* [PATCH] brd: Refuse improperly aligned discard requests
@ 2015-11-04 16:13 Jan Kara
2015-11-05 4:18 ` Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)
2015-11-05 20:11 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2015-11-04 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: axboe; +Cc: LKML, linux-fsdevel, Christoph Hellwig, Jan Kara
Currently when improperly aligned discard request is submitted, we just
silently discard more / less data which results in filesystem corruption
in some cases. Refuse such misaligned requests.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
---
drivers/block/brd.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/block/brd.c b/drivers/block/brd.c
index b9794aeeb878..4ef4cdf67ede 100644
--- a/drivers/block/brd.c
+++ b/drivers/block/brd.c
@@ -337,6 +337,9 @@ static void brd_make_request(struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio)
goto io_error;
if (unlikely(bio->bi_rw & REQ_DISCARD)) {
+ if (sector & ((PAGE_SIZE >> SECTOR_SHIFT) - 1) ||
+ bio->bi_iter.bi_size & PAGE_MASK)
+ goto io_error;
discard_from_brd(brd, sector, bio->bi_iter.bi_size);
goto out;
}
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] brd: Refuse improperly aligned discard requests
2015-11-04 16:13 [PATCH] brd: Refuse improperly aligned discard requests Jan Kara
@ 2015-11-05 4:18 ` Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)
2015-11-05 8:06 ` Jan Kara
2015-11-05 20:11 ` Jens Axboe
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory) @ 2015-11-05 4:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kara, axboe; +Cc: LKML, linux-fsdevel, Christoph Hellwig
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Jan Kara
> Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 10:14 AM
> To: axboe@kernel.dk
> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>; Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] brd: Refuse improperly aligned discard requests
>
> Currently when improperly aligned discard request is submitted, we just
> silently discard more / less data which results in filesystem corruption
> in some cases. Refuse such misaligned requests.
I agree discarding more than requested is very bad.
If they are routed to SCSI or ATA devices, though, the discard commands
(SCSI UNMAP or ATA DATA SET MANAGEMENT/TRIM) are just hints, so there
is no guarantee the discard will do anything. Are you finding
filesystems that still don't understand that? dm-raid held that
mistaken assumption for a long time.
---
Robert Elliott, HP Server Storage
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] brd: Refuse improperly aligned discard requests
2015-11-05 4:18 ` Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)
@ 2015-11-05 8:06 ` Jan Kara
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2015-11-05 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)
Cc: Jan Kara, axboe, LKML, linux-fsdevel, Christoph Hellwig
On Thu 05-11-15 04:18:49, Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory) wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-
> > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Jan Kara
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 10:14 AM
> > To: axboe@kernel.dk
> > Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> > Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>; Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] brd: Refuse improperly aligned discard requests
> >
> > Currently when improperly aligned discard request is submitted, we just
> > silently discard more / less data which results in filesystem corruption
> > in some cases. Refuse such misaligned requests.
>
> I agree discarding more than requested is very bad.
>
> If they are routed to SCSI or ATA devices, though, the discard commands
> (SCSI UNMAP or ATA DATA SET MANAGEMENT/TRIM) are just hints, so there
> is no guarantee the discard will do anything. Are you finding
> filesystems that still don't understand that? dm-raid held that
> mistaken assumption for a long time.
So there is blkdev_issue_zeroout() which uses blkdev_issue_discard() if
'discard_zeroes_data' is set. I'd hope that in that case zeroing really
happens as submitted or error is returned... Filesystems definitely depend
on blkdev_issue_zeroout() doing what it is told.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] brd: Refuse improperly aligned discard requests
2015-11-04 16:13 [PATCH] brd: Refuse improperly aligned discard requests Jan Kara
2015-11-05 4:18 ` Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)
@ 2015-11-05 20:11 ` Jens Axboe
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2015-11-05 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Kara; +Cc: LKML, linux-fsdevel, Christoph Hellwig
On 11/04/2015 09:13 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> Currently when improperly aligned discard request is submitted, we just
> silently discard more / less data which results in filesystem corruption
> in some cases. Refuse such misaligned requests.
Applied, thanks Jan.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-11-05 20:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-11-04 16:13 [PATCH] brd: Refuse improperly aligned discard requests Jan Kara
2015-11-05 4:18 ` Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)
2015-11-05 8:06 ` Jan Kara
2015-11-05 20:11 ` Jens Axboe
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).