From: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Aaron Jones <aaronmdjones@gmail.com>, "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Andrew G. Morgan" <morgan@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [capabilities] Allow normal inheritance for a configurable set of capabilities
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 18:09:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150202180952.GF24351@ubuntumail> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrVNgwyw37g+RGj1cZG2cVRPwucdDCC=WmiB6v+dUO7nyA@mail.gmail.com>
Quoting Andy Lutomirski (luto@amacapital.net):
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > A key concept behind posix capabilities is that the privilege comes from
> > both the person and the file being executed. As you say below basically
> > anything can be executed by the program so that is completely violated.
> >
> > Still, it's not that different from mmapping some arbitrary code and
> > jumping into it whlie retaining caps.
> >
> > If we were to support such a feature, I'm thinking I'd prefer we do
> > it somewhat analogously to the capability bounding set. Perhaps add a
> > ambient_inh_caps set or something. Empty by default. To add caps to it you
> > must have the cap in your permitted set already. (Ok to do in a user
> > namespace). Then at exec,
> >
> > pP' = (X & fP) | (pI & fI) | (pI & pA)
> >
> > pA being your ambient_inh set
> >
> > Not saying this is a good idea necessarily, but worth thinking about.
>
> This isn't obviously a bad formulation. We could control pA using some syscall.
My first thought was prctl (since we have PR_CAPBSET_DROP)
> Another formulation would be a single per-user-ns or
> inherited-per-process bit that sets fI to the full set regardless of
> file caps. Dealing with the file effective bit will be an added
> complication, as will dealing with setuid binaries.
>
> How many of you will be at LSF/MM? This might be a decent topic.
I'm not scheduled to be there.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-02 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-02 16:21 [capabilities] Allow normal inheritance for a configurable set of capabilities Christoph Lameter
2015-02-02 17:12 ` Serge Hallyn
2015-02-02 17:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-02 18:09 ` Serge Hallyn [this message]
2015-02-03 15:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-02-03 15:23 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-02-03 15:55 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-02-03 17:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-02-03 17:26 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-02-04 15:15 ` Andrew G. Morgan
2015-02-04 15:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-02-04 15:56 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-02-04 16:12 ` Andrew G. Morgan
2015-02-04 16:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-04 16:54 ` Andrew G. Morgan
2015-02-04 17:34 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-02-04 18:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-02-04 16:43 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-02-04 16:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-05 0:34 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-02-05 15:23 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-02-25 21:50 ` Pavel Machek
2015-02-25 23:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-02-26 12:27 ` Pavel Machek
2015-02-27 20:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-27 20:48 ` Pavel Machek
2015-02-27 20:56 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-27 22:47 ` Pavel Machek
2015-02-02 17:54 ` Casey Schaufler
2015-02-02 18:08 ` Serge Hallyn
2015-02-02 18:47 ` Mimi Zohar
2015-02-02 19:05 ` Austin S Hemmelgarn
2015-02-02 20:35 ` Casey Schaufler
2015-02-03 16:04 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-02-02 19:00 ` Casey Schaufler
2015-02-05 0:20 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-02-02 20:37 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-02 20:54 ` Casey Schaufler
2015-02-03 15:51 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-02-03 16:37 ` Casey Schaufler
2015-02-03 17:28 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-02-03 17:50 ` Casey Schaufler
2015-02-03 19:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-02-03 20:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-03 23:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-02-03 23:17 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-02-04 2:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-02-04 6:05 ` Markku Savela
2015-02-04 13:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-02-04 13:41 ` Markku Savela
2015-02-04 14:56 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2015-02-03 15:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-02-03 15:40 ` Casey Schaufler
2015-02-03 15:46 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-02-03 17:19 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-02-03 17:29 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2015-02-25 21:50 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150202180952.GF24351@ubuntumail \
--to=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
--cc=aaronmdjones@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=morgan@kernel.org \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).