linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11 V5] workqueue: unbind/rebind without manager_mutex
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 13:04:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120905200411.GD13737@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1346841475-4422-11-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

Hello, Lai.

On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:37:47PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> gcwq_unbind_fn() unbind manager by ->manager pointer.
> 
> rebinding-manger, unbinding/rebinding newly created worker are done by
> other place. so we don't need manager_mutex any more.
> 
> Also change the comment of @bind accordingly.

Please don't scatter small prep patches like this.  Each piece in
isolation doesn't make much sense to me and the patch descriptions
don't help much.  Please collect the prep patches and explain in more
detail.

In general, I'm not sure about this approach.  I'd really like the
hotplug logic to be contained in hotplug logic proper as much as
possible.  This scatters around hotplug handling to usual code paths
and seems too invasive for 3.6-fixes.

Also, can you please talk to me before going ahead and sending me
completely new 10 patch series every other day?  You're taking
disproportionate amount of my time and I can't continue to do this.
Please discuss with me or at least explain the high-level approach in
the head message in detail.  Going through the patch series to figure
out high-level design which is constantly flipping is rather
inefficient and unfortunately your patch descriptions aren't too
helpful.  :(

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-05 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-05 10:37 [PATCH 00/11 V5] workqueue: reimplement unbind/rebind Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 01/11 V5] workqueue: ensure the wq_worker_sleeping() see the right flags Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 02/11 V5] workqueue: async idle rebinding Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 18:06   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-06  1:28     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 03/11 V5] workqueue: new day don't need WORKER_REBIND for busy rebinding Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 18:31   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-06  2:10     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 04/11 V5] workqueue: remove WORKER_REBIND Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 05/11 V5] workqueue: Add @bind arguement back without change any thing Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 19:49   ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-06  1:04     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-06 16:51       ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-07  2:11         ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-07 19:37           ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 06/11 V5] workqueue: unbind manager Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 07/11 V5] workqueue: rebind manager Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 08/11 V5] workqueue: unbind newly created worker Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 09/11 V5] workqueue: rebind " Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 16:19   ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 10/11 V5] workqueue: unbind/rebind without manager_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-05 20:04   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2012-09-06 10:44     ` Lai Jiangshan
2012-09-06 17:00       ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-05 10:37 ` [PATCH 11/11 V5] workqueue: remove manager_mutex Lai Jiangshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120905200411.GD13737@google.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).