ssil_state ssil_state;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * uprobe_utask -- not a user-visible struct.
> + * Corresponds to a thread in a probed process.
> + * Guarded by uproc->rwsem.
> + */
> +struct uprobe_task {
> +	/* Lives in the global utask_table */
> +	struct hlist_node hlist;
> +
> +	/* Lives on the thread_list for the uprobe_process */
> +	struct list_head list;
> +
> +	struct task_struct *tsk;
> +	struct pid *pid;
> +
> +	/* The utrace engine for this task */
> +	struct utrace_engine *engine;
> +
> +	/* Back pointer to the associated uprobe_process */
> +	struct uprobe_process *uproc;
> +
> +	enum uprobe_task_state state;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * quiescing = 1 means this task has been asked to quiesce.
> +	 * It may not be able to comply immediately if it's hit a bkpt.
> +	 */
> +	bool quiescing;
> +
> +	/* Set before running handlers; cleared after single-stepping. */
> +	struct uprobe_probept *active_probe;
> +
> +	/* Saved address of copied original instruction */
> +	long singlestep_addr;
> +
> +	struct ubp_task_arch_info arch_info;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Unexpected error in probepoint handling has left task's
> +	 * text or stack corrupted.  Kill task ASAP.
> +	 */
> +	bool doomed;
> +
> +	/* [un]registrations initiated by handlers must be asynchronous. */
> +	struct list_head deferred_registrations;
> +
> +	/* Delay handler-destined signals 'til after single-step done. */
> +	struct list_head delayed_signals;
> +};
> +
> +#endif	/* UPROBES_IMPLEMENTATION */
> +
> +#endif	/* _LINUX_UPROBES_H */
> Index: new_uprobes.git/kernel/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- new_uprobes.git.orig/kernel/Makefile
> +++ new_uprobes.git/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT) += hw_b
>  obj-$(CONFIG_USER_RETURN_NOTIFIER) += user-return-notifier.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_UBP) += ubp_core.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_UBP_XOL) += ubp_xol.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes_core.o
> 
>  ifneq ($(CONFIG_SCHED_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER),y)
>  # According to Alan Modra <alan@linuxcare.com.au>, the -fno-omit-frame-pointer is
> Index: new_uprobes.git/kernel/uprobes_core.c
> ===================================================================
> --- /dev/null
> +++ new_uprobes.git/kernel/uprobes_core.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,2017 @@
> +/*
> + *  Userspace Probes (UProbes)
> + *  kernel/uprobes_core.c
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + *
> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) IBM Corporation, 2006, 2009
> + */
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/hash.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/kref.h>
> +#include <linux/utrace.h>
> +#include <linux/regset.h>
> +#define UPROBES_IMPLEMENTATION 1
> +#include <linux/uprobes.h>
> +#include <linux/tracehook.h>
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/mman.h>
> +
> +#define UPROBE_SET_FLAGS	1
> +#define UPROBE_CLEAR_FLAGS	0
> +
> +#define MAX_XOL_SLOTS	1024
> +
> +static int utask_fake_quiesce(struct uprobe_task *utask);
> +static int uprobe_post_ssout(struct uprobe_task *utask,
> +	struct uprobe_probept *ppt, struct pt_regs *regs);
> +
> +typedef void (*uprobe_handler_t)(struct uprobe*, struct pt_regs*);
> +
> +/*
> + * Table of currently probed processes, hashed by task-group leader's
> + * struct pid.
> + */
> +static struct hlist_head uproc_table[UPROBE_TABLE_SIZE];
> +
> +/* Protects uproc_table during uprobe (un)registration */
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(uproc_mutex);
> +
> +/* Table of uprobe_tasks, hashed by task_struct pointer. */
> +static struct hlist_head utask_table[UPROBE_TABLE_SIZE];
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(utask_table_lock);
> +
> +/* p_uprobe_utrace_ops = &uprobe_utrace_ops.  Fwd refs are a pain w/o this. */
> +static const struct utrace_engine_ops *p_uprobe_utrace_ops;
> +
> +struct deferred_registration {
> +	struct list_head list;
> +	struct uprobe *uprobe;
> +	int regflag;	/* 0 - unregister, 1 - register */
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Calling a signal handler cancels single-stepping, so uprobes delays
> + * calling the handler, as necessary, until after single-stepping is completed.
> + */
> +struct delayed_signal {
> +	struct list_head list;
> +	siginfo_t info;
> +};
> +
> +static u16 ubp_strategies;
> +
> +static struct uprobe_task *uprobe_find_utask(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +	struct hlist_head *head;
> +	struct hlist_node *node;
> +	struct uprobe_task *utask;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	head = &utask_table[hash_ptr(tsk, UPROBE_HASH_BITS)];
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&utask_table_lock, flags);
> +	hlist_for_each_entry(utask, node, head, hlist) {
> +		if (utask->tsk == tsk) {
> +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&utask_table_lock, flags);
> +			return utask;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&utask_table_lock, flags);
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static void uprobe_hash_utask(struct uprobe_task *utask)
> +{
> +	struct hlist_head *head;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&utask->hlist);
> +	head = &utask_table[hash_ptr(utask->tsk, UPROBE_HASH_BITS)];
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&utask_table_lock, flags);
> +	hlist_add_head(&utask->hlist, head);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&utask_table_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static void uprobe_unhash_utask(struct uprobe_task *utask)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&utask_table_lock, flags);
> +	hlist_del(&utask->hlist);
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&utask_table_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void uprobe_get_process(struct uprobe_process *uproc)
> +{
> +	atomic_inc(&uproc->refcount);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Decrement uproc's refcount in a situation where we "know" it can't
> + * reach zero.  It's OK to call this with uproc locked.  Compare with
> + * uprobe_put_process().
> + */
> +static inline void uprobe_decref_process(struct uprobe_process *uproc)
> +{
> +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&uproc->refcount))
> +		BUG();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Runs with the uproc_mutex held.  Returns with uproc ref-counted and
> + * write-locked.
> + *
> + * Around exec time, briefly, it's possible to have one (finished) uproc
> + * for the old image and one for the new image.  We find the latter.
> + */
> +static struct uprobe_process *uprobe_find_process(struct pid *tg_leader)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_process *uproc;
> +	struct hlist_head *head;
> +	struct hlist_node *node;
> +
> +	head = &uproc_table[hash_ptr(tg_leader, UPROBE_HASH_BITS)];
> +	hlist_for_each_entry(uproc, node, head, hlist) {
> +		if (uproc->tg_leader == tg_leader && !uproc->finished) {
> +			uprobe_get_process(uproc);
> +			down_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +			return uproc;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * In the given uproc's hash table of probepoints, find the one with the
> + * specified virtual address.  Runs with uproc->rwsem locked.
> + */
> +static struct uprobe_probept *uprobe_find_probept(struct uprobe_process *uproc,
> +		unsigned long vaddr)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_probept *ppt;
> +	struct hlist_node *node;
> +	struct hlist_head *head = &uproc->uprobe_table[hash_long(vaddr,
> +		UPROBE_HASH_BITS)];
> +
> +	hlist_for_each_entry(ppt, node, head, ut_node) {
> +		if (ppt->ubp.vaddr == vaddr && ppt->state != UPROBE_DISABLED)
> +			return ppt;
> +	}
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Save a copy of the original instruction (so it can be single-stepped
> + * out of line), insert the breakpoint instruction, and awake
> + * register_uprobe().
> + */
> +static void uprobe_insert_bkpt(struct uprobe_probept *ppt,
> +						struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_kimg *uk;
> +	int result;
> +
> +	if (tsk)
> +		result = ubp_insert_bkpt(tsk, &ppt->ubp);
> +	else
> +		/* No surviving tasks associated with ppt->uproc */
> +		result = -ESRCH;
> +	ppt->state = (result ? UPROBE_DISABLED : UPROBE_BP_SET);
> +	list_for_each_entry(uk, &ppt->uprobe_list, list)
> +		uk->status = result;
> +	wake_up_all(&ppt->waitq);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Check if task has just stepped on a trap instruction at the
> + * indicated address. If it has indeed stepped on that address,
> + * then reset Instruction Pointer for the task.
> + *
> + * tsk should either be current thread or already quiesced thread.
> + */
> +static inline void reset_thread_ip(struct task_struct *tsk,
> +				struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long addr)
> +{
> +	if ((ubp_get_bkpt_addr(regs) == addr) &&
> +				!test_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_SINGLESTEP))
> +		ubp_set_ip(regs, addr);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * ppt's breakpoint has been removed.  If any threads are in the middle of
> + * single-stepping at this probepoint, fix things up so they can proceed.
> + * If any threads have just hit breakpoint but are yet to start
> + * pre-processing, reset their instruction pointers.
> + *
> + * Runs with all of ppt->uproc's threads quiesced and ppt->uproc->rwsem
> + * write-locked
> + */
> +static inline void adjust_trapped_thread_ip(struct uprobe_probept *ppt)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_process *uproc = ppt->uproc;
> +	struct uprobe_task *utask;
> +	struct pt_regs *regs;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(utask, &uproc->thread_list, list) {
> +		regs = task_pt_regs(utask->tsk);
> +		if (utask->active_probe != ppt) {
> +			reset_thread_ip(utask->tsk, regs, ppt->ubp.vaddr);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Current thread cannot have an active breakpoint
> +		 * and still request for a breakpoint removal. The
> +		 * above case is handled by utask_fake_quiesce().
> +		 */
> +		BUG_ON(utask->tsk == current);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_UBP_XOL
> +		if (instruction_pointer(regs) == ppt->ubp.xol_vaddr)
> +			/* adjust the ip to breakpoint addr.  */
> +			ubp_set_ip(regs, ppt->ubp.vaddr);
> +		else
> +			/* adjust the ip to next instruction.  */
> +			uprobe_post_ssout(utask, ppt, regs);
> +#endif
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void uprobe_remove_bkpt(struct uprobe_probept *ppt,
> +						struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +	if (tsk) {
> +		if (ubp_remove_bkpt(tsk, &ppt->ubp) != 0) {
> +			printk(KERN_ERR
> +				"Error removing uprobe at pid %d vaddr %#lx:"
> +				" can't restore original instruction\n",
> +				tsk->tgid, ppt->ubp.vaddr);
