linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Updated Broadwell perf patchkit
@ 2014-08-14  1:17 Andi Kleen
  2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Remove incorrect model number from Haswell perf Andi Kleen
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2014-08-14  1:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, eranian

Addressed the earlier review feedback. Also changed Haswell to use
the Broadwell cache event list, which is far more correct for it
than Sandy Bridge's.

-Andi


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Remove incorrect model number from Haswell perf
  2014-08-14  1:17 Updated Broadwell perf patchkit Andi Kleen
@ 2014-08-14  1:17 ` Andi Kleen
  2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Document all Haswell models Andi Kleen
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2014-08-14  1:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, eranian, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 2502d0d..ef6c8b7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -2541,7 +2541,6 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 
 	case 60: /* Haswell Client */
 	case 70:
-	case 71:
 	case 63:
 	case 69:
 		x86_pmu.late_ack = true;
-- 
1.9.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Document all Haswell models
  2014-08-14  1:17 Updated Broadwell perf patchkit Andi Kleen
  2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Remove incorrect model number from Haswell perf Andi Kleen
@ 2014-08-14  1:17 ` Andi Kleen
  2014-08-14  7:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
  2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf, x86: Add Broadwell core support Andi Kleen
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2014-08-14  1:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, eranian, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Add names for each Haswell model as requested by Peter.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index ef6c8b7..03befdd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -2540,9 +2540,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 
 
 	case 60: /* Haswell Client */
-	case 70:
-	case 63:
-	case 69:
+	case 70: /* Crystall Well */
+	case 63: /* Haswell Server */
+	case 69: /* Haswell ULT */
 		x86_pmu.late_ack = true;
 		memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, snb_hw_cache_event_ids, sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
 		memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, snb_hw_cache_extra_regs, sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs));
-- 
1.9.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/5] perf, x86: Add Broadwell core support
  2014-08-14  1:17 Updated Broadwell perf patchkit Andi Kleen
  2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Remove incorrect model number from Haswell perf Andi Kleen
  2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Document all Haswell models Andi Kleen
@ 2014-08-14  1:17 ` Andi Kleen
  2014-08-14  7:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
  2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds Andi Kleen
  2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf, x86: Use Broadwell cache event list for Haswell Andi Kleen
  4 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2014-08-14  1:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, eranian, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Add Broadwell support for Broadwell Client to perf.
This is very similar to Haswell.  It uses a new cache event table,
because there were various changes there.

The constraint list has one new event that needs to be handled over Haswell.

The PEBS event list is the same, so we reuse Haswell's.

v2: Remove unnamed model numbers.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 150 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 03befdd..4bfb0ec 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -220,6 +220,15 @@ static struct event_constraint intel_hsw_event_constraints[] = {
 	EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END
 };
 
+struct event_constraint intel_bdw_event_constraints[] = {
+	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x00c0, 0),	/* INST_RETIRED.ANY */
+	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x003c, 1),	/* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.CORE */
+	FIXED_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x0300, 2),	/* CPU_CLK_UNHALTED.REF */
+	INTEL_UEVENT_CONSTRAINT(0x148, 0x4),	/* L1D_PEND_MISS.PENDING */
+	INTEL_EVENT_CONSTRAINT(0xa3, 0x4),	/* CYCLE_ACTIVITY.* */
+	EVENT_CONSTRAINT_END
+};
+
 static u64 intel_pmu_event_map(int hw_event)
 {
 	return intel_perfmon_event_map[hw_event];
@@ -415,6 +424,126 @@ static __initconst const u64 snb_hw_cache_event_ids
 
 };
 
