linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Zlatko Calusic <zcalusic@bitsync.net>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	dormando <dormando@rydia.net>,
	Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@hds.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] mm: vmscan: Have kswapd shrink slab only once per priority
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:47:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130321164736.GU6094@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363525456-10448-9-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>

On Sun 17-03-13 13:04:14, Mel Gorman wrote:
> If kswaps fails to make progress but continues to shrink slab then it'll
> either discard all of slab or consume CPU uselessly scanning shrinkers.
> This patch causes kswapd to only call the shrinkers once per priority.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>

OK, looks good.
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>

> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 7d5a932..84375b2 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2661,9 +2661,10 @@ static bool prepare_kswapd_sleep(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, long remaining,
>   */
>  static bool kswapd_shrink_zone(struct zone *zone,
>  			       struct scan_control *sc,
> -			       unsigned long lru_pages)
> +			       unsigned long lru_pages,
> +			       bool shrinking_slab)
>  {
> -	unsigned long nr_slab;
> +	unsigned long nr_slab = 0;
>  	struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
>  	struct shrink_control shrink = {
>  		.gfp_mask = sc->gfp_mask,
> @@ -2673,9 +2674,15 @@ static bool kswapd_shrink_zone(struct zone *zone,
>  	sc->nr_to_reclaim = max(SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX, high_wmark_pages(zone));
>  	shrink_zone(zone, sc);
>  
> -	reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
> -	nr_slab = shrink_slab(&shrink, sc->nr_scanned, lru_pages);
> -	sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
> +	/*
> +	 * Slabs are shrunk for each zone once per priority or if the zone
> +	 * being balanced is otherwise unreclaimable
> +	 */
> +	if (shrinking_slab || !zone_reclaimable(zone)) {
> +		reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
> +		nr_slab = shrink_slab(&shrink, sc->nr_scanned, lru_pages);
> +		sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
> +	}
>  
>  	if (nr_slab == 0 && !zone_reclaimable(zone))
>  		zone->all_unreclaimable = 1;
> @@ -2713,6 +2720,7 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
>  	int end_zone = 0;	/* Inclusive.  0 = ZONE_DMA */
>  	unsigned long nr_soft_reclaimed;
>  	unsigned long nr_soft_scanned;
> +	bool shrinking_slab = true;
>  	struct scan_control sc = {
>  		.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
>  		.priority = DEF_PRIORITY,
> @@ -2861,7 +2869,8 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
>  				 * already being scanned that that high
>  				 * watermark would be met at 100% efficiency.
>  				 */
> -				if (kswapd_shrink_zone(zone, &sc, lru_pages))
> +				if (kswapd_shrink_zone(zone, &sc,
> +						lru_pages, shrinking_slab))
>  					raise_priority = false;
>  
>  				nr_to_reclaim += sc.nr_to_reclaim;
> @@ -2900,6 +2909,9 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
>  				pfmemalloc_watermark_ok(pgdat))
>  			wake_up(&pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait);
>  
> +		/* Only shrink slab once per priority */
> +		shrinking_slab = false;
> +
>  		/*
>  		 * Fragmentation may mean that the system cannot be rebalanced
>  		 * for high-order allocations in all zones. If twice the
> @@ -2925,8 +2937,10 @@ static unsigned long balance_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order,
>  		 * Raise priority if scanning rate is too low or there was no
>  		 * progress in reclaiming pages
>  		 */
> -		if (raise_priority || !this_reclaimed)
> +		if (raise_priority || !this_reclaimed) {
>  			sc.priority--;
> +			shrinking_slab = true;
> +		}
>  	} while (sc.priority >= 1 &&
>  		 !pgdat_balanced(pgdat, order, *classzone_idx));
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4
> 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-21 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 123+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-17 13:04 [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm: vmscan: Limit the number of pages kswapd reclaims at each priority Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 23:53   ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19  9:55     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 10:16       ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 10:59         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-20 16:18   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21  0:52     ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-22  0:08       ` Will Huck
2013-03-21  9:47     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 12:59       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21  0:51   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 15:57   ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-21 16:47     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22  0:05     ` Will Huck
2013-03-22  3:52       ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-22  3:56         ` Will Huck
2013-03-22  4:59           ` Will Huck
2013-03-22 13:01             ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-05  0:05               ` Will Huck
2013-04-07  7:32                 ` Will Huck
2013-04-07  7:35                 ` Will Huck
2013-04-11  5:54         ` Will Huck
2013-04-11  5:58         ` Will Huck
2013-04-12  5:46           ` Ric Mason
2013-04-12  9:34             ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-12 13:40               ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-25  9:07   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-25  9:13     ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-28 22:31       ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-29  8:22         ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-30 22:07           ` Jiri Slaby
