linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Robert Dolca <robert.dolca@gmail.com>,
	Robert Dolca <robert.dolca@intel.com>,
	"linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>,
	Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
	Denis CIOCCA <denis.ciocca@st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IIO: Adds ACPI support for ST gyroscopes
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 16:47:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150326144753.GO1878@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE1zotL0Si3=dGLGPmq0CGhc+tsJwDxY8GYwh8fcHA-1jcBdqA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 04:37:39PM +0200, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Mika Westerberg
> <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 02:04:35PM +0200, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Mika Westerberg
> >> <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:12:16PM +0200, Octavian Purdila wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Mika Westerberg
> >> >> <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> >> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 02:25:05PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> >> >> >> I think we can do the same for ACPI GpioInts so that we introduce
> >> >> >> acpi_gpio_irq_get() that translates from GpioInt to Linux IRQ
> >> >> >> numberspace. Then we can do something like below in I2C core:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>       if (client->irq <= 0) {
> >> >> >>               int irq = -ENOENT;
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>                 if (dev->of_node)
> >> >> >>                         irq = of_irq_get(dev->of_node, 0);
> >> >> >>                 else if (ACPI_COMPANION(dev))
> >> >> >>                         irq = acpi_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(dev), 0);
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>               if (irq == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> >> >> >>                         return irq;
> >> >> >>                 if (irq < 0)
> >> >> >>                         irq = 0;
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>                 client->irq = irq;
> >> >> >>       }
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Now it has the drawback that the first GpioInt will not be available to
> >> >> >> the driver anymore (as a GPIO since it is locked) but if DT already does
> >> >> >> the same we should be fine.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Below patch should take care of this.
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> One issue we noticed is that now the gpio request and set input
> >> >> directions operations are not called anymore. Some gpio controller
> >> >> drivers (dln2, adnp, lynx_point from quickly browsing the code) do not
> >> >> explicitly enable the GPIO pin nor set direction to input when the
> >> >> interrupt is enabled. Depending on hardware this may be an issue - it
> >> >> is on dln2 for example.
> >> >>
> >> >> Should the gpio controllers enable and set to input in irq_enable,
> >> >> irq_bus_sync_unlock, etc.? Or should this be done in gpiolib?
> >> >
> >> > Good question.
> >> >
> >> > In general I think that it is assumed that the boot firmware configures
> >> > the pin upfront. However, we have seen too many times that it actually
> >> > doesn't happen or it is configured wrong.
> >> >
> >> > Perhaps we could do this in GPIO core, for example in
> >> > gpiochip_irq_reqres/gpiochip_irq_map or so.
> >> >
> >>
> >> That sounds good to me. We tested your patch with the patch below and
> >> we can now directly use client->irq:
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> >> index 568aa2b..9865627 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> >> @@ -511,6 +511,19 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops gpiochip_domain_ops = {
> >>  static int gpiochip_irq_reqres(struct irq_data *d)
> >>  {
> >>         struct gpio_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> >> +       int ret;
> >> +
> >> +       ret = gpiod_request(&chip->desc[d->hwirq], "IRQ");
> >> +       if (ret) {
> >> +               chip_err(chip, "unable to request %lu for IRQ\n", d->hwirq);
> >> +               return ret;
> >> +       }
> >
> > What if the driver has already requested the GPIO?
> >
> 
> Initially I implemented the above to take that into account, e.g. if
> (test_and_set_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags) ...
> 
> But than I thought that we can't mess up with the GPIO anyway while
> the interrupt is in use.

That's right but then the above will fail also normal cases. For example
if the driver gets the irq like:

	desc = devm_gpiod_get(dev, ..);
	gpiod_direction_input(desc);
	irq = gpiod_to_irq(desc);

	ret = request_irq(irq, ...)

at this point we end up calling gpiochip_irq_reqres() which cannot
request the GPIO again and fails.

> One case I missed was if the user wants to read the GPIO while using
> it as an interrupt which seems to be possible...

While the GPIO is locked as IRQ it cannot be done as far as I can tell
but you can work it around by calling free_irq() first.

> 
> >> +
> >> +       ret = gpiod_direction_input(&chip->desc[d->hwirq]);
> >> +       if (ret) {
> >> +               chip_err(chip, "unable to set HW IRQ %lu as input\n", d->hwirq);
> >> +               return ret;
> >> +       }
> >>
> >>         if (gpiochip_lock_as_irq(chip, d->hwirq)) {
> >>                 chip_err(chip,

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-26 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-23 13:40 [PATCH] IIO: Adds ACPI support for ST gyroscopes Robert Dolca
2015-03-23 13:40 ` [PATCH] IIO: Add support for L3GD20H gyroscope Robert Dolca
2015-03-24 10:29   ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-28 11:14     ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-03-23 15:18 ` [PATCH] IIO: Adds ACPI support for ST gyroscopes Mika Westerberg
2015-03-24 11:51   ` Daniel Baluta
2015-03-24 10:22 ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-24 10:37 ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-24 10:44 ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-24 12:17 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-03-24 13:26   ` Robert Dolca
2015-03-24 13:38     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-03-24 13:57       ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-24 15:06         ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-24 15:22           ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-03-24 15:28             ` Daniel Baluta
2015-03-24 15:55             ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-24 16:43               ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-03-24 16:55                 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-25  8:44           ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-25  9:43             ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-25 12:25               ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-25 13:21                 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-25 13:42                   ` Robert Dolca
2015-03-25 18:05                   ` sathyanarayanan kuppuswamy
2015-03-25 18:08                     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-03-25 21:12                   ` Octavian Purdila
2015-03-26 10:06                     ` Robert Dolca
2015-03-26 10:36                       ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-26 10:16                     ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-26 12:04                       ` Octavian Purdila
2015-03-26 14:04                         ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-26 14:37                           ` Octavian Purdila
2015-03-26 14:47                             ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2015-03-26 15:00                               ` Octavian Purdila
2015-03-26 16:28                                 ` Octavian Purdila
2015-03-27 10:06                                   ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-27 10:36                                     ` Linus Walleij
2015-03-30  9:52                                       ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-30 12:55                                         ` Octavian Purdila
2015-03-30 13:33                                           ` Mika Westerberg
2015-03-30 13:52                                             ` Octavian Purdila
2015-03-30 14:18                                               ` Mika Westerberg
2015-04-07  9:35                                               ` Linus Walleij
2015-04-07  9:39                                                 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2015-03-26 18:32                                 ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150326144753.GO1878@lahna.fi.intel.com \
    --to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=denis.ciocca@st.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=octavian.purdila@intel.com \
    --cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
    --cc=robert.dolca@gmail.com \
    --cc=robert.dolca@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).