+static __initconst const u64 bdw_hw_cache_event_ids
+				[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
+				[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
+				[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] =
+{
+ [ C(L1D ) ] = {
+	[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x81d0, 	/* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.ALL_LOADS */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x151, 	/* L1D.REPLACEMENT */
+	},
+	[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x82d0, 	/* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.ALL_STORES */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0,
+	},
+	[ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0,
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0,
+	},
+ },
+ [ C(L1I ) ] = {
+	[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0,
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x280, 	/* ICACHE.MISSES */
+	},
+	[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = -1,
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = -1,
+	},
+	[ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0,
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0,
+	},
+ },
+ [ C(LL  ) ] = {
+	[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+		/* OFFCORE_RESPONSE:ALL_DATA_RD|ALL_CODE_RD */
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x1b7,
+		/* OFFCORE_RESPONSE:ALL_DATA_RD|ALL_CODE_RD|SUPPLIER_NONE|
+                   L3_MISS|ANY_SNOOP */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x1b7,
+	},
+	[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x1b7, 	/* OFFCORE_RESPONSE:ALL_RFO */
+		/* OFFCORE_RESPONSE:ALL_RFO|SUPPLIER_NONE|L3_MISS|ANY_SNOOP */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x1b7,
+	},
+	[ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0,
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0,
+	},
+ },
+ [ C(DTLB) ] = {
+	[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x81d0, 	/* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.ALL_LOADS */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x108, 	/* DTLB_LOAD_MISSES.MISS_CAUSES_A_WALK */
+	},
+	[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x82d0, 	/* MEM_UOPS_RETIRED.ALL_STORES */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x149, 	/* DTLB_STORE_MISSES.MISS_CAUSES_A_WALK */
+	},
+	[ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0,
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0,
+	},
+ },
+ [ C(ITLB) ] = {
+	[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x6085, 	/* ITLB_MISSES.STLB_HIT */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x185, 	/* ITLB_MISSES.MISS_CAUSES_A_WALK */
+	},
+	[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = -1,
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = -1,
+	},
+	[ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = -1,
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = -1,
+	},
+ },
+ [ C(BPU ) ] = {
+	[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0xc4, 	/* BR_INST_RETIRED.ALL_BRANCHES */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0xc5, 	/* BR_MISP_RETIRED.ALL_BRANCHES */
+	},
+	[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = -1,
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = -1,
+	},
+	[ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = -1,
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = -1,
+	},
+ },
+};
+
+static __initconst const u64 bdw_hw_cache_extra_regs
+				[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
+				[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
+				[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX] =
+{
+ [ C(LL  ) ] = {
+	[ C(OP_READ) ] = {
+		/* OFFCORE_RESPONSE:ALL_DATA_RD|ALL_CODE_RD */
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x2d5,
+		/* OFFCORE_RESPONSE:ALL_DATA_RD|ALL_CODE_RD|SUPPLIER_NONE|
+                   L3_MISS|ANY_SNOOP */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x3fbc0202d5,
+	},
+	[ C(OP_WRITE) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x122, 	/* OFFCORE_RESPONSE:ALL_RFO */
+		/* OFFCORE_RESPONSE:ALL_RFO|SUPPLIER_NONE|L3_MISS|ANY_SNOOP */
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x3fbc020122,
+	},
+	[ C(OP_PREFETCH) ] = {
+		[ C(RESULT_ACCESS) ] = 0x0,
+		[ C(RESULT_MISS)   ] = 0x0,
+	},
+ },
+};
+
 static __initconst const u64 westmere_hw_cache_event_ids
 				[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
 				[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
@@ -2564,6 +2693,27 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		pr_cont("Haswell events, ");
 		break;
 
+	case 61: /* Broadwell Client */
+		x86_pmu.late_ack = true;
+		memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, bdw_hw_cache_event_ids, sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
+		memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, bdw_hw_cache_extra_regs, sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs));
+
+		intel_pmu_lbr_init_snb();
+
+		x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_bdw_event_constraints;
+		x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_hsw_pebs_event_constraints;
+		x86_pmu.extra_regs = intel_snbep_extra_regs;
+		x86_pmu.pebs_aliases = intel_pebs_aliases_snb;
+		/* all extra regs are per-cpu when HT is on */
+		x86_pmu.er_flags |= ERF_HAS_RSP_1;
+		x86_pmu.er_flags |= ERF_NO_HT_SHARING;
+
+		x86_pmu.hw_config = hsw_hw_config;
+		x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = hsw_get_event_constraints;
+		x86_pmu.cpu_events = hsw_events_attrs;
+		pr_cont("Broadwell events, ");
+		break;
+
 	default:
 		switch (x86_pmu.version) {
 		case 1:
-- 
1.9.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds
  2014-08-14  1:17 Updated Broadwell perf patchkit Andi Kleen
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf, x86: Add Broadwell core support Andi Kleen
@ 2014-08-14  1:17 ` Andi Kleen
  2014-08-14  4:46   ` Stephane Eranian
  2014-08-14  7:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
  2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf, x86: Use Broadwell cache event list for Haswell Andi Kleen
  4 siblings, 2 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2014-08-14  1:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, eranian, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

On Broadwell INST_RETIRED.ALL cannot be used with any period
that doesn't have the lowest 6 bits cleared. And the period
should not be smaller than 128.

Add a new callback to enforce this, and set it for Broadwell.