> +			/*
> +			 * This shouldn't happen, since we were previously
> +			 * able to write the breakpoint at that address.
> +			 * There's not much we can do besides let the
> +			 * process die with a SIGTRAP the next time the
> +			 * breakpoint is hit.
> +			 */
> +		}
> +		adjust_trapped_thread_ip(ppt);
> +		if (ppt->ubp.strategy & UBP_HNT_INLINE) {
> +			unsigned long flags;
> +			spin_lock_irqsave(&ppt->ssil_lock, flags);
> +			ppt->ssil_state = SSIL_DISABLE;
> +			wake_up_all(&ppt->ssilq);
> +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ppt->ssil_lock, flags);
> +		}
> +	}
> +	/* Wake up unregister_uprobe(). */
> +	ppt->state = UPROBE_DISABLED;
> +	wake_up_all(&ppt->waitq);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Runs with all of uproc's threads quiesced and uproc->rwsem write-locked.
> + * As specified, insert or remove the breakpoint instruction for each
> + * uprobe_probept on uproc's pending list.
> + * tsk = one of the tasks associated with uproc -- NULL if there are
> + * no surviving threads.
> + * It's OK for uproc->pending_uprobes to be empty here.  It can happen
> + * if a register and an unregister are requested (by different probers)
> + * simultaneously for the same pid/vaddr.
> + */
> +static void handle_pending_uprobes(struct uprobe_process *uproc,
> +	struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_probept *ppt, *tmp;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(ppt, tmp, &uproc->pending_uprobes, pd_node) {
> +		switch (ppt->state) {
> +		case UPROBE_INSERTING:
> +			uprobe_insert_bkpt(ppt, tsk);
> +			break;
> +		case UPROBE_REMOVING:
> +			uprobe_remove_bkpt(ppt, tsk);
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			BUG();
> +		}
> +		list_del(&ppt->pd_node);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void utask_adjust_flags(struct uprobe_task *utask, int set,
> +	unsigned long flags)
> +{
> +	unsigned long newflags, oldflags;
> +
> +	oldflags = utask->engine->flags;
> +	newflags = oldflags;
> +	if (set)
> +		newflags |= flags;
> +	else
> +		newflags &= ~flags;
> +	/*
> +	 * utrace_barrier[_pid] is not appropriate here.  If we're
> +	 * adjusting current, it's not needed.  And if we're adjusting
> +	 * some other task, we're holding utask->uproc->rwsem, which
> +	 * could prevent that task from completing the callback we'd
> +	 * be waiting on.
> +	 */
> +	if (newflags != oldflags) {
> +		if (utrace_set_events_pid(utask->pid, utask->engine,
> +							newflags) != 0)
> +			/* We don't care. */
> +			;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static inline void clear_utrace_quiesce(struct uprobe_task *utask, bool resume)
> +{
> +	utask_adjust_flags(utask, UPROBE_CLEAR_FLAGS, UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE));
> +	if (resume) {
> +		if (utrace_control_pid(utask->pid, utask->engine,
> +						UTRACE_RESUME) != 0)
> +			/* We don't care. */
> +			;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/* Opposite of quiesce_all_threads().  Same locking applies. */
> +static void rouse_all_threads(struct uprobe_process *uproc)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_task *utask;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(utask, &uproc->thread_list, list) {
> +		if (utask->quiescing) {
> +			utask->quiescing = false;
> +			if (utask->state == UPTASK_QUIESCENT) {
> +				utask->state = UPTASK_RUNNING;
> +				uproc->n_quiescent_threads--;
> +				clear_utrace_quiesce(utask, true);
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +	/* Wake any threads that decided to sleep rather than quiesce. */
> +	wake_up_all(&uproc->waitq);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * If all of uproc's surviving threads have quiesced, do the necessary
> + * breakpoint insertions or removals, un-quiesce everybody, and return 1.
> + * tsk is a surviving thread, or NULL if there is none.  Runs with
> + * uproc->rwsem write-locked.
> + */
> +static int check_uproc_quiesced(struct uprobe_process *uproc,
> +		struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +	if (uproc->n_quiescent_threads >= uproc->nthreads) {
> +		handle_pending_uprobes(uproc, tsk);
> +		rouse_all_threads(uproc);
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* Direct the indicated thread to quiesce. */
> +static void uprobe_stop_thread(struct uprobe_task *utask)
> +{
> +	int result;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * As with utask_adjust_flags, calling utrace_barrier_pid below
> +	 * could deadlock.
> +	 */
> +	BUG_ON(utask->tsk == current);
> +	result = utrace_control_pid(utask->pid, utask->engine, UTRACE_STOP);
> +	if (result == 0) {
> +		/* Already stopped. */
> +		utask->state = UPTASK_QUIESCENT;
> +		utask->uproc->n_quiescent_threads++;
> +	} else if (result == -EINPROGRESS) {
> +		if (utask->tsk->state & TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Task could be in interruptible wait for a long
> +			 * time -- e.g., if stopped for I/O.  But we know
> +			 * it's not going to run user code before all
> +			 * threads quiesce, so pretend it's quiesced.
> +			 * This avoids terminating a system call via
> +			 * UTRACE_INTERRUPT.
> +			 */
> +			utask->state = UPTASK_QUIESCENT;
> +			utask->uproc->n_quiescent_threads++;
> +		} else {
> +			/*
> +			 * Task will eventually stop, but it may be a long time.
> +			 * Don't wait.
> +			 */
> +			result = utrace_control_pid(utask->pid, utask->engine,
> +							UTRACE_INTERRUPT);
> +			if (result != 0)
> +				/* We don't care. */
> +				;
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Quiesce all threads in the specified process -- e.g., prior to
> + * breakpoint insertion.  Runs with uproc->rwsem write-locked.
> + * Returns false if all threads have died.
> + */
> +static bool quiesce_all_threads(struct uprobe_process *uproc,
> +		struct uprobe_task **cur_utask_quiescing)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_task *utask;
> +	struct task_struct *survivor = NULL;    /* any survivor */
> +	bool survivors = false;
> +
> +	*cur_utask_quiescing = NULL;
> +	list_for_each_entry(utask, &uproc->thread_list, list) {
> +		if (!survivors) {
> +			survivor = pid_task(utask->pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
> +			if (survivor)
> +				survivors = true;
> +		}
> +		if (!utask->quiescing) {
> +			/*
> +			 * If utask is currently handling a probepoint, it'll
> +			 * check utask->quiescing and quiesce when it's done.
> +			 */
> +			utask->quiescing = true;
> +			if (utask->tsk == current)
> +				*cur_utask_quiescing = utask;
> +			else if (utask->state == UPTASK_RUNNING) {
> +				utask_adjust_flags(utask, UPROBE_SET_FLAGS,
> +						UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE));
> +				uprobe_stop_thread(utask);
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +	/*
> +	 * If all the (other) threads are already quiesced, it's up to the
> +	 * current thread to do the necessary work.
> +	 */
> +	check_uproc_quiesced(uproc, survivor);
> +	return survivors;
> +}
> +
> +/* Called with utask->uproc write-locked. */
> +static void uprobe_free_task(struct uprobe_task *utask, bool in_callback)
> +{
> +	struct deferred_registration *dr, *d;
> +	struct delayed_signal *ds, *ds2;
> +	int result;
> +
> +	if (utask->engine && (utask->tsk != current || !in_callback)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * No other tasks in this process should be running
> +		 * uprobe_report_* callbacks.  (If they are, utrace_barrier()
> +		 * here could deadlock.)
> +		 */
> +		result = utrace_control_pid(utask->pid, utask->engine,
> +							UTRACE_DETACH);
> +		BUG_ON(result == -EINPROGRESS);
> +	}
> +	put_pid(utask->pid);	/* null pid OK */
> +
> +	uprobe_unhash_utask(utask);
> +	list_del(&utask->list);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(dr, d, &utask->deferred_registrations, list) {
> +		list_del(&dr->list);
> +		kfree(dr);
> +	}
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(ds, ds2, &utask->delayed_signals, list) {
> +		list_del(&ds->list);
> +		kfree(ds);
> +	}
> +
> +	kfree(utask);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Dismantle uproc and all its remaining uprobe_tasks.
> + * in_callback = 1 if the caller is a uprobe_report_* callback who will
> + * handle the UTRACE_DETACH operation.
> + * Runs with uproc_mutex held; called with uproc->rwsem write-locked.
> + */
> +static void uprobe_free_process(struct uprobe_process *uproc, int in_callback)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_task *utask, *tmp;
> +
> +	if (!hlist_unhashed(&uproc->hlist))
> +		hlist_del(&uproc->hlist);
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(utask, tmp, &uproc->thread_list, list)
> +		uprobe_free_task(utask, in_callback);
> +	put_pid(uproc->tg_leader);
> +	if (uproc->xol_area)
> +		xol_put_area(uproc->xol_area);
> +	up_write(&uproc->rwsem);	/* So kfree doesn't complain */
> +	kfree(uproc);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Decrement uproc's ref count.  If it's zero, free uproc and return
> + * 1.  Else return 0.  If uproc is locked, don't call this; use
> + * uprobe_decref_process().
> + */
> +static int uprobe_put_process(struct uprobe_process *uproc, bool in_callback)
> +{
> +	int freed = 0;
> +
> +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&uproc->refcount)) {
> +		mutex_lock(&uproc_mutex);
> +		down_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +		if (unlikely(atomic_read(&uproc->refcount) != 0)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * The works because uproc_mutex is held any
> +			 * time the ref count can go from 0 to 1 -- e.g.,
> +			 * register_uprobe() sneaks in with a new probe.
> +			 */
> +			up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +		} else {
> +			uprobe_free_process(uproc, in_callback);
> +			freed = 1;
> +		}
> +		mutex_unlock(&uproc_mutex);
> +	}
> +	return freed;
> +}
> +
> +static struct uprobe_kimg *uprobe_mk_kimg(struct uprobe *u)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_kimg *uk = kzalloc(sizeof *uk,
> +		GFP_USER);
> +
> +	if (unlikely(!uk))
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +	u->kdata = uk;
> +	uk->uprobe = u;
> +	uk->ppt = NULL;
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&uk->list);
> +	uk->status = -EBUSY;
> +	return uk;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Allocate a uprobe_task object for p and add it to uproc's list.
> + * Called with p "got" and uproc->rwsem write-locked.  Called in one of
> + * the following cases:
> + * - before setting the first uprobe in p's process
> + * - we're in uprobe_report_clone() and p is the newly added thread
> + * Returns:
> + * - pointer to new uprobe_task on success
> + * - NULL if t dies before we can utrace_attach it
> + * - negative errno otherwise
> + */
> +static struct uprobe_task *uprobe_add_task(struct pid *p,
> +		struct uprobe_process *uproc)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_task *utask;
> +	struct utrace_engine *engine;
> +	struct task_struct *t = pid_task(p, PIDTYPE_PID);

