Please revert 08439fec266c3cc5702953b4f54bdf5649357de0

Please revert 08439fec266c3cc5702953b4f54bdf5649357de0

[Felipe Balbi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 685 bytes --]

Hi Theodore,

as you already know, commit 08439fec266c (ext4: remove
block_device_ejected) caused a regression for (at least) USB attached
storage devices.

You provided a fix for the regression by reverting that commit in
b9e43f49f672 (Revert "ext4: remove block_device_ejected"). This
revert is, currently, on linux-next but broken commit is part of
v4.1-final and, thus, part of v4.1 LTS.

Could you please mark your revert for v4.1+ stable ? If it's not too
late to get it in v4.2-final, that would be great, otherwise we a Cc
stable would suffice anyway.

In summary, commit 08439fec266c needs to be reverted on both v4.1-stable
and v4.2.

Thanks

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Please revert 08439fec266c3cc5702953b4f54bdf5649357de0

[Theodore Ts'o]

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi Theodore,
> 
> as you already know, commit 08439fec266c (ext4: remove
> block_device_ejected) caused a regression for (at least) USB attached
> storage devices.
> 
> You provided a fix for the regression by reverting that commit in
> b9e43f49f672 (Revert "ext4: remove block_device_ejected"). This
> revert is, currently, on linux-next but broken commit is part of
> v4.1-final and, thus, part of v4.1 LTS.
> 
> Could you please mark your revert for v4.1+ stable ? If it's not too
> late to get it in v4.2-final, that would be great, otherwise we a Cc
> stable would suffice anyway.
> 
> In summary, commit 08439fec266c needs to be reverted on both v4.1-stable
> and v4.2.

Already done.  See the latest version of the dev branch.  I noticed
this morning that I needed to mark it for stable, and took care of it.

     	     	    	      	      - Ted

Re: Please revert 08439fec266c3cc5702953b4f54bdf5649357de0

[Felipe Balbi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1037 bytes --]

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 08:54:37PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 02:45:03PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi Theodore,
> > 
> > as you already know, commit 08439fec266c (ext4: remove
> > block_device_ejected) caused a regression for (at least) USB attached
> > storage devices.
> > 
> > You provided a fix for the regression by reverting that commit in
> > b9e43f49f672 (Revert "ext4: remove block_device_ejected"). This
> > revert is, currently, on linux-next but broken commit is part of
> > v4.1-final and, thus, part of v4.1 LTS.
> > 
> > Could you please mark your revert for v4.1+ stable ? If it's not too
> > late to get it in v4.2-final, that would be great, otherwise we a Cc
> > stable would suffice anyway.
> > 
> > In summary, commit 08439fec266c needs to be reverted on both v4.1-stable
> > and v4.2.
> 
> Already done.  See the latest version of the dev branch.  I noticed
> this morning that I needed to mark it for stable, and took care of it.

cool, thanks

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]