linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 808 bytes --]

Hi Artem,

After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c:191:12: error: conflicting types for 'pmc551_unpoint'
include/linux/mtd/pmc551.h:37:13: note: previous declaration of 'pmc551_unpoint' was here
drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c: In function 'pmc551_unpoint':
drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c:196:1: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]

Caused by commit 753c57f84b57 ("mtd: return error code from
mtd_unpoint").  [Mind you, I don't understand why those static functions
would be declared in a header file ...]

I have used the l2-mtd tree from next-20120203 for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Artem Bityutskiy]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 999 bytes --]

On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 12:07 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Artem,
> 
> After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c:191:12: error: conflicting types for 'pmc551_unpoint'
> include/linux/mtd/pmc551.h:37:13: note: previous declaration of 'pmc551_unpoint' was here
> drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c: In function 'pmc551_unpoint':
> drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c:196:1: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]
> 
> Caused by commit 753c57f84b57 ("mtd: return error code from
> mtd_unpoint").  [Mind you, I don't understand why those static functions
> would be declared in a header file ...]

Thanks, fixed. I am doing rather massive MTD API cleaning, so new small
issues are possible.

WRT the header file - I think it should not be in 'inlude/linux' at all
- I'll try to cook a patch to kick it out of there, thanks!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 858 bytes --]

Hi Artem,

On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:14:14 +0200 Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 12:07 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c:191:12: error: conflicting types for 'pmc551_unpoint'
> > include/linux/mtd/pmc551.h:37:13: note: previous declaration of 'pmc551_unpoint' was here
> > drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c: In function 'pmc551_unpoint':
> > drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c:196:1: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]
> 
> Thanks, fixed. I am doing rather massive MTD API cleaning, so new small
> issues are possible.

You fixed the header file, but not the fact that pmc551_unpoint() still
doesn't return anything ... Warnings are there for a reason sometimes :-)

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Brian Norris]

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 12:19:05PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Brian,

Hi Stephen,

> After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c: In function 'ns_init_module':
> drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c:2353:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'nandsim_debugfs_remove' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   nandsim_debugfs_remove(nand);
>   ^
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   e8e3edb95ce6 ("mtd: create per-device and module-scope debugfs entries")
> 
> interacting with commit
> 
>   b974696da1cf ("mtd: nandsim: remove debugfs entries in error path")
> 
> from Linus' tree.

Yes, this was expected in the divergence between a bugfix merge	for 4.13
vs. a feature change in 4.14. I think Boris has fixed the conflict in
his merges and is uploading that to l2-mtd/master (he's handling MTD for
4.14).

Good to know you catch this too :)

> I applied the following merge fix patch ... please check.
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 12:13:42 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] fix merge of l2-mtd tree
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c
> index 00635fd738f6..1ddf0b73c246 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c
> @@ -2350,7 +2350,6 @@ static int __init ns_init_module(void)
>          return 0;
>  
>  err_exit:
> -	nandsim_debugfs_remove(nand);
>  	free_nandsim(nand);
>  	nand_release(nsmtd);
>  	for (i = 0;i < ARRAY_SIZE(nand->partitions); ++i)

I think this is right, and it matches what Boris is pushing.

Regards,
Brian

linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Brian,

After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c: In function 'ns_init_module':
drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c:2353:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'nandsim_debugfs_remove' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  nandsim_debugfs_remove(nand);
  ^

Caused by commit

  e8e3edb95ce6 ("mtd: create per-device and module-scope debugfs entries")

interacting with commit

  b974696da1cf ("mtd: nandsim: remove debugfs entries in error path")

from Linus' tree.

I applied the following merge fix patch ... please check.

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 12:13:42 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] fix merge of l2-mtd tree

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c
index 00635fd738f6..1ddf0b73c246 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nandsim.c
@@ -2350,7 +2350,6 @@ static int __init ns_init_module(void)
         return 0;
 
 err_exit:
-	nandsim_debugfs_remove(nand);
 	free_nandsim(nand);
 	nand_release(nsmtd);
 	for (i = 0;i < ARRAY_SIZE(nand->partitions); ++i)
-- 
2.13.2




-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Brian Norris]

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 12:08:39PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> 
> After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> ERROR: "of_flash_probe_versatile" [drivers/mtd/maps/physmap_of.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "of_flash_probe_gemini" [drivers/mtd/maps/physmap_of.ko] undefined!
> 
> Probably caused by commit
> 
>   56ff337ea433 ("mtd: physmap_of: add a hook for Gemini flash probing")
> 
> The config has:
> 
> CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP=m
> CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_COMPAT=y
> CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF=m
> CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_VERSATILE=y
> CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_GEMINI=y
> 
> I am not sure why this is a problem, but previously physmap_of_versatile.o
> would have been in obj-m and it is now in obj-y.