What keeps the task_struct referenced by "t" from disappearing at this
point?

> +
> +	if (!t)
> +		return NULL;
> +	utask = kzalloc(sizeof *utask, GFP_USER);
> +	if (unlikely(utask == NULL))
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +	utask->pid = p;
> +	utask->tsk = t;
> +	utask->state = UPTASK_RUNNING;
> +	utask->quiescing = false;
> +	utask->uproc = uproc;
> +	utask->active_probe = NULL;
> +	utask->doomed = false;
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&utask->deferred_registrations);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&utask->delayed_signals);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&utask->list);
> +	list_add_tail(&utask->list, &uproc->thread_list);
> +	uprobe_hash_utask(utask);
> +
> +	engine = utrace_attach_pid(p, UTRACE_ATTACH_CREATE,
> +						p_uprobe_utrace_ops, utask);
> +	if (IS_ERR(engine)) {
> +		long err = PTR_ERR(engine);
> +		printk("uprobes: utrace_attach_task failed, returned %ld\n",
> +									err);
> +		uprobe_free_task(utask, 0);
> +		if (err == -ESRCH)
> +			return NULL;
> +		return ERR_PTR(err);
> +	}
> +	utask->engine = engine;
> +	/*
> +	 * Always watch for traps, clones, execs and exits. Caller must
> +	 * set any other engine flags.
> +	 */
> +	utask_adjust_flags(utask, UPROBE_SET_FLAGS,
> +			UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL) | UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL_IGN) |
> +			UTRACE_EVENT(SIGNAL_CORE) | UTRACE_EVENT(EXEC) |
> +			UTRACE_EVENT(CLONE) | UTRACE_EVENT(EXIT));
> +	/*
> +	 * Note that it's OK if t dies just after utrace_attach, because
> +	 * with the engine in place, the appropriate report_* callback
> +	 * should handle it after we release uproc->rwsem.
> +	 */
> +	utrace_engine_put(engine);
> +	return utask;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * start_pid is the pid for a thread in the probed process.  Find the
> + * next thread that doesn't have a corresponding uprobe_task yet.  Return
> + * a ref-counted pid for that task, if any, else NULL.
> + */
> +static struct pid *find_next_thread_to_add(struct uprobe_process *uproc,
> +						struct pid *start_pid)
> +{
> +	struct task_struct *t, *start;
> +	struct uprobe_task *utask;
> +	struct pid *pid = NULL;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	start = pid_task(start_pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
> +	t = start;
> +	if (t) {
> +		do {
> +			if (unlikely(t->flags & PF_EXITING))
> +				goto dont_add;
> +			list_for_each_entry(utask, &uproc->thread_list, list) {

Doesn't this need to be list_for_each_entry_rcu()?

Or do you have ->thread_list protected elsewise?

> +				if (utask->tsk == t)
> +					/* Already added */
> +					goto dont_add;
> +			}
> +			/* Found thread/task to add. */
> +			pid = get_pid(task_pid(t));
> +			break;
> +dont_add:
> +			t = next_thread(t);
> +		} while (t != start);
> +	}
> +	rcu_read_unlock();

Now that we are outside of rcu_read_lock()'s protection, the task
indicated by "pid" might disappear, and the value of "pid" might well
be reused.  Is this really OK?

> +	return pid;
> +}
> +
> +/* Runs with uproc_mutex held; returns with uproc->rwsem write-locked. */
> +static struct uprobe_process *uprobe_mk_process(struct pid *tg_leader)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_process *uproc;
> +	struct uprobe_task *utask;
> +	struct pid *add_me;
> +	int i;
> +	long err;
> +
> +	uproc = kzalloc(sizeof *uproc, GFP_USER);
> +	if (unlikely(uproc == NULL))
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +	/* Initialize fields */
> +	atomic_set(&uproc->refcount, 1);
> +	init_rwsem(&uproc->rwsem);
> +	down_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +	init_waitqueue_head(&uproc->waitq);
> +	for (i = 0; i < UPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++)
> +		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&uproc->uprobe_table[i]);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&uproc->pending_uprobes);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&uproc->thread_list);
> +	uproc->nthreads = 0;
> +	uproc->n_quiescent_threads = 0;
> +	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&uproc->hlist);
> +	uproc->tg_leader = get_pid(tg_leader);
> +	uproc->tgid = pid_task(tg_leader, PIDTYPE_PID)->tgid;
> +	uproc->finished = false;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_UBP_XOL
> +	if (!(ubp_strategies & UBP_HNT_INLINE))
> +		uproc->sstep_out_of_line = true;
> +	else
> +#endif
> +		uproc->sstep_out_of_line = false;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Create and populate one utask per thread in this process.  We
> +	 * can't call uprobe_add_task() while holding RCU lock, so we:
> +	 *	1. rcu_read_lock()
> +	 *	2. Find the next thread, add_me, in this process that's not
> +	 *	already on uproc's thread_list.
> +	 *	3. rcu_read_unlock()
> +	 *	4. uprobe_add_task(add_me, uproc)
> +	 *	Repeat 1-4 'til we have utasks for all threads.
> +	 */
> +	add_me = tg_leader;
> +	while ((add_me = find_next_thread_to_add(uproc, add_me)) != NULL) {
> +		utask = uprobe_add_task(add_me, uproc);
> +		if (IS_ERR(utask)) {
> +			err = PTR_ERR(utask);
> +			goto fail;
> +		}
> +		if (utask)
> +			uproc->nthreads++;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (uproc->nthreads == 0) {
> +		/* All threads -- even p -- are dead. */
> +		err = -ESRCH;
> +		goto fail;
> +	}
> +	return uproc;
> +
> +fail:
> +	uprobe_free_process(uproc, 0);
> +	return ERR_PTR(err);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Creates a uprobe_probept and connects it to uk and uproc.  Runs with
> + * uproc->rwsem write-locked.
> + */
> +static struct uprobe_probept *uprobe_add_probept(struct uprobe_kimg *uk,
> +	struct uprobe_process *uproc)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_probept *ppt;
> +
> +	ppt = kzalloc(sizeof *ppt, GFP_USER);
> +	if (unlikely(ppt == NULL))
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +	init_waitqueue_head(&ppt->waitq);
> +	init_waitqueue_head(&ppt->ssilq);
> +	spin_lock_init(&ppt->ssil_lock);
> +	ppt->ssil_state = SSIL_CLEAR;
> +
> +	/* Connect to uk. */
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ppt->uprobe_list);
> +	list_add_tail(&uk->list, &ppt->uprobe_list);
> +	uk->ppt = ppt;
> +	uk->status = -EBUSY;
> +	ppt->ubp.vaddr = uk->uprobe->vaddr;
> +	ppt->ubp.xol_vaddr = 0;
> +
> +	/* Connect to uproc. */
> +	if (!uproc->sstep_out_of_line)
> +		ppt->ubp.strategy = UBP_HNT_INLINE;
> +	else
> +		ppt->ubp.strategy = ubp_strategies;
> +	ppt->state = UPROBE_INSERTING;
> +	ppt->uproc = uproc;
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ppt->pd_node);
> +	list_add_tail(&ppt->pd_node, &uproc->pending_uprobes);
> +	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&ppt->ut_node);
> +	hlist_add_head(&ppt->ut_node,
> +			&uproc->uprobe_table[hash_long(ppt->ubp.vaddr,
> +			UPROBE_HASH_BITS)]);
> +	uprobe_get_process(uproc);
> +	return ppt;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Runs with ppt->uproc write-locked.  Frees ppt and decrements the ref
> + * count on ppt->uproc (but ref count shouldn't hit 0).
> + */
> +static void uprobe_free_probept(struct uprobe_probept *ppt)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_process *uproc = ppt->uproc;
> +
> +	xol_free_insn_slot(ppt->ubp.xol_vaddr, uproc->xol_area);
> +	hlist_del(&ppt->ut_node);
> +	kfree(ppt);
> +	uprobe_decref_process(uproc);
> +}
> +
> +static void uprobe_free_kimg(struct uprobe_kimg *uk)
> +{
> +	uk->uprobe->kdata = NULL;
> +	kfree(uk);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Runs with uprobe_process write-locked.
> + * Note that we never free uk->uprobe, because the user owns that.
> + */
> +static void purge_uprobe(struct uprobe_kimg *uk)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_probept *ppt = uk->ppt;
> +
> +	list_del(&uk->list);
> +	uprobe_free_kimg(uk);
> +	if (list_empty(&ppt->uprobe_list))
> +		uprobe_free_probept(ppt);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Runs with utask->uproc locked.
> + * read lock if called from uprobe handler.
> + * else write lock.
> + * Returns -EINPROGRESS on success.
> + * Returns -EBUSY if a request for defer registration already exists.
> + * Returns 0 if we have deferred request for both register/unregister.
> + *
> + */
> +static int defer_registration(struct uprobe *u, int regflag,
> +		struct uprobe_task *utask)
> +{
> +	struct deferred_registration *dr, *d;
> +
> +	/* Check if we already have such a defer request */
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(dr, d, &utask->deferred_registrations, list) {
> +		if (dr->uprobe == u) {
> +			if (dr->regflag != regflag) {
> +				/* same as successful register + unregister */
> +				list_del(&dr->list);
> +				kfree(dr);
> +				return 0;
> +			} else
> +				/* we already have identical request */
> +				return -EBUSY;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/* We have a new unique request */
> +	dr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct deferred_registration), GFP_USER);
> +	if (!dr)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	dr->uprobe = u;
> +	dr->regflag = regflag;
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dr->list);
> +	list_add_tail(&dr->list, &utask->deferred_registrations);
> +	return -EINPROGRESS;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Given a numeric thread ID, return a ref-counted struct pid for the
> + * task-group-leader thread.
> + */
> +static struct pid *uprobe_get_tg_leader(pid_t p)
> +{
> +	struct pid *pid = NULL;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	if (current->nsproxy)
> +		pid = find_vpid(p);
> +	if (pid) {
> +		struct task_struct *t = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
> +		if (t)
> +			pid = task_tgid(t);
> +		else
> +			pid = NULL;
> +	}
> +	rcu_read_unlock();

