From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>,
Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>,
Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH][RFC][resend] CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE should default to N
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:52:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110322025232.GL14675@home.goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1103212105490.15815@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 09:08:24PM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> I believe that the majority of systems we are built on want a -O2 compiled
> kernel. Optimizing for size (-Os) is mainly benneficial for embedded
> systems and systems with very small CPU caches (correct me if I'm wrong).
> So it seems wrong to me that CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE defaults to 'y' and
> recommends saying 'Y' if unsure. I believe it should default to 'n' and
> recommend that if unsure. People who bennefit from -Os know who they are
> and can enable the option if needed/wanted - the majority shouldn't
> select this. Right?
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
I've actually seen nothing but problems with -Os.
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-22 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-21 20:08 PATCH][RFC][resend] CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE should default to N Jesper Juhl
2011-03-22 2:52 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2011-03-22 8:21 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-03-22 8:25 ` Jesper Juhl
2011-03-22 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-22 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-23 17:45 ` Andi Kleen
2011-03-23 21:14 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110322025232.GL14675@home.goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@free.fr \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=jj@chaosbits.net \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).