linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@nvidia.com>,
	"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>, Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com>,
	"devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/12] Tegra114 clockframework
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 20:52:06 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130404175206.GD18519@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130219185034.27993.86892@quantum>

Hi Mike,

> Quoting Stephen Warren (2013-02-19 10:39:35)
> > On 02/15/2013 05:36 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > > This is the seventh version of the Tegra114 clockframework. It is based on the
> > > for-next branch of
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/swarren/linux-tegra.git and
> > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg220452.html.
> > 
> > Mike,
> > 
> > I think it'd be prudent to take this series through the Tegra tree again
> > for 3.10; patch 11 needs to go in as part of the series due to internal
> > dependencies, and I'm slightly worried that other Tegra DT changes might
> > conflict with that patch (if only for context). Taking this series (and
> > any other Tegra clk driver changes for 3.10) through the Tegra tree
> > could resolve that easily. Do you have a problem with that?
> > 
> 
> I was thinking the same thing.  I'll make time to review these now that
> 3.8 is out.
> 

I posted v9 of this yesterday (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-tegra/msg10891.html)
and posted a small binding doc update today 
'[PATCH v9b 10/14] ARM: tegra: Define Tegra114 CAR binding'. Can you ack these so
Stephen can take them in the Tegra tree?

Thanks!

Peter.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-04 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-15 12:36 [PATCH v7 00/12] Tegra114 clockframework Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-15 12:36 ` [PATCH v7 01/12] clk: tegra: provide dummy cpu car ops Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-15 12:36 ` [PATCH v7 02/12] clk: tegra: Refactor PLL programming code Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-15 12:36 ` [PATCH v7 03/12] clk: tegra: Add TEGRA_PLL_BYPASS flag Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-15 12:36 ` [PATCH v7 04/12] clk: tegra: Add PLL post divider table Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-15 12:36 ` [PATCH v7 05/12] clk: tegra: Add new fields and PLL types for Tegra114 Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-15 12:36 ` [PATCH v7 06/12] clk: tegra: Add flags to tegra_clk_periph() Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-15 12:36 ` [PATCH v7 07/12] clk: tegra: Workaround for Tegra114 MSENC problem Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-15 12:36 ` [PATCH v7 08/12] ARM: tegra: Define Tegra114 CAR binding Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-15 12:36 ` [PATCH v7 09/12] clk: tegra: Implement clocks for Tegra114 Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-15 12:36 ` [PATCH v7 10/12] clk: tegra: devicetree match for nvidia,tegra114-car Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-15 12:36 ` [PATCH v7 11/12] ARM: dt: Add references to tegra_car clocks Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-15 12:36 ` [PATCH v7 12/12] clk: tegra: Remove forced clk_enable of uartd Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-18 15:40 ` [PATCH v7 00/12] Tegra114 clockframework Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-19 18:39 ` Stephen Warren
2013-02-19 18:50   ` Mike Turquette
2013-04-04 17:52     ` Peter De Schrijver [this message]
2013-02-21 12:58   ` Prashant Gaikwad

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130404175206.GD18519@tbergstrom-lnx.Nvidia.com \
    --to=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=josephl@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
    --cc=pgaikwad@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=sjg@chromium.org \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).