What happens if the thread disappears at this point?  We are outside of
rcu_read_lock() protection, so all the structures could potentially be
freed up by other CPUs, especially if this CPU takes an interrupt or is
preempted.

> +	return get_pid(pid);	/* null pid OK here */
> +}
> +
> +/* See Documentation/uprobes.txt. */
> +int register_uprobe(struct uprobe *u)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_task *cur_utask, *cur_utask_quiescing = NULL;
> +	struct uprobe_process *uproc;
> +	struct uprobe_probept *ppt;
> +	struct uprobe_kimg *uk;
> +	struct pid *p;
> +	int ret = 0, uproc_is_new = 0;
> +	bool survivors;
> +#ifndef CONFIG_UBP_XOL
> +	struct task_struct *tsk;
> +#endif
> +
> +	if (!u || !u->handler)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	p = uprobe_get_tg_leader(u->pid);
> +	if (!p)
> +		return -ESRCH;
> +
> +	cur_utask = uprobe_find_utask(current);
> +	if (cur_utask && cur_utask->active_probe) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Called from handler; cur_utask->uproc is read-locked.
> +		 * Do this registration later.
> +		 */
> +		put_pid(p);
> +		return defer_registration(u, 1, cur_utask);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Get the uprobe_process for this pid, or make a new one. */
> +	mutex_lock(&uproc_mutex);
> +	uproc = uprobe_find_process(p);
> +
> +	if (uproc) {
> +		struct uprobe_task *utask;
> +
> +		mutex_unlock(&uproc_mutex);
> +		list_for_each_entry(utask, &uproc->thread_list, list) {
> +			if (!utask->active_probe)
> +				continue;
> +			/*
> +			 * utask is at a probepoint, but has dropped
> +			 * uproc->rwsem to single-step.  If utask is
> +			 * stopped, then it's probably because some
> +			 * other engine has asserted UTRACE_STOP;
> +			 * that engine may not allow UTRACE_RESUME
> +			 * until register_uprobe() returns.  But, for
> +			 * reasons we won't go into here, utask wants
> +			 * to finish with utask->active_probe before
> +			 * allowing handle_pending_uprobes() to run
> +			 * (via utask_fake_quiesce()).  So we defer this
> +			 * registration operation; it will be run after
> +			 * utask->active_probe is taken care of.
> +			 */
> +			BUG_ON(utask->state != UPTASK_SSTEP);
> +			if (task_is_stopped_or_traced(utask->tsk)) {
> +				ret =  defer_registration(u, 1, utask);
> +				goto fail_uproc;
> +			}
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		uproc = uprobe_mk_process(p);
> +		if (IS_ERR(uproc)) {
> +			ret = (int) PTR_ERR(uproc);
> +			mutex_unlock(&uproc_mutex);
> +			goto fail_tsk;
> +		}
> +		/* Hold uproc_mutex until we've added uproc to uproc_table. */
> +		uproc_is_new = 1;
> +	}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_UBP_XOL
> +	ret = xol_validate_vaddr(p, u->vaddr, uproc->xol_area);
> +#else
> +	tsk = pid_task(p, PIDTYPE_PID);
> +	ret = ubp_validate_insn_addr(tsk, u->vaddr);
> +#endif
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		goto fail_uproc;
> +
> +	if (u->kdata) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Probe is already/still registered.  This is the only
> +		 * place we return -EBUSY to the user.
> +		 */
> +		ret = -EBUSY;
> +		goto fail_uproc;
> +	}
> +
> +	uk = uprobe_mk_kimg(u);
> +	if (IS_ERR(uk)) {
> +		ret = (int) PTR_ERR(uk);
> +		goto fail_uproc;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* See if we already have a probepoint at the vaddr. */
> +	ppt = (uproc_is_new ? NULL : uprobe_find_probept(uproc, u->vaddr));
> +	if (ppt) {
> +		/* Breakpoint is already in place, or soon will be. */
> +		uk->ppt = ppt;
> +		list_add_tail(&uk->list, &ppt->uprobe_list);
> +		switch (ppt->state) {
> +		case UPROBE_INSERTING:
> +			uk->status = -EBUSY;	/* in progress */
> +			if (uproc->tg_leader == task_tgid(current)) {
> +				cur_utask_quiescing = cur_utask;
> +				BUG_ON(!cur_utask_quiescing);
> +			}
> +			break;
> +		case UPROBE_REMOVING:
> +			/* Wait!  Don't remove that bkpt after all! */
> +			ppt->state = UPROBE_BP_SET;
> +			/* Remove from pending list. */
> +			list_del(&ppt->pd_node);
> +			/* Wake unregister_uprobe(). */
> +			wake_up_all(&ppt->waitq);
> +			/*FALLTHROUGH*/
> +		case UPROBE_BP_SET:
> +			uk->status = 0;
> +			break;
> +		default:
> +			BUG();
> +		}
> +		up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +		put_pid(p);
> +		if (uk->status == 0) {
> +			uprobe_decref_process(uproc);
> +			return 0;
> +		}
> +		goto await_bkpt_insertion;
> +	} else {
> +		ppt = uprobe_add_probept(uk, uproc);
> +		if (IS_ERR(ppt)) {
> +			ret = (int) PTR_ERR(ppt);
> +			goto fail_uk;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	if (uproc_is_new) {
> +		hlist_add_head(&uproc->hlist,
> +				&uproc_table[hash_ptr(uproc->tg_leader,
> +				UPROBE_HASH_BITS)]);
> +		mutex_unlock(&uproc_mutex);
> +	}
> +	put_pid(p);
> +	survivors = quiesce_all_threads(uproc, &cur_utask_quiescing);
> +
> +	if (!survivors) {
> +		purge_uprobe(uk);
> +		up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +		uprobe_put_process(uproc, false);
> +		return -ESRCH;
> +	}
> +	up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +
> +await_bkpt_insertion:
> +	if (cur_utask_quiescing)
> +		/* Current task is probing its own process. */
> +		(void) utask_fake_quiesce(cur_utask_quiescing);
> +	else
> +		wait_event(ppt->waitq, ppt->state != UPROBE_INSERTING);
> +	ret = uk->status;
> +	if (ret != 0) {
> +		down_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +		purge_uprobe(uk);
> +		up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +	}
> +	uprobe_put_process(uproc, false);
> +	return ret;
> +
> +fail_uk:
> +	uprobe_free_kimg(uk);
> +
> +fail_uproc:
> +	if (uproc_is_new) {
> +		uprobe_free_process(uproc, 0);
> +		mutex_unlock(&uproc_mutex);
> +	} else {
> +		up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +		uprobe_put_process(uproc, false);
> +	}
> +
> +fail_tsk:
> +	put_pid(p);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_uprobe);
> +
> +/* See Documentation/uprobes.txt. */
> +void unregister_uprobe(struct uprobe *u)
> +{
> +	struct pid *p;
> +	struct uprobe_process *uproc;
> +	struct uprobe_kimg *uk;
> +	struct uprobe_probept *ppt;
> +	struct uprobe_task *cur_utask, *cur_utask_quiescing = NULL;
> +	struct uprobe_task *utask;
> +
> +	if (!u)
> +		return;
> +	p = uprobe_get_tg_leader(u->pid);
> +	if (!p)
> +		return;
> +
> +	cur_utask = uprobe_find_utask(current);
> +	if (cur_utask && cur_utask->active_probe) {
> +		/* Called from handler; uproc is read-locked; do this later */
> +		put_pid(p);
> +		(void) defer_registration(u, 0, cur_utask);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Lock uproc before walking the graph, in case the process we're
> +	 * probing is exiting.
> +	 */
> +	mutex_lock(&uproc_mutex);
> +	uproc = uprobe_find_process(p);
> +	mutex_unlock(&uproc_mutex);
> +	put_pid(p);
> +	if (!uproc)
> +		return;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(utask, &uproc->thread_list, list) {
> +		if (!utask->active_probe)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/* See comment in register_uprobe(). */
> +		BUG_ON(utask->state != UPTASK_SSTEP);
> +		if (task_is_stopped_or_traced(utask->tsk)) {
> +			(void) defer_registration(u, 0, utask);
> +			goto done;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	uk = (struct uprobe_kimg *)u->kdata;
> +	if (!uk)
> +		/*
> +		 * This probe was never successfully registered, or
> +		 * has already been unregistered.
> +		 */
> +		goto done;
> +	if (uk->status == -EBUSY)
> +		/* Looks like register or unregister is already in progress. */
> +		goto done;
> +	ppt = uk->ppt;
> +
> +	list_del(&uk->list);
> +	uprobe_free_kimg(uk);
> +
> +	if (!list_empty(&ppt->uprobe_list))
> +		goto done;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The last uprobe at ppt's probepoint is being unregistered.
> +	 * Queue the breakpoint for removal.
> +	 */
> +	ppt->state = UPROBE_REMOVING;
> +	list_add_tail(&ppt->pd_node, &uproc->pending_uprobes);
> +
> +	(void) quiesce_all_threads(uproc, &cur_utask_quiescing);
> +	up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +	if (cur_utask_quiescing)
> +		/* Current task is probing its own process. */
> +		(void) utask_fake_quiesce(cur_utask_quiescing);
> +	else
> +		wait_event(ppt->waitq, ppt->state != UPROBE_REMOVING);
> +
> +	if (likely(ppt->state == UPROBE_DISABLED)) {
> +		down_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +		uprobe_free_probept(ppt);
> +		/* else somebody else's register_uprobe() resurrected ppt. */
> +		up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +	}
> +	uprobe_put_process(uproc, false);
> +	return;
> +
> +done:
> +	up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +	uprobe_put_process(uproc, false);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unregister_uprobe);
> +
> +/* Find a surviving thread in uproc.  Runs with uproc->rwsem locked. */
> +static struct task_struct *find_surviving_thread(struct uprobe_process *uproc)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_task *utask;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry(utask, &uproc->thread_list, list) {
> +		if (!(utask->tsk->flags & PF_EXITING))
> +			return utask->tsk;
> +	}
