From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, "Matthias Schniedermeyer" <ms@citd.de>,
"Holger Hoffstätte" <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>,
"Jonathan Nieder" <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
"Tilman Schmidt" <tilman@imap.cc>,
kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com,
"Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski" <herton.krzesinski@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: Stable backport request, Was: Re: [regression] external HDD in USB3 enclosure cannot be dynamically removed (Re: Linux 3.7.5)
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 10:11:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130306021107.GA8747@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130305221050.GC8339@xanatos>
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:10:50PM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 08:48:39AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 02:12:50PM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 01:31:29PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 01:08:46PM -0800, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:04:13PM +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> > > > > > On 13.02.2013 11:33, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > > > > Greg,
> > > > >
> > > > > How do you want to handle this? The above four patches should go into
> > > > > 3.8 and stable, but they're not currently in Linus' tree and it's
> > > > > probably too late in the cycle to merge them this week. Should we just
> > > > > wait until 3.9 is out and put the patches into the stable trees then?
> > > >
> > > > > My email shows that the bad commit
> > > > > f7965c0846d74b270e246c1470ca955d5078eb07 has been added to the 3.2, 3.4,
> > > > > and 3.7 stable trees, as well as Canonical's 3.7 stable tree. I'm also
> > > > > fine with just reverting that commit from 3.8 and stable.
> > > >
> > > > It's probably easier at this point in time to just revert that commit,
> > > > leave the stable kernels alone, and then everything will be fixed in
> > > > 3.9. When the commits go into Linus's tree, we can backport everything
> > > > to the stable releases (including 3.8.1) at that point.
> > > >
> > > > As long as someone remembers to send the needed information to
> > > > stable@vger.kernel.org, I know I'll forget :)
> > > >
> > > > Sound ok?
> > >
> > > Yep, sounds fine. I'll attempt to remember to send email to stable once
> > > 3.9 is out.
> >
> > Did this happen yet?
>
> Nope. Here's the upstream commit IDs of the patches that need to be
> backported to stable. Let me know if you need them in patch form:
>
> d3b9d7a9051d7024a93c76a84b2f84b3b66ad6d5 USB: Fix connected device switch to Inactive state.
As this first patch doesn't apply to the 3.8-stable tree, and I can't
figure out how to fix it to work properly, I am going to need these in
patch forme, sorry.
thanks,
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-06 2:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-28 4:56 Linux 3.7.5 Greg KH
2013-01-28 4:57 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <pan.2013.01.28.11.42.16.556318@googlemail.com>
2013-01-28 14:39 ` Greg KH
[not found] ` <pan.2013.01.28.20.33.44.918987@googlemail.com>
2013-01-28 20:46 ` [regression] external HDD in USB3 enclosure cannot be dynamically removed (Re: Linux 3.7.5) Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-12 0:40 ` Sarah Sharp
2013-02-12 0:54 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-02-12 8:36 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2013-02-12 10:35 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2013-02-12 20:42 ` Sarah Sharp
2013-02-13 8:28 ` Holger Hoffstätte
2013-02-13 17:16 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2013-02-13 19:33 ` Sarah Sharp
2013-02-13 20:04 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2013-02-13 21:08 ` Sarah Sharp
2013-02-13 21:31 ` Greg KH
2013-02-13 22:12 ` Sarah Sharp
2013-03-01 16:48 ` Greg KH
2013-03-05 22:10 ` Stable backport request, Was: " Sarah Sharp
2013-03-06 2:11 ` Greg KH [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130306021107.GA8747@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=herton.krzesinski@canonical.com \
--cc=holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lists.ubuntu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ms@citd.de \
--cc=sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tilman@imap.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).