This is erratum BDM57 and BDM11.

v2: Use correct event name in description. Use EVENT() macro.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c       |  3 +++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h       |  1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 0adc5e3..a0adf58 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -980,6 +980,9 @@ int x86_perf_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (left > x86_pmu.max_period)
 		left = x86_pmu.max_period;
 
+	if (x86_pmu.limit_period)
+		left = x86_pmu.limit_period(event, left);
+
 	per_cpu(pmc_prev_left[idx], smp_processor_id()) = left;
 
 	/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
index de81627..a46e391 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -456,6 +456,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	struct x86_pmu_quirk *quirks;
 	int		perfctr_second_write;
 	bool		late_ack;
+	unsigned	(*limit_period)(struct perf_event *event, unsigned l);
 
 	/*
 	 * sysfs attrs
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 4bfb0ec..66260e1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -2034,6 +2034,24 @@ hsw_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
 	return c;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Broadwell:
+ * The INST_RETIRED.ALL period always needs to have lowest
+ * 6bits cleared (BDM57). It shall not use a period smaller
+ * than 100 (BDM11). We combine the two to enforce
+ * a min-period of 128.
+ */
+static unsigned bdw_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, unsigned left)
+{
+	if ((event->hw.config & 0xffff) ==
+			X86_CONFIG(.event=0xc0, .umask=0x01)) {
+		if (left < 128)
+			left = 128;
+		left &= ~0x3fu;
+	}
+	return left;
+}
+
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event,	"config:0-7"	);
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(umask,	"config:8-15"	);
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(edge,	"config:18"	);
@@ -2711,6 +2729,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		x86_pmu.hw_config = hsw_hw_config;
 		x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = hsw_get_event_constraints;
 		x86_pmu.cpu_events = hsw_events_attrs;
+		x86_pmu.limit_period = bdw_limit_period;
 		pr_cont("Broadwell events, ");
 		break;
 
-- 
1.9.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 5/5] perf, x86: Use Broadwell cache event list for Haswell
  2014-08-14  1:17 Updated Broadwell perf patchkit Andi Kleen
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds Andi Kleen
@ 2014-08-14  1:17 ` Andi Kleen
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2014-08-14  1:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, eranian, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Use the newly added Broadwell cache event list for Haswell too.
They are identical, but Haswell is very different from the Sandy Bridge
list that was used previously. That fixes a wide range of mis-counting
cache events.

The prefetch events are gone now. They way the hardware counts
them is very misleading (some prefetches included, others not), so
it seemed best to leave them out.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 66260e1..178ddc0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -2691,8 +2691,8 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 	case 63: /* Haswell Server */
 	case 69: /* Haswell ULT */
 		x86_pmu.late_ack = true;
-		memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, snb_hw_cache_event_ids, sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
-		memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, snb_hw_cache_extra_regs, sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs));
+		memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, bdw_hw_cache_event_ids, sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
+		memcpy(hw_cache_extra_regs, bdw_hw_cache_extra_regs, sizeof(hw_cache_extra_regs));
 
 		intel_pmu_lbr_init_snb();
 
-- 
1.9.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds
  2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds Andi Kleen
@ 2014-08-14  4:46   ` Stephane Eranian
  2014-08-14 14:30     ` Andi Kleen
  2014-08-14  7:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Stephane Eranian @ 2014-08-14  4:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, LKML, Ingo Molnar, Andi Kleen

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:17 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
>
> On Broadwell INST_RETIRED.ALL cannot be used with any period
> that doesn't have the lowest 6 bits cleared. And the period
> should not be smaller than 128.
>
If you have frequency mode enabled, then I suspect this works okay.
It may be that the kernel will keep trying to set a period lower than 128
but you will correct it.

I am more worried about the case where the user sets a fixed period
with some of the bottom 6 bits set.  The apps thinks it is sampling at
X occurences per sample, when it is in fact at X - 63 (worst case).
I think this would be okay, if there was a trace of this in the sampling
buffer, i.e., PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD. But I recall that perf record
does not request this flag when using a fixed period. So no way
of knowing what the actual period was, at least when using the
perf tool. I understand also that for this event, 64 occurrences
may not matter as much, maybe except if you use some filters
such as cmask.


