From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>, He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>,
Kaixu Xia <xiakaixu@huawei.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next] bpf: fix bpf_perf_event_read() helper
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 10:21:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151025092142.GB4380@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <562A474E.6040401@plumgrid.com>
* Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com> wrote:
> On 10/23/15 5:03 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >So the bpf_perf_event_read() returns the count value, does this not also
> >mean that returning -EINVAL here is also 'wrong'?
> >
> >I mean, sure an actual count value that high is unlikely, but its still
> >a broken interface.
>
> Agree. that's not pretty interface. I wish I looked at it more carefully
> when it was introduced. Now it's too late to change.
So I really, really think eBPF needs to have an easy to use mechanism to phase out
old ABI components and introducing new (better) ones!
Then old crap can be de-emphasised and eventually removed, instead of having to
live with crap forever ...
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-25 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-23 0:10 [PATCH v3 net-next] bpf: fix bpf_perf_event_read() helper Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-23 2:21 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-23 2:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-23 3:47 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-23 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-23 14:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-23 14:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-25 9:21 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-10-25 16:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-26 12:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-26 12:54 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-10-26 21:28 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-10-27 4:50 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151025092142.GB4380@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=xiakaixu@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).