linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, yinghai@kernel.org,
	davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH UPDATED 04/13] x86: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:44:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110714094423.GG3455@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1310462166-31469-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

>From 5732e1247898d67cbf837585150fe9f68974671d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:22:16 +0200

Convert x86 to HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP.  The only difference in memory
handling is that allocations can't no longer cross node boundaries
whether they're node affine or not, which shouldn't matter at all.

This conversion will enable further simplification of boot memory
handling.

-v2: Fix build failure on !NUMA configurations discovered by hpa.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
---
 arch/x86/Kconfig                |    1 +
 arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h |    2 --
 arch/x86/mm/init_32.c           |    8 ++++----
 arch/x86/mm/init_64.c           |    2 +-
 arch/x86/mm/memblock.c          |   14 --------------
 arch/x86/mm/numa.c              |   15 +++++++--------
 6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index da34972..97f0894 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ config X86
 	select HAVE_IOREMAP_PROT
 	select HAVE_KPROBES
 	select HAVE_MEMBLOCK
+	select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
 	select ARCH_WANT_OPTIONAL_GPIOLIB
 	select ARCH_WANT_FRAME_POINTERS
 	select HAVE_DMA_ATTRS
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
index 161792e..1460db2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h
@@ -12,8 +12,6 @@ int __get_free_all_memory_range(struct range **range, int nodeid,
 			 unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn);
 int get_free_all_memory_range(struct range **rangep, int nodeid);
 
-void memblock_x86_register_active_regions(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
-					 unsigned long last_pfn);
 u64 memblock_x86_hole_size(u64 start, u64 end);
 u64 memblock_x86_free_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit);
 u64 memblock_x86_memory_in_range(u64 addr, u64 limit);
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
index 29f7c6d..5d173db 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_32.c
@@ -650,18 +650,18 @@ void __init initmem_init(void)
 	highstart_pfn = highend_pfn = max_pfn;
 	if (max_pfn > max_low_pfn)
 		highstart_pfn = max_low_pfn;
-	memblock_x86_register_active_regions(0, 0, highend_pfn);
-	sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions(0);
 	printk(KERN_NOTICE "%ldMB HIGHMEM available.\n",
 		pages_to_mb(highend_pfn - highstart_pfn));
 	num_physpages = highend_pfn;
 	high_memory = (void *) __va(highstart_pfn * PAGE_SIZE - 1) + 1;
 #else
-	memblock_x86_register_active_regions(0, 0, max_low_pfn);
-	sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions(0);
 	num_physpages = max_low_pfn;
 	high_memory = (void *) __va(max_low_pfn * PAGE_SIZE - 1) + 1;
 #endif
+
+	memblock_set_node(0, (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX, 0);
+	sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions(0);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_FLATMEM
 	max_mapnr = num_physpages;
 #endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
index d865c4a..7fb064c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ kernel_physical_mapping_init(unsigned long start,
 #ifndef CONFIG_NUMA
 void __init initmem_init(void)
 {
-	memblock_x86_register_active_regions(0, 0, max_pfn);
+	memblock_set_node(0, (phys_addr_t)ULLONG_MAX, 0);
 }
 #endif
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
index e4569f8..97fbc39 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/memblock.c
@@ -283,20 +283,6 @@ static int __init memblock_x86_find_active_region(const struct memblock_region *
 	return 1;
 }
 
-/* Walk the memblock.memory map and register active regions within a node */
-void __init memblock_x86_register_active_regions(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
-					 unsigned long last_pfn)
-{
-	unsigned long ei_startpfn;
-	unsigned long ei_endpfn;
-	struct memblock_region *r;
-
-	for_each_memblock(memory, r)
-		if (memblock_x86_find_active_region(r, start_pfn, last_pfn,
-					   &ei_startpfn, &ei_endpfn))
-			add_active_range(nid, ei_startpfn, ei_endpfn);
-}
-
 /*
  * Find the hole size (in bytes) in the memory range.
  * @start: starting address of the memory range to scan
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index 824efad..f4a40bd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -498,13 +498,10 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 	if (WARN_ON(nodes_empty(node_possible_map)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++)
-		memblock_x86_register_active_regions(mi->blk[i].nid,
-					mi->blk[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT,
-					mi->blk[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
-
-	/* for out of order entries */
-	sort_node_map();
+	for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
+		struct numa_memblk *mb = &mi->blk[i];
+		memblock_set_node(mb->start, mb->end - mb->start, mb->nid);
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * If sections array is gonna be used for pfn -> nid mapping, check
@@ -538,6 +535,8 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
 			setup_node_data(nid, start, end);
 	}
 
+	/* Dump memblock with node info and return. */
+	memblock_dump_all();
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -575,7 +574,7 @@ static int __init numa_init(int (*init_func)(void))
 	nodes_clear(node_possible_map);
 	nodes_clear(node_online_map);
 	memset(&numa_meminfo, 0, sizeof(numa_meminfo));
-	remove_all_active_ranges();
+	WARN_ON(memblock_set_node(0, ULLONG_MAX, MAX_NUMNODES));
 	numa_reset_distance();
 
 	ret = init_func();
-- 
1.7.6


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-14  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-12  9:15 [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 01/13] memblock: Remove memblock_memory_can_coalesce() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:31   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 02/13] memblock: Reimplement memblock_add_region() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:32   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 03/13] memblock: Add optional region->nid Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  9:43   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:32     ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 04/13] x86: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  1:35   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14  9:44   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-07-14 21:33     ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 05/13] x86: Use __memblock_alloc_base() in early_reserve_e820() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:33   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:15 ` [PATCH 06/13] memblock: Implement for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:34   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 07/13] x86: Replace memblock_x86_find_in_range_size() with for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:34   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 08/13] memblock, x86: Make free_all_memory_core_early() explicitly free lowmem only Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:35   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 09/13] memblock, x86: Replace __get_free_all_memory_range() with for_each_free_mem_range() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:35   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 10/13] memblock, x86: Reimplement memblock_find_dma_reserve() using iterators Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:36   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 11/13] x86: Use absent_pages_in_range() instead of memblock_x86_hole_size() Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:36   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 12/13] memblock, x86: Make ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK a config option Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  9:46   ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:37     ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-12  9:16 ` [PATCH 13/13] memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free_range() with generic ones Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:10   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:20     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:23       ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:32         ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:38           ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 20:41             ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 20:43               ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 21:38     ` [tip:x86/memblock] memblock: Cast phys_addr_t to unsigned long long for printf use tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-14 21:37   ` [tip:x86/memblock] memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free_range() with generic ones tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-26 21:06   ` [PATCH 13/13] " Yinghai Lu
2011-07-26 21:46     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-27  0:59       ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-27  8:07         ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-12 23:26 ` [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Yinghai Lu
2011-07-13  3:21   ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-13  9:16     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-13  9:11   ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-13 19:06     ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-14  9:42 ` [PATCH 2.5/13] memblock: Use __meminit[data] instead of __init[data] Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:00   ` Yinghai Lu
2011-07-14 21:24     ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-15  5:45     ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-14 21:32   ` [tip:x86/memblock] " tip-bot for Tejun Heo
2011-07-14  9:49 ` [PATCHSET x86/mm] memblock, x86: Allow node info in memblock and remove x86 specific memblock code Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110714094423.GG3455@htj.dyndns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).