From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
acme@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: Implement lbr-as-callgraph v9
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:24:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140813072449.GA2370@krava.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140812205524.GF4120@two.firstfloor.org>
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:55:24PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:50:17PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:17:00AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > > v5:
> > > - Rename functions
> > > - Fix gtk build problem
> > > - Fix crash without -g
> > > - Improve error messages
> > > - Improve srcline display in various ways
> > > v6:
> > > - Port to latest perf/core
> > > v7:
> > > - Really port to latest perf/core
> > > v8:
> > > - Rebased on 3.16-rc1
> > > v9:
> > > - Forward ported to latest tip/perf/core
> > >
> > > Example output:
> > >
> > > % perf record -b -g ./tsrc/tcall
> >
> > Why do we need the '-g' in here.. '-b' should be enough right?
> > I saw u fill the rest of the backtrace with callchain
> > data (if needed), but thats not necessary right?
>
> Right now the callgraph processing needs -g to enable itself.
> I didn't try to fix it so far because we likely use -g in these
> situations where --branch-history is useful.
>
> If you think it's important it could be fixed I think.
>
> >
> >
> > > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.044 MB perf.data (~1923 samples) ]
> > > % perf report --branch-history
> >
> > When I captured data like you above and run pure 'perf report'
> > I did not get callchains displayed at all.
> >
> > Also using 'perf report --branch-history' enables filename:line
> > suffix for callchain regardless of using '-b' for data capture
>
> That's fine isn't it? If the user specifies that option
> they should have used -b.
>
> Or do you mean it should only do it for branch entries?
> Right now the callgraph code doesn't distinguish between branch
> entry and callgraph entry, so it can't know.
my concern was that '--branch-history' is changing report output
even if there's no branch data.. but thats minor one, the bigger
one is this:
> > When I captured data like you above and run pure 'perf report'
> > I did not get callchains displayed at all.
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-13 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-31 17:17 Implement lbr-as-callgraph v9 Andi Kleen
2014-07-31 17:17 ` [PATCH 1/9] perf, tools: Support handling complete branch stacks as histograms Andi Kleen
2014-07-31 17:17 ` [PATCH 2/9] perf, tools: Add --branch-history option to report Andi Kleen
2014-07-31 17:17 ` [PATCH 3/9] perf, tools: Enable printing the srcline in the history Andi Kleen
2014-07-31 17:17 ` [PATCH 4/9] perf, tools: Only print base source file for srcline Andi Kleen
2014-07-31 17:17 ` [PATCH 5/9] perf, tools: Support source line numbers in annotate Andi Kleen
2014-07-31 17:17 ` [PATCH 6/9] perf, tools: Fix srcline sort key output to use width Andi Kleen
2014-07-31 17:17 ` [PATCH 7/9] tools, perf: Make get_srcline fall back to sym+offset Andi Kleen
2014-07-31 17:17 ` [PATCH 8/9] tools, perf: Make srcline output address with -v Andi Kleen
2014-07-31 17:17 ` [PATCH 9/9] tools, perf: Add asprintf replacement Andi Kleen
2014-08-11 9:52 ` Implement lbr-as-callgraph v9 Jiri Olsa
2014-08-11 16:40 ` Andi Kleen
2014-08-12 13:50 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-08-12 20:55 ` Andi Kleen
2014-08-13 7:24 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2014-08-13 18:24 ` Andi Kleen
2014-08-14 10:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2014-09-15 23:54 Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140813072449.GA2370@krava.brq.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).