2013-04-02 11:15             ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm: vmscan: Obey proportional scanning requirements for kswapd Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:39   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:08     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21  1:10   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21  9:54     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 14:01   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 14:31     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:07       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 15:34         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22  7:54           ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22  8:37             ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 10:04               ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-22 10:47                 ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 16:25   ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-21 18:02     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 16:53       ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-22 18:25         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 19:09           ` Johannes Weiner
2013-03-22 19:46             ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm: vmscan: Flatten kswapd priority loop Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:36   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:09     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 23:58   ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 10:12     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19  3:08   ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19  8:23     ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-19 10:14     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-19 10:26       ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 11:01         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 14:54   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 15:26     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:38       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm: vmscan: Decide whether to compact the pgdat based on reclaim progress Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 11:35   ` Hillf Danton
2013-03-19 10:27     ` Mel Gorman
     [not found]   ` <20130318111130.GA7245@hacker.(null)>
2013-03-19 10:19     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:32   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 15:47     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 15:50       ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm: vmscan: Do not allow kswapd to scan at maximum priority Mel Gorman
2013-03-21  1:20   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 10:12     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 12:30       ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 15:48   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm: vmscan: Have kswapd writeback pages based on dirty pages encountered, not priority Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:42   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:11     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 17:53       ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-21 18:15         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 18:21           ` Rik van Riel
     [not found]   ` <20130318110850.GA7144@hacker.(null)>
2013-03-19 10:35     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm: vmscan: Block kswapd if it is encountering pages under writeback Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:49   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:19     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 15:40       ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-19 11:06         ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-18 11:37   ` Simon Jeons
2013-03-19 10:57     ` Mel Gorman
     [not found]   ` <20130318115827.GB7245@hacker.(null)>
2013-03-19 10:58     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 16:32   ` [PATCH 07/10 -v2r1] " Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 18:42   ` [PATCH 07/10] " Rik van Riel
2013-03-22  8:27     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm: vmscan: Have kswapd shrink slab only once per priority Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:53   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-21 16:47   ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2013-03-21 19:47   ` Rik van Riel
2013-04-09  6:53   ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-09  8:41     ` Simon Jeons
2013-04-09 11:13     ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-10  1:07       ` Dave Chinner
2013-04-10  5:23         ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-11  9:53         ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-10  5:21       ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-11 10:01         ` Mel Gorman
2013-04-11 10:29           ` Ric Mason
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm: vmscan: Check if kswapd should writepage " Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 16:58   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 18:07     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 19:52   ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-17 13:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm: vmscan: Move logic from balance_pgdat() to kswapd_shrink_zone() Mel Gorman
2013-03-17 14:55   ` Andi Kleen
2013-03-17 15:25     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-21 17:18   ` Michal Hocko
2013-03-21 18:13     ` Mel Gorman
2013-03-22 14:37 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd Mel Gorman
2013-03-24 19:00 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-25  8:17   ` Michal Hocko
2013-04-09 11:06 [PATCH 0/10] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd V2 Mel Gorman
2013-04-09 11:07 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm: vmscan: Have kswapd shrink slab only once per priority Mel Gorman
2013-04-11 19:57 [PATCH 0/10] Reduce system disruption due to kswapd V3 Mel Gorman
2013-04-11 19:57 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm: vmscan: Have kswapd shrink slab only once per priority Mel Gorman
2013-04-18 16:43   ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130321164736.GU6094@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
    --cc=dormando@rydia.net \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=satoru.moriya@hds.com \
    --cc=zcalusic@bitsync.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).