From: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/1] cpufreq: exynos: allow modular build
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 14:22:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150202182213.GF17425@developer.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpondsvLm2S_V+aBSoCg252nHONJ6TbyTuHoVYuwxBDEuDA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 783 bytes --]
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:33:09AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 1 February 2015 at 00:29, Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
<big cut>
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Thanks!
>
> Now as these are all compilable as modules, should we look into the drivers as
> well to see what they are doing on module unload ?
hmm.. it seams to be the case, yes. From a quick look, there are unreleased resources
that needs to be freed. However, they are not really on module unload,
but on device removal. Which should be a reproducible but even today, in
case one manually unbinds the device.
Let me have a look here and will be sending something soon.
Thanks,
Eduardo Valentin
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-02 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-31 18:59 [PATCHv2 1/1] cpufreq: exynos: allow modular build Eduardo Valentin
2015-02-02 4:03 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-02-02 18:22 ` Eduardo Valentin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150202182213.GF17425@developer.hsd1.ca.comcast.net \
--to=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).