linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>, Frank Eigler <fche@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki@in.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] uprobes: Introduce uprobe_apply()
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:13:53 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130211094353.GD525@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130204190250.GA10868@redhat.com>

* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> [2013-02-04 20:02:50]:

> Currently it is not possible to change the filtering constraints after
> uprobe_register(), so a consumer can not, say, start to trace a task/mm
> which was previously filtered out, or remove the no longer needed bp's.
> 
> Introduce uprobe_apply() which simply does register_for_each_vma() again
> to consult uprobe_consumer->filter() and install/remove the breakpoints.
> The only complication is that register_for_each_vma() can no longer
> assume that uprobe->consumers should be consulter if is_register == T,
> so we change it to accept "struct uprobe_consumer *new" instead.
> 
> Unlike uprobe_register(), uprobe_apply(true) doesn't do "unregister" if
> register_for_each_vma() fails, it is up to caller to handle the error.
> 
> Note: we probably need to cleanup the current interface, it is strange
> that uprobe_apply/unregister need inode/offset. We should either change
> uprobe_register() to return "struct uprobe *", or add a private ->uprobe
> member in uprobe_consumer. And in the long term uprobe_apply() should
> take a single argument, uprobe or consumer, even "bool add" should go
> away.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>


Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

> ---
>  include/linux/uprobes.h |    6 ++++++
>  kernel/events/uprobes.c |   39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/uprobes.h b/include/linux/uprobes.h
> index 95d0002..02b83db 100644
> --- a/include/linux/uprobes.h
> +++ b/include/linux/uprobes.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ extern int __weak set_swbp(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsign
>  extern int __weak set_orig_insn(struct arch_uprobe *aup, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr);
>  extern bool __weak is_swbp_insn(uprobe_opcode_t *insn);
>  extern int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
> +extern int uprobe_apply(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc, bool);
>  extern void uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
>  extern int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
>  extern void uprobe_munmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
> @@ -124,6 +125,11 @@ uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
>  {
>  	return -ENOSYS;
>  }
> +static inline int
> +uprobe_apply(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc, bool add)
> +{
> +	return -ENOSYS;
> +}
>  static inline void
>  uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
>  {
> diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> index 23340a7..2bcd08e 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> @@ -733,8 +733,10 @@ build_map_info(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t offset, bool is_register)
>  	return curr;
>  }
> 
> -static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
> +static int
> +register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *new)
>  {
> +	bool is_register = !!new;
>  	struct map_info *info;
>  	int err = 0;
> 
> @@ -765,7 +767,7 @@ static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
> 
>  		if (is_register) {
>  			/* consult only the "caller", new consumer. */
> -			if (consumer_filter(uprobe->consumers,
> +			if (consumer_filter(new,
>  					UPROBE_FILTER_REGISTER, mm))
>  				err = install_breakpoint(uprobe, mm, vma, info->vaddr);
>  		} else if (test_bit(MMF_HAS_UPROBES, &mm->flags)) {
> @@ -788,7 +790,7 @@ static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
>  static int __uprobe_register(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
>  {
>  	consumer_add(uprobe, uc);
> -	return register_for_each_vma(uprobe, true);
> +	return register_for_each_vma(uprobe, uc);
>  }
> 
>  static void __uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
> @@ -798,7 +800,7 @@ static void __uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *u
>  	if (!consumer_del(uprobe, uc))	/* WARN? */
>  		return;
> 
> -	err = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, false);
> +	err = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, NULL);
>  	/* TODO : cant unregister? schedule a worker thread */
>  	if (!uprobe->consumers && !err)
>  		delete_uprobe(uprobe);
> @@ -855,6 +857,35 @@ int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uprobe_register);
> 
>  /*
> + * uprobe_apply - unregister a already registered probe.
> + * @inode: the file in which the probe has to be removed.
> + * @offset: offset from the start of the file.
> + * @uc: consumer which wants to add more or remove some breakpoints
> + * @add: add or remove the breakpoints
> + */
> +int uprobe_apply(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset,
> +			struct uprobe_consumer *uc, bool add)
> +{
> +	struct uprobe *uprobe;
> +	struct uprobe_consumer *con;
> +	int ret = -ENOENT;
> +
> +	uprobe = find_uprobe(inode, offset);
> +	if (!uprobe)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	down_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
> +	for (con = uprobe->consumers; con && con != uc ; con = con->next)
> +		;
> +	if (con)
> +		ret = register_for_each_vma(uprobe, add ? uc : NULL);
> +	up_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
> +	put_uprobe(uprobe);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * uprobe_unregister - unregister a already registered probe.
>   * @inode: the file in which the probe has to be removed.
>   * @offset: offset from the start of the file.
> -- 
> 1.5.5.1
> 

-- 
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju


  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-11  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-04 19:02 [PATCH 0/7] uprobes/perf: pre-filtering Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 1/7] perf: Ensure we do not free event->parent before event Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-20 13:35   ` Jiri Olsa
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 2/7] perf: Introduce hw_perf_event->tp_target and ->tp_list Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11  9:44   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 3/7] uprobes: Introduce uprobe_apply() Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11  9:43   ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 4/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to track the active perf_event's Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11  9:45   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:02 ` [PATCH 5/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to pre-filter Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11  9:46   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:03 ` [PATCH 6/7] uprobes/perf: Teach trace_uprobe/perf code to use UPROBE_HANDLER_REMOVE Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11  9:54   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-04 19:03 ` [PATCH 7/7] uprobes/perf: Avoid uprobe_apply() whenever possible Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-11  9:55   ` Srikar Dronamraju
2013-02-06 18:10 ` [PATCH 0/7] uprobes/perf: pre-filtering Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-06 19:42   ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was uprobes/perf: pre-filtering) Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-06 19:42     ` [PATCH 1/1] perf/tools: Fix "perf record -C... workload" behaviour Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-25  9:58       ` Jiri Olsa
2013-02-07  6:01     ` [PATCH 0/1] (Was uprobes/perf: pre-filtering) Namhyung Kim
2013-02-07 15:22       ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130211094353.GD525@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=anton@redhat.com \
    --cc=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=jistone@redhat.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=suzuki@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).