From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tgraf@suug.ch,
fengguang.wu@intel.com, wfg@linux.intel.com, lkp@01.org
Subject: Re: rhashtable: Prevent spurious EBUSY errors on insertion
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 16:38:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151203153805.GC17467@orbit.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151203124129.GA5505@gondor.apana.org.au>
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 08:41:29PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 06:18:59PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >
> > OK that's better. I think I see the problem. The test in
> > rhashtable_insert_rehash is racy and if two threads both try
> > to grow the table one of them may be tricked into doing a rehash
> > instead.
> >
> > I'm working on a fix.
>
> OK this patch fixes the EBUSY problem as far as I can tell. Please
> let me know if you still observe EBUSY with it. I'll respond to the
> ENOMEM problem in another email.
>
> ---8<---
> Thomas and Phil observed that under stress rhashtable insertion
> sometimes failed with EBUSY, even though this error should only
> ever been seen when we're under attack and our hash chain length
> has grown to an unacceptable level, even after a rehash.
>
> It turns out that the logic for detecting whether there is an
> existing rehash is faulty. In particular, when two threads both
> try to grow the same table at the same time, one of them may see
> the newly grown table and thus erroneously conclude that it had
> been rehashed. This is what leads to the EBUSY error.
>
> This patch fixes this by remembering the current last table we
> used during insertion so that rhashtable_insert_rehash can detect
> when another thread has also done a resize/rehash. When this is
> detected we will give up our resize/rehash and simply retry the
> insertion with the new table.
>
> Reported-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
> Reported-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Tested-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-03 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-20 17:17 [PATCH v2 0/4] improve fault-tolerance of rhashtable runtime-test Phil Sutter
2015-11-20 17:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] rhashtable-test: add cond_resched() to thread test Phil Sutter
2015-11-20 17:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] rhashtable-test: retry insert operations Phil Sutter
2015-11-20 17:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] rhashtable-test: calculate max_entries value by default Phil Sutter
2015-11-20 17:17 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] rhashtable-test: allow to retry even if -ENOMEM was returned Phil Sutter
2015-11-20 17:28 ` Phil Sutter
2015-11-23 17:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] improve fault-tolerance of rhashtable runtime-test David Miller
2015-11-30 9:37 ` Herbert Xu
2015-11-30 10:14 ` Phil Sutter
2015-11-30 10:18 ` Herbert Xu
2015-12-03 12:41 ` rhashtable: Prevent spurious EBUSY errors on insertion Herbert Xu
2015-12-03 15:38 ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2015-12-04 19:38 ` David Miller
2015-12-17 8:46 ` Xin Long
2015-12-17 8:48 ` Herbert Xu
2015-12-17 9:00 ` Xin Long
2015-12-17 16:07 ` Xin Long
2015-12-18 2:26 ` Herbert Xu
2015-12-18 8:18 ` Xin Long
2015-12-17 17:00 ` David Miller
2015-12-03 12:51 ` rhashtable: ENOMEM errors when hit with a flood of insertions Herbert Xu
2015-12-03 15:08 ` David Laight
2015-12-03 16:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-12-04 0:07 ` Herbert Xu
2015-12-04 14:39 ` rhashtable: Use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC for table allocation Herbert Xu
2015-12-04 17:01 ` Phil Sutter
2015-12-04 17:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-12-04 18:15 ` Phil Sutter
2015-12-05 7:06 ` Herbert Xu
2015-12-07 15:35 ` Thomas Graf
2015-12-07 19:29 ` David Miller
2015-12-09 2:18 ` Thomas Graf
2015-12-09 2:24 ` Herbert Xu
2015-12-09 2:36 ` Thomas Graf
2015-12-09 2:38 ` Herbert Xu
2015-12-09 2:42 ` Thomas Graf
2015-12-04 21:53 ` David Miller
2015-12-05 7:03 ` Herbert Xu
2015-12-06 3:48 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151203153805.GC17467@orbit.nwl.cc \
--to=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=wfg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).