> +	return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Run all the deferred_registrations previously queued by the current utask.
> + * Runs with no locks or mutexes held.  The current utask's uprobe_process
> + * is ref-counted, so it won't disappear as the result of unregister_u*probe()
> + * called here.
> + */
> +static void uprobe_run_def_regs(struct list_head *drlist)
> +{
> +	struct deferred_registration *dr, *d;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(dr, d, drlist, list) {
> +		int result = 0;
> +		struct uprobe *u = dr->uprobe;
> +
> +		if (dr->regflag)
> +			result = register_uprobe(u);
> +		else
> +			unregister_uprobe(u);
> +		if (u && u->registration_callback)
> +			u->registration_callback(u, dr->regflag, result);
> +		list_del(&dr->list);
> +		kfree(dr);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * utrace engine report callbacks
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * We've been asked to quiesce, but aren't in a position to do so.
> + * This could happen in either of the following cases:
> + *
> + * 1) Our own thread is doing a register or unregister operation --
> + * e.g., as called from a uprobe handler or a non-uprobes utrace
> + * callback.  We can't wait_event() for ourselves in [un]register_uprobe().
> + *
> + * 2) We've been asked to quiesce, but we hit a probepoint first.  Now
> + * we're in the report_signal callback, having handled the probepoint.
> + * We'd like to just turn on UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE) and coast into
> + * quiescence.  Unfortunately, it's possible to hit a probepoint again
> + * before we quiesce.  When processing the SIGTRAP, utrace would call
> + * uprobe_report_quiesce(), which must decline to take any action so
> + * as to avoid removing the uprobe just hit.  As a result, we could
> + * keep hitting breakpoints and never quiescing.
> + *
> + * So here we do essentially what we'd prefer to do in uprobe_report_quiesce().
> + * If we're the last thread to quiesce, handle_pending_uprobes() and
> + * rouse_all_threads().  Otherwise, pretend we're quiescent and sleep until
> + * the last quiescent thread handles that stuff and then wakes us.
> + *
> + * Called and returns with no mutexes held.  Returns 1 if we free utask->uproc,
> + * else 0.
> + */
> +static int utask_fake_quiesce(struct uprobe_task *utask)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_process *uproc = utask->uproc;
> +	enum uprobe_task_state prev_state = utask->state;
> +
> +	down_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +
> +	/* In case we're somehow set to quiesce for real... */
> +	clear_utrace_quiesce(utask, false);
> +
> +	if (uproc->n_quiescent_threads == uproc->nthreads-1) {
> +		/* We're the last thread to "quiesce." */
> +		handle_pending_uprobes(uproc, utask->tsk);
> +		rouse_all_threads(uproc);
> +		up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +		return 0;
> +	} else {
> +		utask->state = UPTASK_SLEEPING;
> +		uproc->n_quiescent_threads++;
> +		up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +		/* We ref-count sleepers. */
> +		uprobe_get_process(uproc);
> +
> +		wait_event(uproc->waitq, !utask->quiescing);
> +
> +		down_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +		utask->state = prev_state;
> +		uproc->n_quiescent_threads--;
> +		up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * If uproc's last uprobe has been unregistered, and
> +		 * unregister_uprobe() woke up before we did, it's up
> +		 * to us to free uproc.
> +		 */
> +		return uprobe_put_process(uproc, false);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/* Prepare to single-step ppt's probed instruction inline. */
> +static void uprobe_pre_ssin(struct uprobe_task *utask,
> +	struct uprobe_probept *ppt, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(ppt->ssil_state == SSIL_DISABLE)) {
> +		reset_thread_ip(utask->tsk, regs, ppt->ubp.vaddr);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ppt->ssil_lock, flags);
> +	while (ppt->ssil_state == SSIL_SET) {
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ppt->ssil_lock, flags);
> +		up_read(&utask->uproc->rwsem);
> +		wait_event(ppt->ssilq, ppt->ssil_state != SSIL_SET);
> +		down_read(&utask->uproc->rwsem);
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&ppt->ssil_lock, flags);
> +	}
> +	if (unlikely(ppt->ssil_state == SSIL_DISABLE)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * While waiting to single step inline, breakpoint has
> +		 * been removed. Thread continues as if nothing happened.
> +		 */
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ppt->ssil_lock, flags);
> +		reset_thread_ip(utask->tsk, regs, ppt->ubp.vaddr);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +	ppt->ssil_state = SSIL_SET;
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ppt->ssil_lock, flags);
> +
> +	if (unlikely(ubp_pre_sstep(utask->tsk, &ppt->ubp,
> +					&utask->arch_info, regs) != 0)) {
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to temporarily restore original "
> +			"instruction for single-stepping: "
> +			"pid/tgid=%d/%d, vaddr=%#lx\n",
> +			utask->tsk->pid, utask->tsk->tgid, ppt->ubp.vaddr);
> +		utask->doomed = true;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/* Prepare to continue execution after single-stepping inline. */
> +static void uprobe_post_ssin(struct uprobe_task *utask,
> +	struct uprobe_probept *ppt, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(ubp_post_sstep(utask->tsk, &ppt->ubp,
> +					&utask->arch_info, regs) != 0))
> +		printk("Couldn't restore bp: pid/tgid=%d/%d, addr=%#lx\n",
> +			utask->tsk->pid, utask->tsk->tgid, ppt->ubp.vaddr);
> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&ppt->ssil_lock, flags);
> +	if (likely(ppt->ssil_state == SSIL_SET)) {
> +		ppt->ssil_state = SSIL_CLEAR;
> +		wake_up(&ppt->ssilq);
> +	}
> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ppt->ssil_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_UBP_XOL
> +/*
> + * This architecture wants to do single-stepping out of line, but now we've
> + * discovered that it can't -- typically because we couldn't set up the XOL
> + * vma.  Make all probepoints use inline single-stepping.
> + */
> +static void uproc_cancel_xol(struct uprobe_process *uproc)
> +{
> +	down_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +	if (likely(uproc->sstep_out_of_line)) {
> +		/* No other task beat us to it. */
> +		int i;
> +		struct uprobe_probept *ppt;
> +		struct hlist_node *node;
> +		struct hlist_head *head;
> +		for (i = 0; i < UPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
> +			head = &uproc->uprobe_table[i];
> +			hlist_for_each_entry(ppt, node, head, ut_node) {
> +				if (!(ppt->ubp.strategy & UBP_HNT_INLINE))
> +					ubp_cancel_xol(current, &ppt->ubp);
> +			}
> +		}
> +		/* Do this last, so other tasks don't proceed too soon. */
> +		uproc->sstep_out_of_line = false;
> +	}
> +	up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +}
> +
> +/* Prepare to single-step ppt's probed instruction out of line. */
> +static int uprobe_pre_ssout(struct uprobe_task *utask,
> +	struct uprobe_probept *ppt, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	if (!ppt->ubp.xol_vaddr)
> +		ppt->ubp.xol_vaddr = xol_get_insn_slot(&ppt->ubp,
> +						ppt->uproc->xol_area);
> +	if (unlikely(!ppt->ubp.xol_vaddr)) {
> +		ubp_cancel_xol(utask->tsk, &ppt->ubp);
> +		return -1;
> +	}
> +	utask->singlestep_addr = ppt->ubp.xol_vaddr;
> +	return ubp_pre_sstep(utask->tsk, &ppt->ubp, &utask->arch_info, regs);
> +}
> +
> +/* Prepare to continue execution after single-stepping out of line. */
> +static int uprobe_post_ssout(struct uprobe_task *utask,
> +	struct uprobe_probept *ppt, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = ubp_post_sstep(utask->tsk, &ppt->ubp, &utask->arch_info, regs);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +/*
> + * If this thread is supposed to be quiescing, mark it quiescent; and
> + * if it was the last thread to quiesce, do the work we quiesced for.
> + * Runs with utask->uproc->rwsem write-locked.  Returns true if we can
> + * let this thread resume.
> + */
> +static bool utask_quiesce(struct uprobe_task *utask)
> +{
> +	if (utask->quiescing) {
> +		if (utask->state != UPTASK_QUIESCENT) {
> +			utask->state = UPTASK_QUIESCENT;
> +			utask->uproc->n_quiescent_threads++;
> +		}
> +		return check_uproc_quiesced(utask->uproc, current);
> +	} else {
> +		clear_utrace_quiesce(utask, false);
> +		return true;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Delay delivery of the indicated signal until after single-step.
> + * Otherwise single-stepping will be cancelled as part of calling
> + * the signal handler.
> + */
> +static void uprobe_delay_signal(struct uprobe_task *utask, siginfo_t *info)
> +{
> +	struct delayed_signal *ds;
> +
> +	ds = kmalloc(sizeof(*ds), GFP_USER);
> +	if (ds) {
> +		ds->info = *info;
> +		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ds->list);
> +		list_add_tail(&ds->list, &utask->delayed_signals);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static void uprobe_inject_delayed_signals(struct list_head *delayed_signals)
> +{
> +	struct delayed_signal *ds, *tmp;
> +
> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(ds, tmp, delayed_signals, list) {
> +		send_sig_info(ds->info.si_signo, &ds->info, current);
> +		list_del(&ds->list);
> +		kfree(ds);
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Verify from Instruction Pointer if singlestep has indeed occurred.
> + * If Singlestep has occurred, then do post singlestep fix-ups.
> + */
> +static bool validate_and_post_sstep(struct uprobe_task *utask,
> +				struct pt_regs *regs,
> +				struct uprobe_probept *ppt)
> +{
> +	unsigned long vaddr = instruction_pointer(regs);
> +
> +	if (ppt->ubp.strategy & UBP_HNT_INLINE) {
> +		/*
> +		 * If we have singlestepped, Instruction pointer cannot
> +		 * be same as virtual address of probepoint.
> +		 */
> +		if (vaddr == ppt->ubp.vaddr)
> +			return false;
> +		uprobe_post_ssin(utask, ppt, regs);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_UBP_XOL
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * If we have executed out of line, Instruction pointer
> +		 * cannot be same as virtual address of XOL slot.
> +		 */
> +		if (vaddr == ppt->ubp.xol_vaddr)
> +			return false;
> +		uprobe_post_ssout(utask, ppt, regs);
> +#endif
> +	}
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Helper routine for uprobe_report_signal().
> + * We get called here with:
> + *	state = UPTASK_RUNNING => we are here due to a breakpoint hit
> + *		- Read-lock the process
> + *		- Figure out which probepoint, based on regs->IP
> + *		- Set state = UPTASK_BP_HIT
> + *		- Invoke handler for each uprobe at this probepoint
> + *		- Reset regs->IP to beginning of the insn, if necessary
> + *		- Start watching for quiesce events, in case another
> + *			engine cancels our UTRACE_SINGLESTEP with a
> + *			UTRACE_STOP.
> + *		- Set singlestep in motion (UTRACE_SINGLESTEP),
> + *			with state = UPTASK_SSTEP
> + *		- Read-unlock the process
> + *
> + *	state = UPTASK_SSTEP => here after single-stepping
> + *		- Read-lock the process
> + *		- Validate we are here per the state machine
> + *		- Clean up after single-stepping
> + *		- Set state = UPTASK_RUNNING
> + *		- Read-unlock the process
> + *		- If it's time to quiesce, take appropriate action.
> + *		- If the handler(s) we ran called [un]register_uprobe(),
> + *			complete those via uprobe_run_def_regs().
> + *
> + *	state = ANY OTHER STATE
> + *		- Not our signal, pass it on (UTRACE_RESUME)
> + */
> +static u32 uprobe_handle_signal(u32 action,
> +				struct uprobe_task *utask,
> +				struct pt_regs *regs,
> +				siginfo_t *info,
> +				const struct k_sigaction *orig_ka)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_probept *ppt;
> +	struct uprobe_process *uproc;
> +	struct uprobe_kimg *uk;
> +	unsigned long probept;
> +	enum utrace_resume_action resume_action;
> +	enum utrace_signal_action signal_action = utrace_signal_action(action);
> +
> +	uproc = utask->uproc;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * We may need to re-assert UTRACE_SINGLESTEP if this signal
> +	 * is not associated with the breakpoint.
> +	 */
> +	if (utask->state == UPTASK_SSTEP)
> +		resume_action = UTRACE_SINGLESTEP;
> +	else
> +		resume_action = UTRACE_RESUME;
> +	/*
> +	 * This might be UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT request but some other
> +	 * engine's callback might have changed the signal action to
> +	 * something other than UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT. Use orig_ka to figure
> +	 * out such cases.
> +	 */
> +	if (unlikely(signal_action == UTRACE_SIGNAL_REPORT) || !orig_ka) {
> +		/* This thread was quiesced using UTRACE_INTERRUPT. */
> +		bool done_quiescing;
> +		if (utask->active_probe)
> +			/*
> +			 * We'll fake quiescence after we're done
> +			 * processing the probepoint.
> +			 */
> +			return UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN | resume_action;
> +
> +		down_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +		done_quiescing = utask_quiesce(utask);
> +		up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +		if (done_quiescing)
> +			resume_action = UTRACE_RESUME;
> +		else
> +			resume_action = UTRACE_STOP;
> +		return UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN | resume_action;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * info will be null if we're called with action=UTRACE_SIGNAL_HANDLER,
> +	 * which means that single-stepping has been disabled so a signal
> +	 * handler can be called in the probed process.  That should never
> +	 * happen because we intercept and delay handled signals (action =
> +	 * UTRACE_RESUME) until after we're done single-stepping.
> +	 */
> +	BUG_ON(!info);
> +	if (signal_action == UTRACE_SIGNAL_DELIVER && utask->active_probe &&
> +					info->si_signo != SSTEP_SIGNAL) {
> +		uprobe_delay_signal(utask, info);
> +		return UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN | UTRACE_SINGLESTEP;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (info->si_signo != BREAKPOINT_SIGNAL &&
> +					info->si_signo != SSTEP_SIGNAL)
> +		goto no_interest;
> +
> +	switch (utask->state) {
> +	case UPTASK_RUNNING:
> +		if (info->si_signo != BREAKPOINT_SIGNAL)
> +			goto no_interest;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_UBP_XOL
> +		/*
> +		 * Set up the XOL area if it's not already there.  We
> +		 * do this here because we have to do it before
> +		 * handling the first probepoint hit, the probed
> +		 * process has to do it, and this may be the first
> +		 * time our probed process runs uprobes code.  We need
> +		 * the XOL area for the uretprobe trampoline even if
> +		 * this architectures doesn't single-step out of line.
> +		 */
> +		if (uproc->sstep_out_of_line && !uproc->xol_area) {
> +			uproc->xol_area = xol_get_area(uproc->tg_leader);
> +			if (unlikely(uproc->sstep_out_of_line) &&
> +					unlikely(!uproc->xol_area))
> +				uproc_cancel_xol(uproc);
> +		}
> +#endif
> +
> +		down_read(&uproc->rwsem);
> +		/* Don't quiesce while running handlers. */
> +		clear_utrace_quiesce(utask, false);
> +		probept = ubp_get_bkpt_addr(regs);
> +		ppt = uprobe_find_probept(uproc, probept);
> +		if (!ppt) {
> +			up_read(&uproc->rwsem);
> +			goto no_interest;
> +		}
> +		utask->active_probe = ppt;
> +		utask->state = UPTASK_BP_HIT;
> +
> +		if (likely(ppt->state == UPROBE_BP_SET)) {
> +			list_for_each_entry(uk, &ppt->uprobe_list, list) {
> +				struct uprobe *u = uk->uprobe;
> +				if (u->handler)
> +					u->handler(u, regs);
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_UBP_XOL
> +		if ((ppt->ubp.strategy & UBP_HNT_INLINE) ||
> +				uprobe_pre_ssout(utask, ppt, regs) != 0)
> +#endif
> +			uprobe_pre_ssin(utask, ppt, regs);
> +		if (unlikely(utask->doomed)) {
> +			utask->active_probe = NULL;
> +			utask->state = UPTASK_RUNNING;
> +			up_read(&uproc->rwsem);
> +			goto no_interest;
> +		}
> +		utask->state = UPTASK_SSTEP;
> +		/* In case another engine cancels our UTRACE_SINGLESTEP... */
> +		utask_adjust_flags(utask, UPROBE_SET_FLAGS,
> +							UTRACE_EVENT(QUIESCE));
> +		/* Don't deliver this signal to the process. */
> +		resume_action = UTRACE_SINGLESTEP;
> +		signal_action = UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN;
> +
> +		up_read(&uproc->rwsem);
> +		break;
> +
> +	case UPTASK_SSTEP:
> +		if (info->si_signo != SSTEP_SIGNAL)
> +			goto no_interest;
> +
> +		down_read(&uproc->rwsem);
> +		ppt = utask->active_probe;
> +		BUG_ON(!ppt);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Havent singlestepped yet? then re-assert
> +		 * UTRACE_SINGLESTEP.
> +		 */
> +		if (!validate_and_post_sstep(utask, regs, ppt)) {
> +			up_read(&uproc->rwsem);
> +			goto no_interest;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* No further need to re-assert UTRACE_SINGLESTEP. */
> +		clear_utrace_quiesce(utask, false);
> +
> +		utask->active_probe = NULL;
> +		utask->state = UPTASK_RUNNING;
> +		if (unlikely(utask->doomed)) {
> +			up_read(&uproc->rwsem);
> +			goto no_interest;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (utask->quiescing) {
> +			int uproc_freed;
> +			up_read(&uproc->rwsem);
> +			uproc_freed = utask_fake_quiesce(utask);
> +			BUG_ON(uproc_freed);
> +		} else
> +			up_read(&uproc->rwsem);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * We hold a ref count on uproc, so this should never
> +		 * make utask or uproc disappear.
> +		 */
> +		uprobe_run_def_regs(&utask->deferred_registrations);
> +
> +		uprobe_inject_delayed_signals(&utask->delayed_signals);
> +
> +		resume_action = UTRACE_RESUME;
> +		signal_action = UTRACE_SIGNAL_IGN;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		goto no_interest;
> +	}
> +
> +no_interest:
> +	return signal_action | resume_action;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Signal callback:
> + */
> +static u32 uprobe_report_signal(u32 action,
> +				struct utrace_engine *engine,
> +				struct pt_regs *regs,
> +				siginfo_t *info,
> +				const struct k_sigaction *orig_ka,
> +				struct k_sigaction *return_ka)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_task *utask;
> +	struct uprobe_process *uproc;
> +	bool doomed;
> +	enum utrace_resume_action report_action;
> +
> +	utask = (struct uprobe_task *)rcu_dereference(engine->data);

