* [PATCH] tpm_crb: Use the common ACPI definition of struct acpi_tpm2
@ 2015-12-02 19:19 Jason Gunthorpe
2015-12-03 8:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2015-12-02 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jarkko Sakkinen; +Cc: tpmdd-devel, linux-kernel
include/acpi/actbl2.h is the proper place for these definitions
and the needed TPM2 ones have been there since
commit 413d4a6defe0 ("ACPICA: Update TPM2 ACPI table")
This also drops the le32_to_cpu for members of this table,
consistent with other ACPI stuff.
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 7 -------
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
index 542a80cbfd9c..28b477e8da6a 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
@@ -128,13 +128,6 @@ enum tpm2_startup_types {
TPM2_SU_STATE = 0x0001,
};
-enum tpm2_start_method {
- TPM2_START_ACPI = 2,
- TPM2_START_FIFO = 6,
- TPM2_START_CRB = 7,
- TPM2_START_CRB_WITH_ACPI = 8,
-};
-
struct tpm_chip;
struct tpm_vendor_specific {
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
index 8342cf51ffdc..5b74ad8ca7fd 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
@@ -34,14 +34,6 @@ enum crb_defaults {
CRB_ACPI_START_INDEX = 1,
};
-struct acpi_tpm2 {
- struct acpi_table_header hdr;
- u16 platform_class;
- u16 reserved;
- u64 control_area_pa;
- u32 start_method;
-} __packed;
-
enum crb_ca_request {
CRB_CA_REQ_GO_IDLE = BIT(0),
CRB_CA_REQ_CMD_READY = BIT(1),
@@ -207,7 +199,7 @@ static const struct tpm_class_ops tpm_crb = {
static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
{
struct tpm_chip *chip;
- struct acpi_tpm2 *buf;
+ struct acpi_table_tpm2 *buf;
struct crb_priv *priv;
struct device *dev = &device->dev;
acpi_status status;
@@ -223,7 +215,8 @@ static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
}
/* Should the FIFO driver handle this? */
- if (buf->start_method == TPM2_START_FIFO)
+ sm = buf->start_method;
+ if (sm == ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED)
return -ENODEV;
chip = tpmm_chip_alloc(dev, &tpm_crb);
@@ -232,7 +225,7 @@ static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
chip->flags = TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
- if (buf->hdr.length < sizeof(struct acpi_tpm2)) {
+ if (buf->header.length < sizeof(*buf)) {
dev_err(dev, "TPM2 ACPI table has wrong size");
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -244,21 +237,20 @@ static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
return -ENOMEM;
}
- sm = le32_to_cpu(buf->start_method);
-
/* The reason for the extra quirk is that the PTT in 4th Gen Core CPUs
* report only ACPI start but in practice seems to require both
* ACPI start and CRB start.
*/
- if (sm == TPM2_START_CRB || sm == TPM2_START_FIFO ||
+ if (sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER || sm == ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED ||
!strcmp(acpi_device_hid(device), "MSFT0101"))
priv->flags |= CRB_FL_CRB_START;
- if (sm == TPM2_START_ACPI || sm == TPM2_START_CRB_WITH_ACPI)
+ if (sm == ACPI_TPM2_START_METHOD ||
+ sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_START_METHOD)
priv->flags |= CRB_FL_ACPI_START;
priv->cca = (struct crb_control_area __iomem *)
- devm_ioremap_nocache(dev, buf->control_area_pa, 0x1000);
+ devm_ioremap_nocache(dev, buf->control_address, 0x1000);
if (!priv->cca) {
dev_err(dev, "ioremap of the control area failed\n");
return -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
index 8a3509cb10da..304323bdcaaa 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static inline int is_fifo(struct acpi_device *dev)
return 0;
}
- if (le32_to_cpu(tbl->start_method) != TPM2_START_FIFO)
+ if (tbl->start_method != ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED)
return 0;
/* TPM 2.0 FIFO */
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tpm_crb: Use the common ACPI definition of struct acpi_tpm2
2015-12-02 19:19 [PATCH] tpm_crb: Use the common ACPI definition of struct acpi_tpm2 Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2015-12-03 8:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2015-12-03 17:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2015-12-03 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Gunthorpe; +Cc: tpmdd-devel, linux-kernel
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:19:00PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> include/acpi/actbl2.h is the proper place for these definitions
> and the needed TPM2 ones have been there since
> commit 413d4a6defe0 ("ACPICA: Update TPM2 ACPI table")
>
> This also drops the le32_to_cpu for members of this table,
> consistent with other ACPI stuff.
