[01/27] ext4: fix undefined behavior in ext4_fill_flex_info()

* [01/27] ext4: fix undefined behavior in ext4_fill_flex_info()
  2012-01-23 23:42 [00/27] 2.6.32.55-longterm review Greg KH
@ 2012-01-23 23:40 ` Greg KH
  2012-01-23 23:40 ` [02/27] ALSA: snd-usb-us122l: Delete calls to preempt_disable Greg KH
                   ` (25 subsequent siblings)
  26 siblings, 0 replies; 31+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2012-01-23 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, stable; +Cc: torvalds, akpm, alan, Xi Wang, Theodore Tso

2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>

commit d50f2ab6f050311dbf7b8f5501b25f0bf64a439b upstream.

Commit 503358ae01b70ce6909d19dd01287093f6b6271c ("ext4: avoid divide by
zero when trying to mount a corrupted file system") fixes CVE-2009-4307
by performing a sanity check on s_log_groups_per_flex, since it can be
set to a bogus value by an attacker.

	sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex = sbi->s_es->s_log_groups_per_flex;
	groups_per_flex = 1 << sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex;

	if (groups_per_flex < 2) { ... }

This patch fixes two potential issues in the previous commit.

1) The sanity check might only work on architectures like PowerPC.
On x86, 5 bits are used for the shifting amount.  That means, given a
large s_log_groups_per_flex value like 36, groups_per_flex = 1 << 36
is essentially 1 << 4 = 16, rather than 0.  This will bypass the check,
leaving s_log_groups_per_flex and groups_per_flex inconsistent.

2) The sanity check relies on undefined behavior, i.e., oversized shift.
A standard-confirming C compiler could rewrite the check in unexpected
ways.  Consider the following equivalent form, assuming groups_per_flex
is unsigned for simplicity.

	groups_per_flex = 1 << sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex;
	if (groups_per_flex == 0 || groups_per_flex == 1) {

We compile the code snippet using Clang 3.0 and GCC 4.6.  Clang will
completely optimize away the check groups_per_flex == 0, leaving the
patched code as vulnerable as the original.  GCC keeps the check, but
there is no guarantee that future versions will do the same.

Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

---
 fs/ext4/super.c |    7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -1705,17 +1705,16 @@ static int ext4_fill_flex_info(struct su
 	struct ext4_group_desc *gdp = NULL;
 	ext4_group_t flex_group_count;
 	ext4_group_t flex_group;
-	int groups_per_flex = 0;
+	unsigned int groups_per_flex = 0;
 	size_t size;
 	int i;
 
 	sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex = sbi->s_es->s_log_groups_per_flex;
-	groups_per_flex = 1 << sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex;
-
-	if (groups_per_flex < 2) {
+	if (sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex < 1 || sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex > 31) {
 		sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex = 0;
 		return 1;
 	}
+	groups_per_flex = 1 << sbi->s_log_groups_per_flex;
 
 	/* We allocate both existing and potentially added groups */
 	flex_group_count = ((sbi->s_groups_count + groups_per_flex - 1) +



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 31+ messages in thread