Are we really in an RCU read-side critical section here?

> +	BUG_ON(!utask);
> +	uproc = utask->uproc;
> +
> +	/* Keep uproc intact until just before we return. */
> +	uprobe_get_process(uproc);
> +	report_action = uprobe_handle_signal(action, utask, regs, info,
> +								orig_ka);
> +	doomed = utask->doomed;
> +
> +	if (uprobe_put_process(uproc, true))
> +		report_action = utrace_signal_action(report_action) |
> +					UTRACE_DETACH;
> +	if (doomed)
> +		do_exit(SIGSEGV);
> +	return report_action;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Quiesce callback: The associated process has one or more breakpoint
> + * insertions or removals pending.  If we're the last thread in this
> + * process to quiesce, do the insertion(s) and/or removal(s).
> + */
> +static u32 uprobe_report_quiesce(u32 action,
> +				struct utrace_engine *engine,
> +				unsigned long event)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_task *utask;
> +	struct uprobe_process *uproc;
> +	bool done_quiescing = false;
> +
> +	utask = (struct uprobe_task *)rcu_dereference(engine->data);

Are we really in an RCU read-side critical section here?

> +	BUG_ON(!utask);
> +
> +	if (utask->state == UPTASK_SSTEP)
> +		/*
> +		 * We got a breakpoint trap and tried to single-step,
> +		 * but somebody else's report_signal callback overrode
> +		 * our UTRACE_SINGLESTEP with a UTRACE_STOP.  Try again.
> +		 */
> +		return UTRACE_SINGLESTEP;
> +
> +	BUG_ON(utask->active_probe);
> +	uproc = utask->uproc;
> +	down_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +	done_quiescing = utask_quiesce(utask);
> +	up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +	return done_quiescing ? UTRACE_RESUME : UTRACE_STOP;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * uproc's process is exiting or exec-ing.  Runs with uproc->rwsem
> + * write-locked.  Caller must ref-count uproc before calling this
> + * function, to ensure that uproc doesn't get freed in the middle of
> + * this.
> + */
> +static void uprobe_cleanup_process(struct uprobe_process *uproc)
> +{
> +	struct hlist_node *pnode1, *pnode2;
> +	struct uprobe_kimg *uk, *unode;
> +	struct uprobe_probept *ppt;
> +	struct hlist_head *head;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	uproc->finished = true;
> +	for (i = 0; i < UPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
> +		head = &uproc->uprobe_table[i];
> +		hlist_for_each_entry_safe(ppt, pnode1, pnode2, head, ut_node) {
> +			if (ppt->state == UPROBE_INSERTING ||
> +					ppt->state == UPROBE_REMOVING) {
> +				/*
> +				 * This task is (exec/exit)ing with
> +				 * a [un]register_uprobe pending.
> +				 * [un]register_uprobe will free ppt.
> +				 */
> +				ppt->state = UPROBE_DISABLED;
> +				list_del(&ppt->pd_node);
> +				list_for_each_entry_safe(uk, unode,
> +					       &ppt->uprobe_list, list)
> +					uk->status = -ESRCH;
> +				wake_up_all(&ppt->waitq);
> +			} else if (ppt->state == UPROBE_BP_SET) {
> +				list_for_each_entry_safe(uk, unode,
> +					       &ppt->uprobe_list, list) {
> +					list_del(&uk->list);
> +					uprobe_free_kimg(uk);
> +				}
> +				uprobe_free_probept(ppt);
> +			/* else */
> +				/*
> +				 * If ppt is UPROBE_DISABLED, assume that
> +				 * [un]register_uprobe() has been notified
> +				 * and will free it soon.
> +				 */
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static u32 uprobe_exec_exit(struct utrace_engine *engine,
> +				struct task_struct *tsk, int exit)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_process *uproc;
> +	struct uprobe_probept *ppt;
> +	struct uprobe_task *utask;
> +	bool utask_quiescing;
> +
> +	utask = (struct uprobe_task *)rcu_dereference(engine->data);

Are we really in an RCU read-side critical section here?

> +	uproc = utask->uproc;
> +	uprobe_get_process(uproc);
> +
> +	ppt = utask->active_probe;
> +	if (ppt) {
> +		printk(KERN_WARNING "Task handler called %s while at uprobe"
> +				" probepoint: pid/tgid = %d/%d, probepoint"
> +				" = %#lx\n", (exit ? "exit" : "exec"),
> +				tsk->pid, tsk->tgid, ppt->ubp.vaddr);
> +		/*
> +		 * Mutex cleanup depends on where do_execve()/do_exit() was
> +		 * called and on ubp strategy (XOL vs. SSIL).
> +		 */
> +		if (ppt->ubp.strategy & UBP_HNT_INLINE) {
> +			switch (utask->state) {
> +				unsigned long flags;
> +			case UPTASK_SSTEP:
> +				spin_lock_irqsave(&ppt->ssil_lock, flags);
> +				ppt->ssil_state = SSIL_CLEAR;
> +				wake_up(&ppt->ssilq);
> +				spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ppt->ssil_lock, flags);
> +				break;
> +			default:
> +				break;
> +			}
> +		}
> +		if (utask->state == UPTASK_BP_HIT) {
> +			/* uprobe handler called do_exit()/do_execve(). */
> +			up_read(&uproc->rwsem);
> +			uprobe_decref_process(uproc);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	down_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +	utask_quiescing = utask->quiescing;
> +	uproc->nthreads--;
> +	if (utrace_set_events_pid(utask->pid, engine, 0))
> +		/* We don't care. */
> +		;
> +	uprobe_free_task(utask, 1);
> +	if (uproc->nthreads) {
> +		/*
> +		 * In case other threads are waiting for us to quiesce...
> +		 */
> +		if (utask_quiescing)
> +			(void) check_uproc_quiesced(uproc,
> +				       find_surviving_thread(uproc));
> +	} else
> +		/*
> +		 * We were the last remaining thread - clean up the uprobe
> +		 * remnants a la unregister_uprobe(). We don't have to
> +		 * remove the breakpoints, though.
> +		 */
> +		uprobe_cleanup_process(uproc);
> +
> +	up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +	uprobe_put_process(uproc, true);
> +	return UTRACE_DETACH;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Exit callback: The associated task/thread is exiting.
> + */
> +static u32 uprobe_report_exit(u32 action,
> +			struct utrace_engine *engine,
> +			long orig_code, long *code)
> +{
> +	return uprobe_exec_exit(engine, current, 1);
> +}
> +/*
> + * Clone callback: The current task has spawned a thread/process.
> + * Utrace guarantees that parent and child pointers will be valid
> + * for the duration of this callback.
> + *
> + * NOTE: For now, we don't pass on uprobes from the parent to the
> + * child. We now do the necessary clearing of breakpoints in the
> + * child's address space.
> + *
> + * TODO:
> + *	- Provide option for child to inherit uprobes.
> + */
> +static u32 uprobe_report_clone(u32 action,
> +				struct utrace_engine *engine,
> +				unsigned long clone_flags,
> +				struct task_struct *child)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe_process *uproc;
> +	struct uprobe_task *ptask, *ctask;
> +
> +	ptask = (struct uprobe_task *)rcu_dereference(engine->data);

Are we really in an RCU read-side critical section here?