> Add a new callback to enforce this, and set it for Broadwell.
>
> This is erratum BDM57 and BDM11.
>
> v2: Use correct event name in description. Use EVENT() macro.
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c       |  3 +++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h       |  1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> index 0adc5e3..a0adf58 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
> @@ -980,6 +980,9 @@ int x86_perf_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event)
>         if (left > x86_pmu.max_period)
>                 left = x86_pmu.max_period;
>
> +       if (x86_pmu.limit_period)
> +               left = x86_pmu.limit_period(event, left);
> +
>         per_cpu(pmc_prev_left[idx], smp_processor_id()) = left;
>
>         /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
> index de81627..a46e391 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
> @@ -456,6 +456,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
>         struct x86_pmu_quirk *quirks;
>         int             perfctr_second_write;
>         bool            late_ack;
> +       unsigned        (*limit_period)(struct perf_event *event, unsigned l);
>
>         /*
>          * sysfs attrs
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> index 4bfb0ec..66260e1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> @@ -2034,6 +2034,24 @@ hsw_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
>         return c;
>  }
>
> +/*
> + * Broadwell:
> + * The INST_RETIRED.ALL period always needs to have lowest
> + * 6bits cleared (BDM57). It shall not use a period smaller
> + * than 100 (BDM11). We combine the two to enforce
> + * a min-period of 128.
> + */
> +static unsigned bdw_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, unsigned left)
> +{
> +       if ((event->hw.config & 0xffff) ==
> +                       X86_CONFIG(.event=0xc0, .umask=0x01)) {
> +               if (left < 128)
> +                       left = 128;
> +               left &= ~0x3fu;
> +       }
> +       return left;
> +}
> +
>  PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event, "config:0-7"    );
>  PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(umask, "config:8-15"   );
>  PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(edge,  "config:18"     );
> @@ -2711,6 +2729,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>                 x86_pmu.hw_config = hsw_hw_config;
>                 x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = hsw_get_event_constraints;
>                 x86_pmu.cpu_events = hsw_events_attrs;
> +               x86_pmu.limit_period = bdw_limit_period;
>                 pr_cont("Broadwell events, ");
>                 break;
>
> --
> 1.9.3
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Document all Haswell models
  2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Document all Haswell models Andi Kleen
@ 2014-08-14  7:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
  2014-08-14 15:00     ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2014-08-14  7:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, eranian, Andi Kleen

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1385 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:17:46PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Add names for each Haswell model as requested by Peter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> index ef6c8b7..03befdd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
> @@ -2540,9 +2540,9 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
>  
>  
>  	case 60: /* Haswell Client */
> +	case 70: /* Crystall Well */
> +	case 63: /* Haswell Server */
> +	case 69: /* Haswell ULT */

So I googled Crystalwell, and I'm not sure I understand; is that
Haswell-H + GT3e or it that Haswell + GT3e, the distinction being that
there are also Desktop parts with Iris Pro 5200, such like the
Haswell-R.

Haswell Server, is that the single socket one, or is it like IVB both
the EP and EX parts?

And is 69 only the ULT or also the ULX parts?

Would something like this be accurate:?

	case 60: /* 22nm Haswell                        */
	case 70: /* 22nm Haswell + GT3e (Iris Pro 5200) */
	case 69: /* 22nm Haswell ULT                    */
	case 63: /* 22nm Haswell-EP/EX                  */



[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf, x86: Add Broadwell core support
  2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf, x86: Add Broadwell core support Andi Kleen
@ 2014-08-14  7:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
  2014-08-14  7:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2014-08-14  7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, eranian, Andi Kleen

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 206 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:17:47PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:

> v2: Remove unnamed model numbers.

> +	case 61: /* Broadwell Client */

Seriously? So 71 and 79 are fine as a number but you cannot name them?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds
  2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds Andi Kleen
  2014-08-14  4:46   ` Stephane Eranian
@ 2014-08-14  7:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2014-08-14  7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, eranian, Andi Kleen

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 524 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:17:48PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> v2: Use correct event name in description. Use EVENT() macro.

> +static unsigned bdw_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, unsigned left)
> +{
> +	if ((event->hw.config & 0xffff) ==

I was thinking you should use INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK or something instead
of the raw 0xFFFF there, but that X86_CONFIG() usage is nice too :-)

> +			X86_CONFIG(.event=0xc0, .umask=0x01)) {
> +		if (left < 128)
> +			left = 128;
> +		left &= ~0x3fu;
> +	}
> +	return left;
> +}

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf, x86: Add Broadwell core support
  2014-08-14  7:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2014-08-14  7:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
  2014-08-14 14:58       ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2014-08-14  7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, eranian, Andi Kleen

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 433 bytes --]

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:07:22AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:17:47PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> 
> > v2: Remove unnamed model numbers.
> 
> > +	case 61: /* Broadwell Client */
> 
> Seriously? So 71 and 79 are fine as a number but you cannot name them?

would something like:

	case 71: /* 14nm Broadwell TBA */

work? Where you then will update the description at the appropriate
time?

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds
  2014-08-14  4:46   ` Stephane Eranian
@ 2014-08-14 14:30     ` Andi Kleen
  2014-08-14 17:47       ` Stephane Eranian
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2014-08-14 14:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephane Eranian; +Cc: Andi Kleen, Peter Zijlstra, LKML, Ingo Molnar


I understand all your points, but there's no alternative.
The only other way would be to disable INST_RETIRED.ALL.

