* [PATCH RESEND 1/2] mm/zswap: bugfix: memory leak when invalidate and reclaim occur concurrently
@ 2013-10-24 9:51 Weijie Yang
2013-10-25 10:15 ` Minchan Kim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Weijie Yang @ 2013-10-24 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akpm
Cc: sjennings, 'Minchan Kim',
bob.liu, weijie.yang.kh, linux-mm, linux-kernel, stable
Consider the following scenario:
thread 0: reclaim entry x (get refcount, but not call zswap_get_swap_cache_page)
thread 1: call zswap_frontswap_invalidate_page to invalidate entry x.
finished, entry x and its zbud is not freed as its refcount != 0
now, the swap_map[x] = 0
thread 0: now call zswap_get_swap_cache_page
swapcache_prepare return -ENOENT because entry x is not used any more
zswap_get_swap_cache_page return ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_NOMEM
zswap_writeback_entry do nothing except put refcount
Now, the memory of zswap_entry x and its zpage leak.
Modify:
- check the refcount in fail path, free memory if it is not referenced.
- use ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_FAIL instead of ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_NOMEM as the fail path
can be not only caused by nomem but also by invalidate.
Signed-off-by: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Acked-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/zswap.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
mode change 100644 => 100755 mm/zswap.c
diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
index d93510c..6b86251
--- a/mm/zswap.c
+++ b/mm/zswap.c
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static void zswap_free_entry(struct zswap_tree *tree, struct zswap_entry *entry)
enum zswap_get_swap_ret {
ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_NEW,
ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_EXIST,
- ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_NOMEM
+ ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_FAIL,
};
/*
@@ -401,9 +401,10 @@ enum zswap_get_swap_ret {
* added to the swap cache, and returned in retpage.
*
* If success, the swap cache page is returned in retpage
- * Returns 0 if page was already in the swap cache, page is not locked
- * Returns 1 if the new page needs to be populated, page is locked
- * Returns <0 on error
+ * Returns ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_EXIST if page was already in the swap cache
+ * Returns ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_NEW if the new page needs to be populated,
+ * the new page is added to swapcache and locked
+ * Returns ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_FAIL on error
*/
static int zswap_get_swap_cache_page(swp_entry_t entry,
struct page **retpage)
@@ -475,7 +476,7 @@ static int zswap_get_swap_cache_page(swp_entry_t entry,
if (new_page)
page_cache_release(new_page);
if (!found_page)
- return ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_NOMEM;
+ return ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_FAIL;
*retpage = found_page;
return ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_EXIST;
}
@@ -529,11 +530,11 @@ static int zswap_writeback_entry(struct zbud_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
/* try to allocate swap cache page */
switch (zswap_get_swap_cache_page(swpentry, &page)) {
- case ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_NOMEM: /* no memory */
+ case ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_FAIL: /* no memory or invalidate happened */
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto fail;
- case ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_EXIST: /* page is unlocked */
+ case ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_EXIST:
/* page is already in the swap cache, ignore for now */
page_cache_release(page);
ret = -EEXIST;
@@ -591,7 +592,12 @@ static int zswap_writeback_entry(struct zbud_pool *pool, unsigned long handle)
fail:
spin_lock(&tree->lock);
- zswap_entry_put(entry);
+ refcount = zswap_entry_put(entry);
+ if (refcount <= 0) {
+ /* invalidate happened, consider writeback as success */
+ zswap_free_entry(tree, entry);
+ ret = 0;
+ }
spin_unlock(&tree->lock);
return ret;
}
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] mm/zswap: bugfix: memory leak when invalidate and reclaim occur concurrently
2013-10-24 9:51 [PATCH RESEND 1/2] mm/zswap: bugfix: memory leak when invalidate and reclaim occur concurrently Weijie Yang
@ 2013-10-25 10:15 ` Minchan Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Minchan Kim @ 2013-10-25 10:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Weijie Yang
Cc: akpm, sjennings, bob.liu, weijie.yang.kh, linux-mm, linux-kernel, stable
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 05:51:11PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote:
> Consider the following scenario:
> thread 0: reclaim entry x (get refcount, but not call zswap_get_swap_cache_page)
> thread 1: call zswap_frontswap_invalidate_page to invalidate entry x.
> finished, entry x and its zbud is not freed as its refcount != 0
> now, the swap_map[x] = 0
> thread 0: now call zswap_get_swap_cache_page
> swapcache_prepare return -ENOENT because entry x is not used any more
> zswap_get_swap_cache_page return ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_NOMEM
> zswap_writeback_entry do nothing except put refcount
> Now, the memory of zswap_entry x and its zpage leak.
>
> Modify:
> - check the refcount in fail path, free memory if it is not referenced.
>
> - use ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_FAIL instead of ZSWAP_SWAPCACHE_NOMEM as the fail path
> can be not only caused by nomem but also by invalidate.
>
> Signed-off-by: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Thanks, Weijie!
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-10-25 10:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-24 9:51 [PATCH RESEND 1/2] mm/zswap: bugfix: memory leak when invalidate and reclaim occur concurrently Weijie Yang
2013-10-25 10:15 ` Minchan Kim
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).