From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Dmitry Antipov <dmitry.antipov@linaro.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@linaro.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] percpu: use ZERO_SIZE_PTR / ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:16:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120130181639.GJ3355@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201301206080.28693@router.home>
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:12:18PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > I thought it didn't. I rememer thinking about this and determining
> > that NULL can't be allocated for dynamic addresses. Maybe I'm
> > imagining things. Anyways, if it can return NULL for valid
> > allocation, it is a bug and should be fixed.
>
> I dont see anything that would hinder an arbitrary value to be returned.
> NULL is also used for the failure case. Definitely a bug.
Given the address translation we do and kernel image layout, I don't
think this can happen on x86. It may theoretically possible on other
archs tho. Anyways, yeah, this one needs improving.
> > We don't have returned addr >= PAGE_SIZE guarantee yet but I'm fairly
> > sure that's the only acceptable direction if we want any improvement
> > in this area.
>
> The ZERO_SIZE_PTR patch would not make the situation that much worse.
I'm not objecting to marking zero-sized allocations per-se. I'm
saying the patch is pointless at this point. It doesn't contribute
anything while giving the illusion of better error checking than we
actually do. Let's do it when it can actually work.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-30 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-30 8:37 [PATCH 1/3] percpu: use ZERO_SIZE_PTR / ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR Dmitry Antipov
2012-01-30 16:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-30 17:15 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-30 17:19 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-30 17:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-30 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-30 17:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-30 17:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-30 17:42 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-30 17:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-30 17:54 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-30 17:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-30 18:02 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-30 18:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-01-30 18:16 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-01-31 4:48 ` Rusty Russell
2012-01-30 18:13 ` Tejun Heo
2012-01-30 18:15 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120130181639.GJ3355@google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=dmitry.antipov@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).