-Andi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf, x86: Add Broadwell core support
  2014-08-14  7:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2014-08-14 14:58       ` Andi Kleen
  2014-08-14 15:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2014-08-14 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: Andi Kleen, linux-kernel, mingo, eranian

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:32:10AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:07:22AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 06:17:47PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > 
> > > v2: Remove unnamed model numbers.
> > 
> > > +	case 61: /* Broadwell Client */
> > 
> > Seriously? So 71 and 79 are fine as a number but you cannot name them?
> 
> would something like:
> 
> 	case 71: /* 14nm Broadwell TBA */
> 
> work? Where you then will update the description at the appropriate
> time?

There won't be a single description, it will turn into all kinds 
of products. The names I used are the ones we use.

Really, Peter, it's futile to try to reproduce http://ark.intel.com
in perf comments. If you need information on specific Intel
products please look it up there.
 
-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Document all Haswell models
  2014-08-14  7:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2014-08-14 15:00     ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2014-08-14 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra; +Cc: Andi Kleen, linux-kernel, mingo, eranian

> Would something like this be accurate:?

I believe my version is more accurate, but feel free to use yours.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf, x86: Add Broadwell core support
  2014-08-14 14:58       ` Andi Kleen
@ 2014-08-14 15:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2014-08-14 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: Andi Kleen, linux-kernel, mingo, eranian

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 373 bytes --]

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 07:58:54AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:

> Really, Peter, it's futile to try to reproduce http://ark.intel.com
> in perf comments. If you need information on specific Intel
> products please look it up there.

ark.intel.com is useless, I never can find anything there.
The best I can find is wikipedia and they stopped listing model numbers
long ago :/

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds
  2014-08-14 14:30     ` Andi Kleen
@ 2014-08-14 17:47       ` Stephane Eranian
  2014-08-14 18:41         ` Andi Kleen
  2014-08-15 14:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Stephane Eranian @ 2014-08-14 17:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen, Namhyung Kim, Jiri Olsa, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  Cc: Andi Kleen, Peter Zijlstra, LKML, Ingo Molnar

[+perf tool maintainers]

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> I understand all your points, but there's no alternative.
> The only other way would be to disable INST_RETIRED.ALL.
>
You cannot do that either. INST_RETIRED:ALL is important.
I assume the bug applies whether or not the event is used
with a filter.

I think we need to ensure that by looking at the perf.data file,
one can reconstruct the total number of inst_Retired:all
occurrences for the run. With a fixed period, one would do
num_samples * fixed_period. I know the Gooda tool does
that. It is used to estimate the number of events captured
vs. the number of events occurring.

So what I am saying is that on BDW, we need to have
perf force PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD even with a fixed
period is passed. The kernel cannot simply add
PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD to the event sample_format
because the tool would get confused by the sample
record size otherwise.

I understand this is not pretty. We'd need to have
a on the evsel just before making the syscall. That
callback would be for x86 and it would check the
CPUID to force PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD. That's
my thinking but there may be a better way of doing
this.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds
  2014-08-14 17:47       ` Stephane Eranian
@ 2014-08-14 18:41         ` Andi Kleen
  2014-08-15 14:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2014-08-14 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephane Eranian
  Cc: Namhyung Kim, Jiri Olsa, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Andi Kleen,
	Peter Zijlstra, LKML, Ingo Molnar

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 07:47:56PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> [+perf tool maintainers]
> 
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > I understand all your points, but there's no alternative.
> > The only other way would be to disable INST_RETIRED.ALL.
> >
> You cannot do that either. INST_RETIRED:ALL is important.
> I assume the bug applies whether or not the event is used
> with a filter.

> 
> I think we need to ensure that by looking at the perf.data file,
> one can reconstruct the total number of inst_Retired:all
> occurrences for the run. With a fixed period, one would do
> num_samples * fixed_period. I know the Gooda tool does
> that. It is used to estimate the number of events captured
> vs. the number of events occurring.

Is that really a problem?

Normally periods are not that small, especially not for 
instruction retired. I don't think you can run such
a small period on instruction retired for
any significant time without throttling.

With sensible periods, let's say >10k, the error from
losing a few bits is very small. It would surprise
me if you can actually measure it.

There will be always much more jitter just from standard
system noise.

-Andi

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds
  2014-08-14 17:47       ` Stephane Eranian
  2014-08-14 18:41         ` Andi Kleen
@ 2014-08-15 14:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
  2014-08-15 17:21           ` Andi Kleen
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2014-08-15 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephane Eranian
  Cc: Andi Kleen, Namhyung Kim, Jiri Olsa, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo,
	Andi Kleen, LKML, Ingo Molnar

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1861 bytes --]

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 07:47:56PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> [+perf tool maintainers]
> 
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > I understand all your points, but there's no alternative.
> > The only other way would be to disable INST_RETIRED.ALL.
> >
> You cannot do that either. INST_RETIRED:ALL is important.  I assume
> the bug applies whether or not the event is used with a filter.
> 
> I think we need to ensure that by looking at the perf.data file, one
> can reconstruct the total number of inst_Retired:all occurrences for
> the run. With a fixed period, one would do num_samples * fixed_period.
> I know the Gooda tool does that. It is used to estimate the number of
> events captured vs. the number of events occurring.