I think this part of that change does it:

--- a/drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile
@@ -18,9 +18,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_TSUNAMI)     += tsunami_flash.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PXA2XX)       += pxa2xx-flash.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP)      += physmap.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF)   += physmap_of.o
-ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_VERSATILE
-obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF)   += physmap_of_versatile.o
-endif
+obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_VERSATILE) += physmap_of_versatile.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_GEMINI)    += physmap_of_gemini.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PISMO)                += pismo.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PMC_MSP_EVM)   += pmcmsp-flash.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PCMCIA)       += pcmciamtd.o

We were previously just keeping physmap_of_versatile in sync with physmap_of.
So it could be a module, even though CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_VERSATILE was
'bool'.

This is kind of a weird scenario, since physmap_of actually depends on
*_versatile or *_gemini (when enabled). Maybe we should revert to something
like the original logic. We can even actually merge the 3 modules (and then
drop the EXPORT_*s too):

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile
index 2fec1e0c2371..aef1846b4de2 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/Makefile
@@ -17,9 +17,13 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_CK804XROM)	+= ck804xrom.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_TSUNAMI)	+= tsunami_flash.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PXA2XX)	+= pxa2xx-flash.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP)	+= physmap.o
+ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_VERSATILE
+physmap_of-objs += physmap_of_versatile.o
+endif
+ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_GEMINI
+physmap_of-objs += physmap_of_gemini.o
+endif
 obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF)	+= physmap_of.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_VERSATILE)	+= physmap_of_versatile.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_GEMINI)	+= physmap_of_gemini.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PISMO)		+= pismo.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PMC_MSP_EVM)   += pmcmsp-flash.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_PCMCIA)	+= pcmciamtd.o

I'll cook that into a proper patch if it seems good.

> I have used the version fo the l2-mtd tree from next-20170208 for today.

Sounds good.

Brian

linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Brian,

After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

ERROR: "of_flash_probe_versatile" [drivers/mtd/maps/physmap_of.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "of_flash_probe_gemini" [drivers/mtd/maps/physmap_of.ko] undefined!

Probably caused by commit

  56ff337ea433 ("mtd: physmap_of: add a hook for Gemini flash probing")

The config has:

CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP=m
CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_COMPAT=y
CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF=m
CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_VERSATILE=y
CONFIG_MTD_PHYSMAP_OF_GEMINI=y

I am not sure why this is a problem, but previously physmap_of_versatile.o
would have been in obj-m and it is now in obj-y.

I have used the version fo the l2-mtd tree from next-20170208 for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Brian,

On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 18:20:39 -0700 Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Known:
> 
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2016-July/068569.html
> 
> > Missing include of linux/io.h ...  
> 
> It's not missing linux/io.h; x86 is missing readsl()/writesl(). If x86
> folks don't have a solution, then I guess we'll just make this depend on
> !X86.

or remove COMPILE_TEST if it can't compile for everyone ...

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Brian Norris]

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:59:30AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> 
> After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c: In function 'cqspi_indirect_read_execute':
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c:529:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'readsl' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     readsl(ahb_base, rxbuf, DIV_ROUND_UP(bytes_to_read, 4));
>     ^
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c: In function 'cqspi_indirect_write_execute':
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c:613:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'writesl' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    writesl(cqspi->ahb_base, txbuf, DIV_ROUND_UP(write_bytes, 4));
>    ^
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   140623410536 ("mtd: spi-nor: Add driver for Cadence Quad SPI Flash Controller")

Known:

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2016-July/068569.html

> Missing include of linux/io.h ...

It's not missing linux/io.h; x86 is missing readsl()/writesl(). If x86
folks don't have a solution, then I guess we'll just make this depend on
!X86.

