* [REPOST PATCH] ftrace: Remove the unused variant ftrace_update_time
@ 2015-09-15 7:10 Minfei Huang
2015-09-15 13:35 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Minfei Huang @ 2015-09-15 7:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rostedt, mingo; +Cc: linux-kernel, mhuang, Minfei Huang
From: Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com>
Since the patch "ftrace: remove daemon(cb7be3b)" remove the function
ftraced, the variant ftrace_update_time never be used any more.
Remove the unused variant ftrace_update_time.
Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index b0623ac..d790f28 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -2766,7 +2766,6 @@ static void ftrace_shutdown_sysctl(void)
}
}
-static cycle_t ftrace_update_time;
unsigned long ftrace_update_tot_cnt;
static inline int ops_traces_mod(struct ftrace_ops *ops)
@@ -2826,7 +2825,6 @@ static int ftrace_update_code(struct module *mod, struct ftrace_page *new_pgs)
{
struct ftrace_page *pg;
struct dyn_ftrace *p;
- cycle_t start, stop;
unsigned long update_cnt = 0;
unsigned long ref = 0;
bool test = false;
@@ -2852,8 +2850,6 @@ static int ftrace_update_code(struct module *mod, struct ftrace_page *new_pgs)
}
}
- start = ftrace_now(raw_smp_processor_id());
-
for (pg = new_pgs; pg; pg = pg->next) {
for (i = 0; i < pg->index; i++) {
@@ -2894,8 +2890,6 @@ static int ftrace_update_code(struct module *mod, struct ftrace_page *new_pgs)
}
}
- stop = ftrace_now(raw_smp_processor_id());
- ftrace_update_time = stop - start;
ftrace_update_tot_cnt += update_cnt;
return 0;
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [REPOST PATCH] ftrace: Remove the unused variant ftrace_update_time
2015-09-15 7:10 [REPOST PATCH] ftrace: Remove the unused variant ftrace_update_time Minfei Huang
@ 2015-09-15 13:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-15 15:37 ` Minfei Huang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2015-09-15 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Minfei Huang; +Cc: mingo, linux-kernel, Minfei Huang
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:10:43 +0800
Minfei Huang <mhuang@redhat.com> wrote:
> From: Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com>
>
> Since the patch "ftrace: remove daemon(cb7be3b)" remove the function
> ftraced, the variant ftrace_update_time never be used any more.
>
> Remove the unused variant ftrace_update_time.
Actually, the patch I would like to see is this variable being used.
I'd like to know this statistic.
Maybe add it to the dyn_ftrace_total_info file?
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [REPOST PATCH] ftrace: Remove the unused variant ftrace_update_time
2015-09-15 13:35 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2015-09-15 15:37 ` Minfei Huang
2015-09-15 15:50 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Minfei Huang @ 2015-09-15 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: Minfei Huang, mingo, linux-kernel
On 09/15/15 at 09:35am, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:10:43 +0800
> Minfei Huang <mhuang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com>
> >
> > Since the patch "ftrace: remove daemon(cb7be3b)" remove the function
> > ftraced, the variant ftrace_update_time never be used any more.
> >
> > Remove the unused variant ftrace_update_time.
>
> Actually, the patch I would like to see is this variable being used.
> I'd like to know this statistic.
Hi, Steven.
I think the variant ftrace_update_time is not used any more. Previously,
it is used to print the time how long ftrace will spend to update the
code in fucntion ftraced.
>
> Maybe add it to the dyn_ftrace_total_info file?
>
This file only uses the variant ftrace_update_tot_cnt which is stored
the updated function number.
Thanks
Minfei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [REPOST PATCH] ftrace: Remove the unused variant ftrace_update_time
2015-09-15 15:37 ` Minfei Huang
@ 2015-09-15 15:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-15 16:00 ` Minfei Huang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2015-09-15 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Minfei Huang; +Cc: Minfei Huang, mingo, linux-kernel
On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 23:37:39 +0800
Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the variant ftrace_update_time is not used any more. Previously,
> it is used to print the time how long ftrace will spend to update the
> code in fucntion ftraced.
Yes, I know what it measures. It's been on my todo list to export that
out to userspace, as it is an interesting metric.
>
> >
> > Maybe add it to the dyn_ftrace_total_info file?
> >
>
> This file only uses the variant ftrace_update_tot_cnt which is stored
> the updated function number.
But we can add to that file with a space delimited output.