OK, I think we can make that work; IFF we guarantee
perf_event_attr::sample_period >= 128.

Suppose we start out with sample_period=192; then we'll set period_left
to 192, we'll end up with left = 128 (we truncate the lower bits). We
get an interrupt, find that period_left = 64 (>0 so we return 0 and
don't get an overflow handler), up that to 128. Then we trigger again,
at n=256. Then we find period_left = -64 (<=0 so we return 1 and do get
an overflow). We increment with sample_period so we get left = 128. We
fire again, at n=384, period_left = 0 (<=0 so we return 1 and get an
overflow). And on and on.

So while the individual interrupts are 'wrong' we get then with
interval=256,128 in exactly the right ratio to average out at 192. And
this works for everything >=128.

So the num_samples*fixed_period thing is still entirely correct +- 127,
which is good enough I'd say, as you already have that error anyhow.

So no need to 'fix' the tools, al we need to do is refuse to create
INST_RETIRED:ALL events with sample_period < 128.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds
  2014-08-15 14:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
@ 2014-08-15 17:21           ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2014-08-15 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Zijlstra
  Cc: Stephane Eranian, Andi Kleen, Namhyung Kim, Jiri Olsa,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Andi Kleen, LKML, Ingo Molnar

> So no need to 'fix' the tools, al we need to do is refuse to create
> INST_RETIRED:ALL events with sample_period < 128.

Like this?

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index a0adf58..c592d4d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -443,6 +443,12 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (event->attr.type == PERF_TYPE_RAW)
 		event->hw.config |= event->attr.config & X86_RAW_EVENT_MASK;
 
+	if (event->attr.sample_period && x86_pmu.limit_period) {
+		if (x86_pmu.limit_period(event, event->attr.sample_period) <
+				event->attr.sample_period)
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	return x86_setup_perfctr(event);
 }

-Andi

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds
  2014-09-02 18:44 [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Remove incorrect model number from Haswell perf Andi Kleen
@ 2014-09-02 18:44 ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2014-09-02 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, eranian, tglx, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

On Broadwell INST_RETIRED.ALL cannot be used with any period
that doesn't have the lowest 6 bits cleared. And the period
should not be smaller than 128.

Add a new callback to enforce this, and set it for Broadwell.

This is erratum BDM57 and BDM11.

How does this handle the case when an app requests a specific
period with some of the bottom bits set

The apps thinks it is sampling at X occurences per sample, when it is
in fact at X - 63 (worst case).

Short answer:

Any useful instruction sampling period needs to be 4-6 orders
of magnitude larger than 128, as an PMI every 128 instructions
would instantly overwhelm the system and be throttled.
So the +-64 error from this is really small compared to the
period, much smaller than normal system jitter.

Long answer:

<write up by Peter:>

IFF we guarantee perf_event_attr::sample_period >= 128.

Suppose we start out with sample_period=192; then we'll set period_left
to 192, we'll end up with left = 128 (we truncate the lower bits). We
get an interrupt, find that period_left = 64 (>0 so we return 0 and
don't get an overflow handler), up that to 128. Then we trigger again,
at n=256. Then we find period_left = -64 (<=0 so we return 1 and do get
an overflow). We increment with sample_period so we get left = 128. We
fire again, at n=384, period_left = 0 (<=0 so we return 1 and get an
overflow). And on and on.

So while the individual interrupts are 'wrong' we get then with
interval=256,128 in exactly the right ratio to average out at 192. And
this works for everything >=128.

So the num_samples*fixed_period thing is still entirely correct +- 127,
which is good enough I'd say, as you already have that error anyhow.

So no need to 'fix' the tools, al we need to do is refuse to create
INST_RETIRED:ALL events with sample_period < 128.

v2: Use correct event name in description. Use EVENT() macro.
v3: Use INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK. Error out for events with too small period.
v4: Expand description.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c       |  9 +++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h       |  1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 0adc5e3..a6e4724 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -443,6 +443,12 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (event->attr.type == PERF_TYPE_RAW)
 		event->hw.config |= event->attr.config & X86_RAW_EVENT_MASK;
 
+	if (event->attr.sample_period && x86_pmu.limit_period) {
+		if (x86_pmu.limit_period(event, event->attr.sample_period) >
+				event->attr.sample_period)
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	return x86_setup_perfctr(event);
 }
 
@@ -980,6 +986,9 @@ int x86_perf_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (left > x86_pmu.max_period)
 		left = x86_pmu.max_period;
 