> I have used the l2-mtd tree from next-20160718 for today.

Regards,
Brian

linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Brian,

After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c: In function 'cqspi_indirect_read_execute':
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c:529:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'readsl' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    readsl(ahb_base, rxbuf, DIV_ROUND_UP(bytes_to_read, 4));
    ^
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c: In function 'cqspi_indirect_write_execute':
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/cadence-quadspi.c:613:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'writesl' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   writesl(cqspi->ahb_base, txbuf, DIV_ROUND_UP(write_bytes, 4));
   ^

Caused by commit

  140623410536 ("mtd: spi-nor: Add driver for Cadence Quad SPI Flash Controller")

Missing include of linux/io.h ...

I have used the l2-mtd tree from next-20160718 for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Brian,

After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:

drivers/mtd/nand/ndfc.c: In function 'ndfc_chip_init':
drivers/mtd/nand/ndfc.c:177:2: error: 'ppdata' undeclared (first use in this function)
  ppdata.of_node = flash_np;
  ^

Caused by commit

  a61ae81a1907 ("mtd: nand: drop unnecessary partition parser data")

I applied this fix patch for today:

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:44:57 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: nand: fix for drop unnecessary partition parser data

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
---
 drivers/mtd/nand/ndfc.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/ndfc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/ndfc.c
index 0709ea9dd8ed..7d72f4fe06a1 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/ndfc.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/ndfc.c
@@ -174,7 +174,6 @@ static int ndfc_chip_init(struct ndfc_controller *ndfc,
 		return -ENODEV;
 	nand_set_flash_node(chip, flash_np);
 
-	ppdata.of_node = flash_np;
 	mtd->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s.%s", dev_name(&ndfc->ofdev->dev),
 			      flash_np->name);
 	if (!mtd->name) {
-- 
2.6.2

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Brian,

After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:

drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c: In function 'vf610_nfc_resume':
drivers/mtd/nand/vf610_nfc.c:859:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pinctrl_pm_select_default_state' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  pinctrl_pm_select_default_state(dev);
  ^

Caused by commit

  456930d80a2d ("mtd: nand: vf610_nfc: Freescale NFC for VF610, MPC5125 and others")

I have reverted that commit (and the following one) for today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 473 bytes --]

Hi Artem,

On Tue, 27 May 2014 13:40:03 +0300 Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> apologies for not informing you about the onwership changes in time. But
> yes, Brian takes care of this tree now.

OK, thanks.

> The URL you have is technically correct, but it is better to use this
> instead:
> 
> git://git.infradead.org/l2-mtd.git#master

I have changed to use that.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Artem Bityutskiy]

On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 09:59 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> 
> On Mon, 26 May 2014 10:42:25 -0700 Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 03:30:47PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi Artem,
> > 
> > FYI, I'm managing this tree now, not Artem.
> 
> OK, noted.  Is there a different URL for the tree as well?  Currently
> it is git://git.infradead.org/users/dedekind/l2-mtd-2.6.git#master .

Hi Stephen,

apologies for not informing you about the onwership changes in time. But
yes, Brian takes care of this tree now.

The URL you have is technically correct, but it is better to use this
instead:

git://git.infradead.org/l2-mtd.git#master

The old URL is just a symlink to the above one nowadays. Thanks!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1269 bytes --]

Hi Brian,

On Mon, 26 May 2014 10:42:25 -0700 Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 03:30:47PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Artem,
> 
> FYI, I'm managing this tree now, not Artem.

OK, noted.  Is there a different URL for the tree as well?  Currently
it is git://git.infradead.org/users/dedekind/l2-mtd-2.6.git#master .

Here is the legalese:

Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next.  As
you may know, this is not a judgment of your code.  The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. 

You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
     * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
        Signed-off-by,
     * posted to the relevant mailing list,
     * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
     * successfully unit tested, and 
     * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.

Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell 
sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Brian Norris]

Hi Stephen,

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 03:30:47PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Artem,

FYI, I'm managing this tree now, not Artem.

> After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr2_nvm.c: In function 'ow_enable':
> drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr2_nvm.c:149:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'writel_relaxed' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>   writel_relaxed(build_mr_cfgmask(pcm_data->bus_width) | 0x18,
>   ^
> 
> Caused by commit 96ba9dd65788 ("mtd: lpddr: add driver for LPDDR2-NVM
> PCM memories").

