From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eeprom: at24: Add support for large EEPROMs connected to SMBus adapters
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 16:27:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150327152727.GA27238@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <551557B4.5000504@roeck-us.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2126 bytes --]
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 06:14:28AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 03/27/2015 06:01 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 05:51:11AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>On 03/27/2015 01:09 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>just to give you an update: I do have some code, but it is a bit messy,
> >>>>and it doesn't work well for ds2482 (the chip behind it still hangs up
> >>>>if I access it in parallel through i2c-dev). On top of that, it causes
> >>>>pretty significant slow-downs when accessing other devices on the same
> >>>>bus at the same time. Not surprising, I guess, since it expands the scope
> >>>>of the bus lock significantly.
> >>>
> >>>Just to get a better idea: Did you try taking the adapter_lock before
> >>>the two SMBus command which needed to be concatenated (and use
> >>>smbus_xfer directly)?
> >>>
> >>I did. I didn't use smbus_xfer directly, though, but introduced lockless
> >>versions of the various smbus commands, and kept using those.
> >
> >And then the chip still hangs? Or was that the performance penalty here?
> >
> Parallel access to a second eeprom chip on the same bus was much slower
> than before.
Interesting. I wonder what is the reason, I would have expected just a
small delay. Would you mind sending the patches for the non-locked smbus
routines? Would be nice to have that around in case I or someone else
find some time to try as well.
> Also, the new code did not solve the problem for ds2482 (completely unrelated
> to the at24 driver of course). Even with proper locking, the chip ended up
> hanging after some parallel accesses through i2c-dev. Granted, ds2482 is
> a difficult beast, but it is still annoying how access through i2c-dev
> can mess it up.
I assume you basically replaced the access_lock with the adapter_lock
with this one?
>
> The latter is what bothered me more: What is the point of all this if we
> still can not ensure correct operation ?
Yeah, this is not good at all.
How do you use i2c-dev BTW? i2c_rdwr_msgs? What about iterating over all
msgs in that and check for busy addresses?
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-27 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-04 16:23 [PATCH] eeprom: at24: Add support for large EEPROMs connected to SMBus adapters Guenter Roeck
2015-02-04 17:47 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-02-04 19:08 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-02-04 23:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-02-05 0:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-02-05 14:40 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-02-05 17:53 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-02-12 4:01 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-02-16 12:09 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-02-16 15:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-03-17 4:20 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-03-18 13:27 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-19 3:24 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-03-19 8:16 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-19 13:30 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-03-19 17:43 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-03-19 21:39 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-25 14:11 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-03-25 16:15 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-25 16:37 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-03-27 8:09 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-27 12:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-03-27 13:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2015-03-27 13:14 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-03-27 15:27 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2015-03-27 15:42 ` Guenter Roeck
2015-02-04 20:33 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150327152727.GA27238@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).