+	if (x86_pmu.limit_period)
+		left = x86_pmu.limit_period(event, left);
+
 	per_cpu(pmc_prev_left[idx], smp_processor_id()) = left;
 
 	/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
index de81627..a46e391 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -456,6 +456,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	struct x86_pmu_quirk *quirks;
 	int		perfctr_second_write;
 	bool		late_ack;
+	unsigned	(*limit_period)(struct perf_event *event, unsigned l);
 
 	/*
 	 * sysfs attrs
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 61b5404..6733a7f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -2034,6 +2034,24 @@ hsw_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
 	return c;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Broadwell:
+ * The INST_RETIRED.ALL period always needs to have lowest
+ * 6bits cleared (BDM57). It shall not use a period smaller
+ * than 100 (BDM11). We combine the two to enforce
+ * a min-period of 128.
+ */
+static unsigned bdw_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, unsigned left)
+{
+	if ((event->hw.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) ==
+			X86_CONFIG(.event=0xc0, .umask=0x01)) {
+		if (left < 128)
+			left = 128;
+		left &= ~0x3fu;
+	}
+	return left;
+}
+
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event,	"config:0-7"	);
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(umask,	"config:8-15"	);
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(edge,	"config:18"	);
@@ -2712,6 +2730,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		x86_pmu.hw_config = hsw_hw_config;
 		x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = hsw_get_event_constraints;
 		x86_pmu.cpu_events = hsw_events_attrs;
+		x86_pmu.limit_period = bdw_limit_period;
 		pr_cont("Broadwell events, ");
 		break;
 
-- 
1.9.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds
  2014-08-25 22:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds Andi Kleen
@ 2014-09-01 13:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2014-09-01 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andi Kleen; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, eranian, Andi Kleen

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 03:43:30PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> 
> On Broadwell INST_RETIRED.ALL cannot be used with any period
> that doesn't have the lowest 6 bits cleared. And the period
> should not be smaller than 128.
> 
> Add a new callback to enforce this, and set it for Broadwell.
> 
> This is erratum BDM57 and BDM11.

This changelog could do with more words on the solution, esp. such that
you answer Stephanes question.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds
  2014-08-27 21:03 perf, x86: Updated Broadwell patchkit Andi Kleen
@ 2014-08-27 21:03 ` Andi Kleen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2014-08-27 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, eranian, tglx, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

On Broadwell INST_RETIRED.ALL cannot be used with any period
that doesn't have the lowest 6 bits cleared. And the period
should not be smaller than 128.

Add a new callback to enforce this, and set it for Broadwell.

This is erratum BDM57 and BDM11.

v2: Use correct event name in description. Use EVENT() macro.
v3: Use INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK. Error out for events with too small period.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c       |  9 +++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h       |  1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 0adc5e3..a6e4724 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -443,6 +443,12 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (event->attr.type == PERF_TYPE_RAW)
 		event->hw.config |= event->attr.config & X86_RAW_EVENT_MASK;
 
+	if (event->attr.sample_period && x86_pmu.limit_period) {
+		if (x86_pmu.limit_period(event, event->attr.sample_period) >
+				event->attr.sample_period)
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	return x86_setup_perfctr(event);
 }
 
@@ -980,6 +986,9 @@ int x86_perf_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (left > x86_pmu.max_period)
 		left = x86_pmu.max_period;
 
+	if (x86_pmu.limit_period)
+		left = x86_pmu.limit_period(event, left);
+
 	per_cpu(pmc_prev_left[idx], smp_processor_id()) = left;
 
 	/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
index de81627..a46e391 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -456,6 +456,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	struct x86_pmu_quirk *quirks;
 	int		perfctr_second_write;
 	bool		late_ack;
+	unsigned	(*limit_period)(struct perf_event *event, unsigned l);
 
 	/*
 	 * sysfs attrs
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 7930b56..077205f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -2034,6 +2034,24 @@ hsw_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
 	return c;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Broadwell:
+ * The INST_RETIRED.ALL period always needs to have lowest
+ * 6bits cleared (BDM57). It shall not use a period smaller
+ * than 100 (BDM11). We combine the two to enforce
+ * a min-period of 128.
+ */
+static unsigned bdw_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, unsigned left)
+{
+	if ((event->hw.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) ==
+			X86_CONFIG(.event=0xc0, .umask=0x01)) {
+		if (left < 128)
+			left = 128;
+		left &= ~0x3fu;
+	}
+	return left;
+}
+
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event,	"config:0-7"	);
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(umask,	"config:8-15"	);
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(edge,	"config:18"	);
@@ -2712,6 +2730,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		x86_pmu.hw_config = hsw_hw_config;
 		x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = hsw_get_event_constraints;
 		x86_pmu.cpu_events = hsw_events_attrs;
+		x86_pmu.limit_period = bdw_limit_period;
 		pr_cont("Broadwell events, ");
 		break;
 
-- 
1.9.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds
  2014-08-25 22:43 Broadwell perf support Andi Kleen
@ 2014-08-25 22:43 ` Andi Kleen
  2014-09-01 13:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 23+ messages in thread
From: Andi Kleen @ 2014-08-25 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz; +Cc: linux-kernel, mingo, eranian, Andi Kleen

From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

On Broadwell INST_RETIRED.ALL cannot be used with any period
that doesn't have the lowest 6 bits cleared. And the period
should not be smaller than 128.

