linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: get_maintainer.pl: append reason for cc to the name by default
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:00:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100927190026.20ddc268@schatten.dmk.lab> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100927154441.GE3602@thunk.org>

On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:44:41 -0400
Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 04:57:48PM +0200, Florian Mickler wrote:
> > 
> > Would in essence have the same effect, but I think it's slightly better
> > to have some shorter tags in the mail addresses, as I expect them to
> > actually show up on lkml quite a bit.
> 
> What if there are no tags on mail addresses that come from the
> MAINTAINERS file, but only tags on the mail addresses that come from
> guessing wildly based on git sign-offs?  People should just be looking
> in the MAINTAINERS file, after all, and I don't think that's something
> that needs an explanation.
> 
> The thing that needs explanation is when someone like Steve Hemminger
> gets cc'ed on a patch for fs/ext4/acl.c, which really makes no sense
> at all, where you desperately need some kind of tag:
> 
> shemminger@vyatta.com (Wild guess using get_maintainer.pl --git)
> 
> 	      	    	  			  - Ted

Might make sense to omit the tags on the MAINTAINER-source. I can
agree to your reasoning there. 


As far as I can see, the use and the use cases for the git-part of
get_maintainer.pl are mostly to get patches to not-so-well-maintained
parts of the tree upstream. What I envision for the git part is a
scoring based classification scheme that uses all readily available
information of the git-history to determine relevant people for patch
review and patch routing.

I already have implemented a small parser that extracts that information
out of git-log and makes them available to the script, but didn't have
time to wire it up yet. 

Another improvement (beyond finding a decent heuristic based on the
artifacts 'authorship', 'signed-off-by', 'reviewed-by', 'acked-by',
'committer' and nr-of-lines-changed.. and maybe time) is probably to
not make an arbitrarily 1-Year-Back cut-off, but to check the last N
commits on that region of the tree. (I'm thinking of the more
"settled down" areas of the tree here)
But let's see what I come up with...

Regards,
Flo

  reply	other threads:[~2010-09-27 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-09-10  9:33 [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: append reason for cc to the name by default florian
2010-09-10  9:42 ` Joe Perches
2010-09-10  9:46   ` Wolfram Sang
2010-09-10  9:53   ` Mark Brown
2010-09-10 10:04     ` Joe Perches
2010-09-10 10:18       ` Mark Brown
2010-09-10 10:47         ` Joe Perches
2010-09-10 11:07           ` Mark Brown
2010-09-11  0:22           ` [PATCH] scripts/get_maintainer.pl: Add --git-blame --rolestats "Authored lines" information Joe Perches
2010-09-11  9:38             ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-11  9:52               ` Joe Perches
2010-09-11 10:02                 ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-11 10:22                   ` Joe Perches
2010-09-11 19:22                   ` [PATCH] Documentation/SubmittingPatches: Add and describe scripts/get_maintainer.pl Joe Perches
2010-09-11 19:34                     ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-11 19:43                     ` [PATCH V2] " Joe Perches
2010-09-12 16:18                       ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-10 11:44         ` [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: append reason for cc to the name by default Alan Cox
2010-09-10 10:22       ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-10 10:47         ` Joe Perches
2010-09-11 21:22     ` Joe Perches
2010-09-10 10:30   ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-10 11:04     ` Mark Brown
2010-09-10 11:15       ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-10 21:04     ` Andrew Morton
2010-09-10 21:39       ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-10 21:44       ` Joe Perches
2010-09-13  4:01     ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-09-13  5:21       ` [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: Look for .get_maintainer.conf in lk, then $HOME then scripts Joe Perches
2010-09-13  6:13         ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-13 13:21         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-09-10 11:11   ` [PATCH] get_maintainer.pl: append reason for cc to the name by default Florian Mickler
2010-09-10 15:12     ` Joe Perches
2010-09-11  9:34       ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-11  0:13   ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-11  0:31     ` Joe Perches
2010-09-11  0:45       ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-09-11  0:56         ` Joe Perches
2010-09-11  9:28         ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-13  7:16           ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-09-13  7:57             ` Joe Perches
2010-09-13  8:54               ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-14 17:19                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-09-14 17:46                   ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-15  3:28                     ` Joe Perches
2010-09-15  4:34                       ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-15  4:45                         ` Joe Perches
2010-09-15 12:49                           ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-14 23:15                   ` Joe Perches
2010-09-13  9:01             ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-14 17:24               ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-09-26 18:52 ` RFC: " Joe Perches
2010-09-27 14:57   ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-27 15:44     ` Ted Ts'o
2010-09-27 17:00       ` Florian Mickler [this message]
2010-09-27 18:21         ` Ted Ts'o
2010-09-27 19:26           ` Florian Mickler
2010-09-27 20:08             ` Joe Perches
2010-09-27 20:47               ` Ted Ts'o
2010-09-27 21:16                 ` Joe Perches
2010-09-28  4:22                   ` Ted Ts'o
2010-09-28  4:37                   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100927190026.20ddc268@schatten.dmk.lab \
    --to=florian@mickler.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).