linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/1] udf: block-based fs should use generic_write_end()
@ 2015-03-20  3:37 Taesoo Kim
  2015-04-01  7:53 ` Jan Kara
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Taesoo Kim @ 2015-03-20  3:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack, linux-kernel; +Cc: taesoo, changwoo, sanidhya, blee, csong84, Taesoo Kim

simple_write_end() is for non-block fs, which doesn't invoke
mark_inode_dirty(). Instead, generic_write_end() correctly
handles such case when i_size has changed.

Signed-off-by: Taesoo Kim <tsgatesv@gmail.com>
---
 fs/udf/file.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/udf/file.c b/fs/udf/file.c
index 08f3555..28b1dab 100644
--- a/fs/udf/file.c
+++ b/fs/udf/file.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ const struct address_space_operations udf_adinicb_aops = {
 	.readpage	= udf_adinicb_readpage,
 	.writepage	= udf_adinicb_writepage,
 	.write_begin	= udf_adinicb_write_begin,
-	.write_end	= simple_write_end,
+	.write_end	= generic_write_end,
 	.direct_IO	= udf_adinicb_direct_IO,
 };
 
-- 
2.3.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/1] udf: block-based fs should use generic_write_end()
  2015-03-20  3:37 [PATCH 1/1] udf: block-based fs should use generic_write_end() Taesoo Kim
@ 2015-04-01  7:53 ` Jan Kara
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2015-04-01  7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Taesoo Kim; +Cc: jack, linux-kernel, taesoo, changwoo, sanidhya, blee, csong84

On Thu 19-03-15 23:37:59, Taesoo Kim wrote:
> simple_write_end() is for non-block fs, which doesn't invoke
> mark_inode_dirty(). Instead, generic_write_end() correctly
> handles such case when i_size has changed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Taesoo Kim <tsgatesv@gmail.com>
  So simple_write_end() is actually correct in that place. We cannot even
use generic_write_end() because that page doesn't have buffers attached -
it's a special case of a file which is smaller than a block and is packed
in the inode. Please test the patch better next time - this would oops on
you the first time you try to write to such a file. Thanks!

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/udf/file.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/udf/file.c b/fs/udf/file.c
> index 08f3555..28b1dab 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/file.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/file.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ const struct address_space_operations udf_adinicb_aops = {
>  	.readpage	= udf_adinicb_readpage,
>  	.writepage	= udf_adinicb_writepage,
>  	.write_begin	= udf_adinicb_write_begin,
> -	.write_end	= simple_write_end,
> +	.write_end	= generic_write_end,
>  	.direct_IO	= udf_adinicb_direct_IO,
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.3.3
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-01  7:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-20  3:37 [PATCH 1/1] udf: block-based fs should use generic_write_end() Taesoo Kim
2015-04-01  7:53 ` Jan Kara

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).