From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/2] (arm-soc for v3.10) arm: introduce psci_smp_ops
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 21:03:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201305022103.58445.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130502184801.GF14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Thursday 02 May 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> The only issue that there is is where we are in the development cycle
> (almost mid merge window), and I've yet to push anything to Linus thanks
> to late discovery of various messups in other chunks of code submitted
> via my tree - I'm starting to drop stuff from my tree in the hope that
> I'll get back to something that's going to be suitable for mainline.
>
> I really don't want to go pulling anything else at the moment in the
> hope of getting what I currently have out the door.
>
> And in any case, we shouldn't be adding any new code to our trees at
> this point in time.
Agreed. I would have like to see the patches in 3.10, but the timing
didn't work out.
Stefano, I'm sure we can queue it up early for 3.11 if you send them
again after the merge window. Sorry you had to go through 10 versions
and not getting it merged in time in the end.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-02 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-30 16:17 [PATCH v10 0/2] (arm-soc for v3.10) arm: introduce psci_smp_ops Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-30 16:18 ` [PATCH v10 1/2] " Stefano Stabellini
2013-04-30 16:18 ` [PATCH v10 2/2] ARM: Enable selection of SMP operations at boot time Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 17:12 ` [PATCH v10 0/2] (arm-soc for v3.10) arm: introduce psci_smp_ops Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 17:15 ` Will Deacon
2013-05-02 17:20 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 18:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-02 18:23 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 18:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-02 18:42 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-05-02 18:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-02 19:03 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-05-02 20:34 ` Olof Johansson
2013-05-03 1:51 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201305022103.58445.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).