From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11 V5] workqueue: Add @bind arguement back without change any thing
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 12:49:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120905194908.GC13737@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346841475-4422-6-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:37:42PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Ensure the gcwq->flags is only accessed with gcwq->lock held.
> And make the code more easier to understand.
>
> In all current callsite of create_worker(), DISASSOCIATED can't
> be flipped while create_worker().
> So the whole behavior is unchanged with this patch.
This doesn't change anything. You're just moving the test to the
caller with comments there explaining how it won't change even if
gcwq->lock is released. It seems more confusing to me. The flag is
still protected by manager_mutex. How is this an improvement?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-05 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-05 10:37 [PATCH 00/11 V5] workqueue: reimplement unbind/rebind Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 01/11 V5] workqueue: ensure the wq_worker_sleeping() see the right flags Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 02/11 V5] workqueue: async idle rebinding Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 18:06 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-06 1:28 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 03/11 V5] workqueue: new day don't need WORKER_REBIND for busy rebinding Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 18:31 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-06 2:10 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 04/11 V5] workqueue: remove WORKER_REBIND Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 05/11 V5] workqueue: Add @bind arguement back without change any thing Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 19:49 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-09-06 1:04 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-06 16:51 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-07 2:11 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-07 19:37 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 06/11 V5] workqueue: unbind manager Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 07/11 V5] workqueue: rebind manager Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 08/11 V5] workqueue: unbind newly created worker Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 09/11 V5] workqueue: rebind " Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 16:19 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 10/11 V5] workqueue: unbind/rebind without manager_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 20:04 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-06 10:44 ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-06 17:00 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 11/11 V5] workqueue: remove manager_mutex Lai Jiangshan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120905194908.GC13737@google.com \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).