From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/2] (arm-soc for v3.10) arm: introduce psci_smp_ops
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 19:28:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130502182812.GD14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1305021816490.5398@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:20:32PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 2 May 2013, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi Stefano,
> >
> > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:12:12PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > ping
> >
> > Is this a ping to have this pulled into Russell's tree?
>
> I thought that we agreed that the patches should go via the arm-soc
> tree, after Russell acks them.
Okay, well, is there a reason for them to go through arm-soc? They
look more like core code to me than SoC specific - they only minimally
touch mach-virt.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-02 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-30 16:17 [PATCH v10 0/2] (arm-soc for v3.10) arm: introduce psci_smp_ops Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-30 16:18 ` [PATCH v10 1/2] " Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-30 16:18 ` [PATCH v10 2/2] ARM: Enable selection of SMP operations at boot time Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 17:12 ` [PATCH v10 0/2] (arm-soc for v3.10) arm: introduce psci_smp_ops Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 17:15 ` Will Deacon
2013-05-02 17:20 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 18:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-02 18:23 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 18:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-05-02 18:42 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 18:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-02 19:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-02 20:34 ` Olof Johansson
2013-05-03 1:51 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130502182812.GD14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).