> +	uproc = ptask->uproc;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Lock uproc so no new uprobes can be installed 'til all
> +	 * report_clone activities are completed.
> +	 */
> +	mutex_lock(&uproc_mutex);
> +	down_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +
> +	if (clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD) {
> +		/* New thread in the same process. */
> +		ctask = uprobe_find_utask(child);
> +		if (unlikely(ctask)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * uprobe_mk_process() ran just as this clone
> +			 * happened, and has already accounted for the
> +			 * new child.
> +			 */
> +		} else {
> +			struct pid *child_pid = get_pid(task_pid(child));
> +			BUG_ON(!child_pid);
> +			ctask = uprobe_add_task(child_pid, uproc);
> +			BUG_ON(!ctask);
> +			if (IS_ERR(ctask))
> +				goto done;
> +			uproc->nthreads++;
> +			/*
> +			 * FIXME: Handle the case where uproc is quiescing
> +			 * (assuming it's possible to clone while quiescing).
> +			 */
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		/*
> +		 * New process spawned by parent.  Remove the probepoints
> +		 * in the child's text.
> +		 *
> +		 * Its not necessary to quiesce the child as we are assured
> +		 * by utrace that this callback happens *before* the child
> +		 * gets to run userspace.
> +		 *
> +		 * We also hold the uproc->rwsem for the parent - so no
> +		 * new uprobes will be registered 'til we return.
> +		 */
> +		int i;
> +		struct uprobe_probept *ppt;
> +		struct hlist_node *node;
> +		struct hlist_head *head;
> +
> +		for (i = 0; i < UPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
> +			head = &uproc->uprobe_table[i];
> +			hlist_for_each_entry(ppt, node, head, ut_node) {
> +				if (ubp_remove_bkpt(child, &ppt->ubp) != 0) {
> +					/* Ratelimit this? */
> +					printk(KERN_ERR "Pid %d forked %d;"
> +						" failed to remove probepoint"
> +						" at %#lx in child\n",
> +						current->pid, child->pid,
> +						ppt->ubp.vaddr);
> +				}
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +done:
> +	up_write(&uproc->rwsem);
> +	mutex_unlock(&uproc_mutex);
> +	return UTRACE_RESUME;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Exec callback: The associated process called execve() or friends
> + *
> + * The new program is about to start running and so there is no
> + * possibility of a uprobe from the previous user address space
> + * to be hit.
> + *
> + * NOTE:
> + *	Typically, this process would have passed through the clone
> + *	callback, where the necessary action *should* have been
> + *	taken. However, if we still end up at this callback:
> + *		- We don't have to clear the uprobes - memory image
> + *		  will be overlaid.
> + *		- We have to free up uprobe resources associated with
> + *		  this process.
> + */
> +static u32 uprobe_report_exec(u32 action,
> +				struct utrace_engine *engine,
> +				const struct linux_binfmt *fmt,
> +				const struct linux_binprm *bprm,
> +				struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	return uprobe_exec_exit(engine, current, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct utrace_engine_ops uprobe_utrace_ops = {
> +	.report_quiesce = uprobe_report_quiesce,
> +	.report_signal = uprobe_report_signal,
> +	.report_exit = uprobe_report_exit,
> +	.report_clone = uprobe_report_clone,
> +	.report_exec = uprobe_report_exec
> +};
> +
> +static int __init init_uprobes(void)
> +{
> +	int ret, i;
> +
> +	ubp_strategies = UBP_HNT_TSKINFO;
> +	ret = ubp_init(&ubp_strategies);
> +	if (ret != 0) {
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "Can't start uprobes: ubp_init() returned %d\n",
> +								ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	for (i = 0; i < UPROBE_TABLE_SIZE; i++) {
> +		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&uproc_table[i]);
> +		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&utask_table[i]);
> +	}
> +
> +	p_uprobe_utrace_ops = &uprobe_utrace_ops;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit exit_uprobes(void)
> +{
> +}
> +
> +module_init(init_uprobes);
> +module_exit(exit_uprobes);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-12  2:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 158+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-11 12:25 [RFC] [PATCH 0/7] UBP, XOL and Uprobes Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-11 12:25 ` [RFC] [PATCH 1/7] User Space Breakpoint Assistance Layer (UBP) Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-14 11:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-14 19:46     ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-15  9:02       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 21:07         ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-15 21:49           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-16  0:58             ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-16 10:33               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-17  0:12               ` Bryan Donlan
2010-01-18  7:37                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-17 14:37               ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-15  9:03       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15  9:38         ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2010-01-15  9:50           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 10:10             ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2010-01-15 10:13               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 10:22                 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2010-01-15 10:56                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 11:02                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 21:19             ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-17 14:39             ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-17 14:52               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-17 14:56                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-17 15:01                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20 12:55                     ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-17 14:59                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-17 15:03                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-17 19:33                     ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-18  7:45                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 11:01                         ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-18 11:44                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 12:01                             ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-18 12:06                               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 12:09                                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-18 12:13                                   ` Pekka Enberg
2010-01-18 12:17                                     ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-18 12:24                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 12:24                                       ` Pekka Enberg
2010-01-18 12:44                                       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-18 12:51                                         ` Pekka Enberg
2010-01-18 12:53                                           ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-18 12:57                                             ` Pekka Enberg
2010-01-18 13:06                                               ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-18 22:15                                               ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-19  8:07                                                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-19 17:47                                                   ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-19 18:06                                                     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-20  6:36                                                       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-20 10:51                                                         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-20 19:31                                                       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-01-20  9:43                                                     ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-20  9:57                                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-20 12:22                                                         ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-27  8:24                                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-01-27  8:35                                                             ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-27  9:08                                                               ` Ingo Molnar
2010-01-27  9:25                                                                 ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-27 10:23                                                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-07 13:47                                                                     ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-20 10:45                                                       ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-20 12:23                                                         ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-20 18:31                                                     ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-20 19:34                                                       ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-20 19:58                                                         ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-20 20:28                                                           ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-18 13:05                                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 13:34                                             ` Mark Wielaard
2010-01-18 19:49                                               ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-18 15:43                                     ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2010-01-18 16:52                                       ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-18 17:10                                         ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2010-01-18 12:14                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 12:37                                     ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-18 13:15                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 13:33                                         ` Avi Kivity
2010-01-18 13:34                                         ` K.Prasad
2010-01-20 15:57                                         ` Mel Gorman
2010-01-20 18:32                                     ` Andi Kleen
2010-01-18 11:45                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-11 12:25 ` [RFC] [PATCH 2/7] x86 support for UBP Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-11 12:25 ` [RFC] [PATCH 3/7] Execution out of line (XOL) Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-14 11:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-14 22:43     ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-15  9:07       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 11:12         ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-15 20:18         ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-11 12:25 ` [RFC] [PATCH 4/7] Uprobes Implementation Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-12  2:01   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2010-01-12  8:21     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-12  5:36   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-12  8:14     ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2010-01-13  0:53       ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-14 11:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-12  8:54     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-14 11:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-14 22:49     ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-15  9:10       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15  9:26         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2010-01-15  9:35           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 13:10             ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2010-01-15 13:25               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 13:38                 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2010-01-15 13:47                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 14:00                     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2010-01-15 14:06                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 14:22                         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2010-01-15 14:40                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 14:20                     ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-15 14:25                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 23:11                       ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-16 15:50                         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2010-01-15 10:26         ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-15 10:33           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 11:05             ` Maneesh Soni
2010-01-15 11:12               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 11:18                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 22:27                   ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-15 23:44                 ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-16 10:04                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 13:08             ` Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-15 13:16               ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-15 13:38                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-11 12:25 ` [RFC] [PATCH 5/7] X86 Support for Uprobes Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-14 11:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-14 23:07     ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-11 12:26 ` [RFC] [PATCH 6/7] Uprobes Documentation Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-11 12:26 ` [RFC] [PATCH 7/7] Ftrace plugin for Uprobes Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-12  4:54   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-12  5:08     ` Steven Rostedt
2010-01-12  5:44       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-12 19:12       ` Tim Bird
2010-01-13 21:58       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-01-13 22:12         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-01-13 23:36           ` Steven Rostedt
2010-01-12 18:54     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2010-01-12 22:00       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-01-12 22:15         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2010-01-12 22:30           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-01-14 11:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-14 11:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-14 12:16       ` Mark Wielaard
2010-01-14 12:19         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-14 11:35     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-14 11:43       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-14 12:23         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-14 12:29           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-18 13:00             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2010-01-11 14:35 ` [RFC] [PATCH 0/7] UBP, XOL and Uprobes Masami Hiramatsu
2010-01-11 22:59   ` Jim Keniston
2010-01-22  7:02 ` [RFC] [PATCH 0/7] UBP, XOL and Uprobes [ Summary of Comments and actions to be taken ] Srikar Dronamraju
2010-01-22  7:24   ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2010-01-22 10:47     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-27  6:53     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-27  8:24       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-22 18:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-01-22 18:36     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2010-01-22 23:55     ` Jim Keniston

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100112020155.GC10869@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@infradead.org \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mjw@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=utrace-devel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).