linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* XFS status update for November 2010
@ 2010-12-20 18:00 Christoph Hellwig
  2010-12-21 11:32 ` Boaz Harrosh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2010-12-20 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xfs, linux-kernel

>From looking at the kernel git commits November looked like a pretty
slow month with just two hand full fixes going into the release candidates
for Linux 2.6.37, and none at all going into the development tree.
But in this case git statistics didn't tell the whole story - there
was a lot of activity on patches for the next merge window on the list.
The focus in November was still at metadata scalability, with various
patchsets that improves parallel creates and unlinks again, and also
improves 8-way dbench throughput by 30%.  In addition to that there
were patches to improve preallocation for NFS servers, to simplify
the writeback code, and to remove the XFS-internal percpu counters
for free space for the generic kernel percpu counters, which just needed
a small improvement.

On the user space side we saw the release of xfsprogs 3.1.4, which
contains various accumulated bug fixes and Debian packaging updates.
The xfsdump tree saw a large update to speed up restore by using
mmap for an internal database and remove the limitation of ~ 214
million directory entries per dump file.  The xfstests test suite
saw three new testcases and various fixes, including support for the
hfsplus filesystem.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: XFS status update for November 2010
  2010-12-20 18:00 XFS status update for November 2010 Christoph Hellwig
@ 2010-12-21 11:32 ` Boaz Harrosh
  2010-12-21 23:53   ` Dave Chinner
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Boaz Harrosh @ 2010-12-21 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: xfs, linux-kernel

On 12/20/2010 08:00 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>From looking at the kernel git commits November looked like a pretty
> slow month with just two hand full fixes going into the release candidates
> for Linux 2.6.37, and none at all going into the development tree.
> But in this case git statistics didn't tell the whole story - there
> was a lot of activity on patches for the next merge window on the list.
> The focus in November was still at metadata scalability, with various
> patchsets that improves parallel creates and unlinks again, and also
> improves 8-way dbench throughput by 30%.  In addition to that there
> were patches to improve preallocation for NFS servers, to simplify
> the writeback code, and to remove the XFS-internal percpu counters
> for free space for the generic kernel percpu counters, which just needed
> a small improvement.
> 
> On the user space side we saw the release of xfsprogs 3.1.4, which
> contains various accumulated bug fixes and Debian packaging updates.
> The xfsdump tree saw a large update to speed up restore by using
> mmap for an internal database and remove the limitation of ~ 214
> million directory entries per dump file.  The xfstests test suite
> saw three new testcases and various fixes, including support for the
> hfsplus filesystem.

Hi Christoph, happy holidays

I love these reports you do, thank you

I have one small request, could you please post them to
linux-fsdevel as well. linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org is so crowded
I keep missing them.

Thanks
Boaz

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: XFS status update for November 2010
  2010-12-21 11:32 ` Boaz Harrosh
@ 2010-12-21 23:53   ` Dave Chinner
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2010-12-21 23:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Boaz Harrosh; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, xfs, linux-kernel

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 01:32:23PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 12/20/2010 08:00 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>From looking at the kernel git commits November looked like a pretty
> > slow month with just two hand full fixes going into the release candidates
> > for Linux 2.6.37, and none at all going into the development tree.
> > But in this case git statistics didn't tell the whole story - there
> > was a lot of activity on patches for the next merge window on the list.
> > The focus in November was still at metadata scalability, with various
> > patchsets that improves parallel creates and unlinks again, and also
> > improves 8-way dbench throughput by 30%.  In addition to that there
> > were patches to improve preallocation for NFS servers, to simplify
> > the writeback code, and to remove the XFS-internal percpu counters
> > for free space for the generic kernel percpu counters, which just needed
> > a small improvement.
> > 
> > On the user space side we saw the release of xfsprogs 3.1.4, which
> > contains various accumulated bug fixes and Debian packaging updates.
> > The xfsdump tree saw a large update to speed up restore by using
> > mmap for an internal database and remove the limitation of ~ 214
> > million directory entries per dump file.  The xfstests test suite
> > saw three new testcases and various fixes, including support for the
> > hfsplus filesystem.
> 
> Hi Christoph, happy holidays
> 
> I love these reports you do, thank you
> 
> I have one small request, could you please post them to
> linux-fsdevel as well. linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org is so crowded
> I keep missing them.

Boaz, you can set up a modification watch on this page:

http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_Status_Updates

as Christoph posts the updates there as well.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-21 23:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-20 18:00 XFS status update for November 2010 Christoph Hellwig
2010-12-21 11:32 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-12-21 23:53   ` Dave Chinner

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).