Add a new callback to enforce this, and set it for Broadwell.

This is erratum BDM57 and BDM11.

v2: Use correct event name in description. Use EVENT() macro.
v3: Use INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK. Error out for events with too small period.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c       |  9 +++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h       |  1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 0adc5e3..a6e4724 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -443,6 +443,12 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (event->attr.type == PERF_TYPE_RAW)
 		event->hw.config |= event->attr.config & X86_RAW_EVENT_MASK;
 
+	if (event->attr.sample_period && x86_pmu.limit_period) {
+		if (x86_pmu.limit_period(event, event->attr.sample_period) >
+				event->attr.sample_period)
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	return x86_setup_perfctr(event);
 }
 
@@ -980,6 +986,9 @@ int x86_perf_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event)
 	if (left > x86_pmu.max_period)
 		left = x86_pmu.max_period;
 
+	if (x86_pmu.limit_period)
+		left = x86_pmu.limit_period(event, left);
+
 	per_cpu(pmc_prev_left[idx], smp_processor_id()) = left;
 
 	/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
index de81627..a46e391 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.h
@@ -456,6 +456,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	struct x86_pmu_quirk *quirks;
 	int		perfctr_second_write;
 	bool		late_ack;
+	unsigned	(*limit_period)(struct perf_event *event, unsigned l);
 
 	/*
 	 * sysfs attrs
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 1cca4ae..53bd98d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -2034,6 +2034,24 @@ hsw_get_event_constraints(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc, struct perf_event *event)
 	return c;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Broadwell:
+ * The INST_RETIRED.ALL period always needs to have lowest
+ * 6bits cleared (BDM57). It shall not use a period smaller
+ * than 100 (BDM11). We combine the two to enforce
+ * a min-period of 128.
+ */
+static unsigned bdw_limit_period(struct perf_event *event, unsigned left)
+{
+	if ((event->hw.config & INTEL_ARCH_EVENT_MASK) ==
+			X86_CONFIG(.event=0xc0, .umask=0x01)) {
+		if (left < 128)
+			left = 128;
+		left &= ~0x3fu;
+	}
+	return left;
+}
+
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event,	"config:0-7"	);
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(umask,	"config:8-15"	);
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(edge,	"config:18"	);
@@ -2712,6 +2730,7 @@ __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		x86_pmu.hw_config = hsw_hw_config;
 		x86_pmu.get_event_constraints = hsw_get_event_constraints;
 		x86_pmu.cpu_events = hsw_events_attrs;
+		x86_pmu.limit_period = bdw_limit_period;
 		pr_cont("Broadwell events, ");
 		break;
 
-- 
1.9.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 23+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-02 18:44 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-08-14  1:17 Updated Broadwell perf patchkit Andi Kleen
2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Remove incorrect model number from Haswell perf Andi Kleen
2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf, x86: Document all Haswell models Andi Kleen
2014-08-14  7:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-14 15:00     ` Andi Kleen
2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf, x86: Add Broadwell core support Andi Kleen
2014-08-14  7:07   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-14  7:32     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-14 14:58       ` Andi Kleen
2014-08-14 15:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds Andi Kleen
2014-08-14  4:46   ` Stephane Eranian
2014-08-14 14:30     ` Andi Kleen
2014-08-14 17:47       ` Stephane Eranian
2014-08-14 18:41         ` Andi Kleen
2014-08-15 14:31         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-15 17:21           ` Andi Kleen
2014-08-14  7:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-14  1:17 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf, x86: Use Broadwell cache event list for Haswell Andi Kleen
2014-08-25 22:43 Broadwell perf support Andi Kleen
2014-08-25 22:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds Andi Kleen
2014-09-01 13:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-27 21:03 perf, x86: Updated Broadwell patchkit Andi Kleen
2014-08-27 21:03 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds Andi Kleen
2014-09-02 18:44 [PATCH 1/5] perf, x86: Remove incorrect model number from Haswell perf Andi Kleen
2014-09-02 18:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf, x86: Add INST_RETIRED.ALL workarounds Andi Kleen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).