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [REPOST PATCH] ftrace: Remove the unused variant ftrace_update_time
2015-09-15 15:50 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2015-09-15 16:00 ` Minfei Huang
2015-09-15 16:12 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Minfei Huang @ 2015-09-15 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: Minfei Huang, mingo, linux-kernel
On 09/15/15 at 11:50am, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 23:37:39 +0800
> Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> > I think the variant ftrace_update_time is not used any more. Previously,
> > it is used to print the time how long ftrace will spend to update the
> > code in fucntion ftraced.
>
> Yes, I know what it measures. It's been on my todo list to export that
> out to userspace, as it is an interesting metric.
>
Export the time which ftrace spent to update the all of the function?
How about exporting the time ftrace spent in latest time?
Thanks
Minfei
> >
> > >
> > > Maybe add it to the dyn_ftrace_total_info file?
> > >
> >
> > This file only uses the variant ftrace_update_tot_cnt which is stored
> > the updated function number.
>
> But we can add to that file with a space delimited output.
>
> -- Steve
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [REPOST PATCH] ftrace: Remove the unused variant ftrace_update_time
2015-09-15 16:00 ` Minfei Huang
@ 2015-09-15 16:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-15 16:32 ` Minfei Huang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2015-09-15 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Minfei Huang; +Cc: Minfei Huang, mingo, linux-kernel
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:46 +0800
Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 09/15/15 at 11:50am, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 23:37:39 +0800
> > Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I think the variant ftrace_update_time is not used any more. Previously,
> > > it is used to print the time how long ftrace will spend to update the
> > > code in fucntion ftraced.
> >
> > Yes, I know what it measures. It's been on my todo list to export that
> > out to userspace, as it is an interesting metric.
> >
>
> Export the time which ftrace spent to update the all of the function?
> How about exporting the time ftrace spent in latest time?
>
I think you misunderstood me. I want to export what it is now. The time
it took to run ftrace_update_code() the last time it ran. Not a total
amount of time that it ran for.
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [REPOST PATCH] ftrace: Remove the unused variant ftrace_update_time
2015-09-15 16:12 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2015-09-15 16:32 ` Minfei Huang
2015-09-15 17:01 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Minfei Huang @ 2015-09-15 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: Minfei Huang, mingo, linux-kernel
On 09/15/15 at 12:12pm, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:46 +0800
> Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 09/15/15 at 11:50am, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 23:37:39 +0800
> > > Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > I think the variant ftrace_update_time is not used any more. Previously,
> > > > it is used to print the time how long ftrace will spend to update the
> > > > code in fucntion ftraced.
> > >
> > > Yes, I know what it measures. It's been on my todo list to export that
> > > out to userspace, as it is an interesting metric.
> > >
> >
> > Export the time which ftrace spent to update the all of the function?
> > How about exporting the time ftrace spent in latest time?
> >
>
> I think you misunderstood me. I want to export what it is now. The time
> it took to run ftrace_update_code() the last time it ran. Not a total
> amount of time that it ran for.
>
Got it.
There is one more confusion. Is it valuable to export such info to
userspace? What does user do, if kernel exports this?
Thanks
Minfei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [REPOST PATCH] ftrace: Remove the unused variant ftrace_update_time
2015-09-15 16:32 ` Minfei Huang
@ 2015-09-15 17:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-16 2:16 ` Minfei Huang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2015-09-15 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Minfei Huang; +Cc: Minfei Huang, mingo, linux-kernel
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:32:02 +0800
Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is one more confusion. Is it valuable to export such info to
> userspace? What does user do, if kernel exports this?
Nothing. The dyn_ftrace_total_info is purely for debugging ftrace. It's
something I use.
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [REPOST PATCH] ftrace: Remove the unused variant ftrace_update_time
2015-09-15 17:01 ` Steven Rostedt
@ 2015-09-16 2:16 ` Minfei Huang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Minfei Huang @ 2015-09-16 2:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt; +Cc: Minfei Huang, mingo, linux-kernel
On 09/15/15 at 01:01pm, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:32:02 +0800
> Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There is one more confusion. Is it valuable to export such info to
> > userspace? What does user do, if kernel exports this?
>
> Nothing. The dyn_ftrace_total_info is purely for debugging ftrace. It's
> something I use.
>
hmmm...
Thanks. I don't insist for this patch, if you want to export this
variant to userspace.
Thanks
Minfei
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-16 2:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-15 7:10 [REPOST PATCH] ftrace: Remove the unused variant ftrace_update_time Minfei Huang
2015-09-15 13:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-15 15:37 ` Minfei Huang
2015-09-15 15:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-15 16:00 ` Minfei Huang
2015-09-15 16:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-15 16:32 ` Minfei Huang
2015-09-15 17:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-16 2:16 ` Minfei Huang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).