* mfd/tps65910: section mismatch for tps65910_sleepinit()
@ 2012-04-24 1:59 Gerard Snitselaar
2012-04-24 6:23 ` Laxman Dewangan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gerard Snitselaar @ 2012-04-24 1:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ldewangan, sameo; +Cc: linux-kernel
While looking into another problem I noticed a section mismatch with
tps65910_i2c_probe() calling tps65910_sleepinit() which is annotated
__init. Should tps65910_i2c_probe() be annotated __init as well?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: mfd/tps65910: section mismatch for tps65910_sleepinit()
2012-04-24 1:59 mfd/tps65910: section mismatch for tps65910_sleepinit() Gerard Snitselaar
@ 2012-04-24 6:23 ` Laxman Dewangan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Laxman Dewangan @ 2012-04-24 6:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gerard Snitselaar; +Cc: sameo, linux-kernel
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 07:29 AM, Gerard Snitselaar wrote:
> While looking into another problem I noticed a section mismatch with
> tps65910_i2c_probe() calling tps65910_sleepinit() which is annotated
> __init. Should tps65910_i2c_probe() be annotated __init as well?
>
Yes, that should be __init. Let me know if you are sending patch or I
need to do.
Thanks,
Laxman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-24 6:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-04-24 1:59 mfd/tps65910: section mismatch for tps65910_sleepinit() Gerard Snitselaar
2012-04-24 6:23 ` Laxman Dewangan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).