From: "Antoine Ténart" <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
Cc: "sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com"
<sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>,
"linus.walleij@linaro.org" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com"
<alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
Jimmy Xu <zmxu@marvell.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/5] pinctrl: berlin: add a pinctrl driver for Marvell Berlin SoCs
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2014 11:21:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140411092157.GD20147@kwain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140411162716.74e739e1@xhacker>
Jisheng,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 04:27:16PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> Hi Antoine,
>
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 01:18:39 -0700
> Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jisheng,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 02:44:31PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 06:07:51 -0700
> > > Antoine Ténart <antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > > > +static int berlin_pinmux_enable(struct pinctrl_dev *pctrl_dev,
> > > > + unsigned function,
> > > > + unsigned group)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct berlin_pinctrl *pctrl =
> > > > pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctrl_dev);
> > > > + struct berlin_pinctrl_group *group_desc = pctrl->groups + group;
> > > > + struct berlin_pinctrl_function *function_desc =
> > > > + pctrl->functions + function;
> > > > + unsigned long flags;
> > > > + u32 regval;
> > > > +
> > > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&pctrl->lock, flags);
> > > > +
> > > > + regval = readl(group_desc->reg);
> > > > + regval &= group_desc->mask;
> > > > + regval |= function_desc->muxval << group_desc->lsb;
> > > > + writel(regval, group_desc->reg);
> > >
> > > Could we use relaxed version instead?
> >
> > We could, but this is not a performance issue here at all, so I guess we can
> > keep writel().
>
> Yes it's not a performance issue here but an issue for the system which is doing
> PL310 L2 cache maintenance. If pinmux operation hold the l2x0_lock due to writel()
> the important video/audio process which is cleaning PL310 cache must wait, thus
> cause jitter. So I'd like relaxed version if we can. Then I don't need to add this
> patch to mainline kernel when we upgrade internal tree.
I'm not sure I got that. As I understand it, you will need to play video/audio
*while* configuring the pinmux. But the pinmuxing configuration is done at boot
time, and I don't think a video/audio is being played then. So I'm not certain a
jitter will appear. What do you think ?
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-11 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-10 13:07 [PATCH RESEND 0/5] ARM: berlin: add pinctrl support Antoine Ténart
2014-04-10 13:07 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/5] pinctrl: allows not to define the get_group_pins operation Antoine Ténart
2014-04-11 9:21 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-04-22 12:48 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-22 15:58 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-10 13:07 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/5] pinctrl: berlin: add a pinctrl driver for Marvell Berlin SoCs Antoine Ténart
2014-04-11 6:44 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-04-11 8:18 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-11 8:27 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-04-11 9:21 ` Antoine Ténart [this message]
2014-04-11 9:03 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-04-11 12:37 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-11 13:35 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-04-22 12:52 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-22 15:56 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-23 14:05 ` Linus Walleij
2014-04-10 13:07 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/5] ARM: berlin: add the pinctrl dependency for the " Antoine Ténart
2014-04-11 9:05 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-04-17 13:13 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-17 13:24 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-04-10 13:07 ` [PATCH RESEND 4/5] Documentation: add the Marvell Berlin pinctrl documentation Antoine Ténart
2014-04-11 6:33 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-04-11 8:12 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-11 8:18 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-04-11 8:22 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-04-11 9:13 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2014-04-10 13:07 ` [PATCH RESEND 5/5] ARM: dts: berlin: add the pinctrl node and muxing setup for uarts Antoine Ténart
2014-04-11 8:18 ` Andrew Lunn
2014-04-11 9:09 ` Antoine Ténart
2014-04-11 9:19 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140411092157.GD20147@kwain \
--to=antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=zmxu@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).