From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>, Frank Eigler <fche@redhat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@in.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to track the active perf_event's
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 20:02:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130204190254.GA10875@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130204190225.GA10840@redhat.com>
Introduce "struct trace_uprobe_filter" which records the "active"
perf_event's attached to ftrace_event_call. For the start we simply
use list_head, we can optimize this later if needed. For example, we
do not really need to record an event with ->parent != NULL, we can
rely on parent->child_list. And we can certainly do some optimizations
for the case when 2 events have the same ->tp_target or tp_target->mm.
Change trace_uprobe_register() to process TRACE_REG_PERF_OPEN/CLOSE
and add/del this perf_event to the list.
We can probably avoid any locking, but lets start with the "obvioulsy
correct" trace_uprobe_filter->rwlock which protects everything.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
index 0a9a8de..f05ec32 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
@@ -28,6 +28,12 @@
#define UPROBE_EVENT_SYSTEM "uprobes"
+struct trace_uprobe_filter {
+ rwlock_t rwlock;
+ int nr_systemwide;
+ struct list_head perf_events;
+};
+
/*
* uprobe event core functions
*/
@@ -35,6 +41,7 @@ struct trace_uprobe {
struct list_head list;
struct ftrace_event_class class;
struct ftrace_event_call call;
+ struct trace_uprobe_filter filter;
struct uprobe_consumer consumer;
struct inode *inode;
char *filename;
@@ -58,6 +65,18 @@ static LIST_HEAD(uprobe_list);
static int uprobe_dispatcher(struct uprobe_consumer *con, struct pt_regs *regs);
+static inline void init_trace_uprobe_filter(struct trace_uprobe_filter *filter)
+{
+ rwlock_init(&filter->rwlock);
+ filter->nr_systemwide = 0;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&filter->perf_events);
+}
+
+static inline bool uprobe_filter_is_empty(struct trace_uprobe_filter *filter)
+{
+ return !filter->nr_systemwide && list_empty(&filter->perf_events);
+}
+
/*
* Allocate new trace_uprobe and initialize it (including uprobes).
*/
@@ -87,6 +106,7 @@ alloc_trace_uprobe(const char *group, const char *event, int nargs)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tu->list);
tu->consumer.handler = uprobe_dispatcher;
+ init_trace_uprobe_filter(&tu->filter);
return tu;
error:
@@ -541,6 +561,8 @@ static int probe_event_enable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, int flag)
if (is_trace_uprobe_enabled(tu))
return -EINTR;
+ WARN_ON(!uprobe_filter_is_empty(&tu->filter));
+
tu->flags |= flag;
ret = uprobe_register(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer);
if (ret)
@@ -554,6 +576,8 @@ static void probe_event_disable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, int flag)
if (!is_trace_uprobe_enabled(tu))
return;
+ WARN_ON(!uprobe_filter_is_empty(&tu->filter));
+
uprobe_unregister(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer);
tu->flags &= ~flag;
}
@@ -629,6 +653,30 @@ static int set_print_fmt(struct trace_uprobe *tu)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
+static int uprobe_perf_open(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ write_lock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
+ if (event->hw.tp_target)
+ list_add(&event->hw.tp_list, &tu->filter.perf_events);
+ else
+ tu->filter.nr_systemwide++;
+ write_unlock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int uprobe_perf_close(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ write_lock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
+ if (event->hw.tp_target)
+ list_del(&event->hw.tp_list);
+ else
+ tu->filter.nr_systemwide--;
+ write_unlock(&tu->filter.rwlock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/* uprobe profile handler */
static void uprobe_perf_func(struct trace_uprobe *tu, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
@@ -684,6 +732,13 @@ int trace_uprobe_register(struct ftrace_event_call *event, enum trace_reg type,
case TRACE_REG_PERF_UNREGISTER:
probe_event_disable(tu, TP_FLAG_PROFILE);
return 0;
+
+ case TRACE_REG_PERF_OPEN:
+ return uprobe_perf_open(tu, data);
+
+ case TRACE_REG_PERF_CLOSE:
+ return uprobe_perf_close(tu, data);
+
#endif
default:
return 0;
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-04 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-04 19:02 [PATCH 0/7] uprobes/perf: pre-filtering Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf: Ensure we do not free event->parent before event Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-20 13:35 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf: Introduce hw_perf_event->tp_target and ->tp_list Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11 9:44 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 3/7] uprobes: Introduce uprobe_apply() Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11 9:43 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:02 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-02-11 9:45 ` [PATCH 4/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to track the active perf_event's Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 5/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to pre-filter Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11 9:46 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:03 ` [PATCH 6/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to use UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11 9:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:03 ` [PATCH 7/7] uprobes/perf: Avoid uprobe_apply() whenever possible Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11 9:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH 0/7] uprobes/perf: pre-filtering Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-06 19:42 ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was uprobes/perf: pre-filtering) Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-06 19:42 ` [PATCH 1/1] perf/tools: Fix "perf record -C... workload" behaviour Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-25 9:58 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-02-07 6:01 ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was uprobes/perf: pre-filtering) Namhyung Kim
2013-02-07 15:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130204190254.GA10875@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jistone@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=suzuki@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).