Vincenzo and I have already identified the build failure. It's because
the I/O accessors are not implemented uniformly across architectures.
I just pushed a patch to restrict this driver to ARM for now, but I hope
this inconsistency will be improved soon. (I believe there's a patch
series out there right now.)

> I have used the l2-mtd tree from next-20140521 for today.

Thanks, and thanks for the report.

Regards,
Brian

linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 599 bytes --]

Hi Artem,

After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr2_nvm.c: In function 'ow_enable':
drivers/mtd/lpddr/lpddr2_nvm.c:149:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'writel_relaxed' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
  writel_relaxed(build_mr_cfgmask(pcm_data->bus_width) | 0x18,
  ^

Caused by commit 96ba9dd65788 ("mtd: lpddr: add driver for LPDDR2-NVM
PCM memories").

I have used the l2-mtd tree from next-20140521 for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Artem Bityutskiy]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 724 bytes --]

On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 11:28 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Artem,
> 
> On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 11:14:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > ERROR: "denali_init" [drivers/mtd/nand/denali_pci.ko] undefined!
> > ERROR: "denali_remove" [drivers/mtd/nand/denali_pci.ko] undefined!
> > 
> > Probably caused by commit 305b1ee29c8e ("mtd: denali: split the generic
> > driver and PCI layer").
> > 
> > I have used the l2-mtd tree from next-20121011 for today.
> 
> This is still broken today.

Sorry for slowness, now it should be fixed.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 617 bytes --]

Hi Artem,

On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 11:14:51 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> ERROR: "denali_init" [drivers/mtd/nand/denali_pci.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "denali_remove" [drivers/mtd/nand/denali_pci.ko] undefined!
> 
> Probably caused by commit 305b1ee29c8e ("mtd: denali: split the generic
> driver and PCI layer").
> 
> I have used the l2-mtd tree from next-20121011 for today.

This is still broken today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Dinh Nguyen]

Hi Stephen,

On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 11:14 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Artem,
> 
> After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> ERROR: "denali_init" [drivers/mtd/nand/denali_pci.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "denali_remove" [drivers/mtd/nand/denali_pci.ko] undefined!
> 
> Probably caused by commit 305b1ee29c8e ("mtd: denali: split the generic
> driver and PCI layer").
> 
> I have used the l2-mtd tree from next-20121011 for today.

Sorry about that. I just sent a patch to fix this. Please disregard the
first email, I forgot to include Artem in the email.

Thanks,
Dinh

linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 480 bytes --]

Hi Artem,

After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

ERROR: "denali_init" [drivers/mtd/nand/denali_pci.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "denali_remove" [drivers/mtd/nand/denali_pci.ko] undefined!

Probably caused by commit 305b1ee29c8e ("mtd: denali: split the generic
driver and PCI layer").

I have used the l2-mtd tree from next-20121011 for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Artem Bityutskiy]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 935 bytes --]

On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 13:58 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Artem,
> 
> After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c: In function 'pmc551_erase':
> drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c:157:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pmc551_point' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c: At top level:
> drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c:194:12: error: static declaration of 'pmc551_point' follows non-static declaration
> drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c:157:2: note: previous implicit declaration of 'pmc551_point' was here
> drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c: In function 'pmc551_unpoint':
> drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c:229:1: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]

Hi, thanks a lot, I missed this. Fixed and build-tested with ARCH=i386.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

linux-next: build failure after merge of the l2-mtd tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1046 bytes --]

Hi Artem,

After merging the l2-mtd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:

drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c: In function 'pmc551_erase':
drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c:157:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'pmc551_point' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c: At top level:
drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c:194:12: error: static declaration of 'pmc551_point' follows non-static declaration
drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c:157:2: note: previous implicit declaration of 'pmc551_point' was here
drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c: In function 'pmc551_unpoint':
drivers/mtd/devices/pmc551.c:229:1: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]

Caused by commit 1e43e2c68ec0 ("mtd: remove junk pmc551.h").  The last
warning was already there.  Please try to build test this stuff before
publishing ...

I have used the version of the l2-mtd tree from next-20120203 for today.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]