Why le32_to_cpu() is not needed?
/Jarkko
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h | 7 -------
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> index 542a80cbfd9c..28b477e8da6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> @@ -128,13 +128,6 @@ enum tpm2_startup_types {
> TPM2_SU_STATE = 0x0001,
> };
>
> -enum tpm2_start_method {
> - TPM2_START_ACPI = 2,
> - TPM2_START_FIFO = 6,
> - TPM2_START_CRB = 7,
> - TPM2_START_CRB_WITH_ACPI = 8,
> -};
> -
> struct tpm_chip;
>
> struct tpm_vendor_specific {
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> index 8342cf51ffdc..5b74ad8ca7fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_crb.c
> @@ -34,14 +34,6 @@ enum crb_defaults {
> CRB_ACPI_START_INDEX = 1,
> };
>
> -struct acpi_tpm2 {
> - struct acpi_table_header hdr;
> - u16 platform_class;
> - u16 reserved;
> - u64 control_area_pa;
> - u32 start_method;
> -} __packed;
> -
> enum crb_ca_request {
> CRB_CA_REQ_GO_IDLE = BIT(0),
> CRB_CA_REQ_CMD_READY = BIT(1),
> @@ -207,7 +199,7 @@ static const struct tpm_class_ops tpm_crb = {
> static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> {
> struct tpm_chip *chip;
> - struct acpi_tpm2 *buf;
> + struct acpi_table_tpm2 *buf;
> struct crb_priv *priv;
> struct device *dev = &device->dev;
> acpi_status status;
> @@ -223,7 +215,8 @@ static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> }
>
> /* Should the FIFO driver handle this? */
> - if (buf->start_method == TPM2_START_FIFO)
> + sm = buf->start_method;
> + if (sm == ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> chip = tpmm_chip_alloc(dev, &tpm_crb);
> @@ -232,7 +225,7 @@ static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
>
> chip->flags = TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2;
>
> - if (buf->hdr.length < sizeof(struct acpi_tpm2)) {
> + if (buf->header.length < sizeof(*buf)) {
> dev_err(dev, "TPM2 ACPI table has wrong size");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> @@ -244,21 +237,20 @@ static int crb_acpi_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - sm = le32_to_cpu(buf->start_method);
> -
> /* The reason for the extra quirk is that the PTT in 4th Gen Core CPUs
> * report only ACPI start but in practice seems to require both
> * ACPI start and CRB start.
> */
> - if (sm == TPM2_START_CRB || sm == TPM2_START_FIFO ||
> + if (sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER || sm == ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED ||
> !strcmp(acpi_device_hid(device), "MSFT0101"))
> priv->flags |= CRB_FL_CRB_START;
>
> - if (sm == TPM2_START_ACPI || sm == TPM2_START_CRB_WITH_ACPI)
> + if (sm == ACPI_TPM2_START_METHOD ||
> + sm == ACPI_TPM2_COMMAND_BUFFER_WITH_START_METHOD)
> priv->flags |= CRB_FL_ACPI_START;
>
> priv->cca = (struct crb_control_area __iomem *)
> - devm_ioremap_nocache(dev, buf->control_area_pa, 0x1000);
> + devm_ioremap_nocache(dev, buf->control_address, 0x1000);
> if (!priv->cca) {
> dev_err(dev, "ioremap of the control area failed\n");
> return -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> index 8a3509cb10da..304323bdcaaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static inline int is_fifo(struct acpi_device *dev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> - if (le32_to_cpu(tbl->start_method) != TPM2_START_FIFO)
> + if (tbl->start_method != ACPI_TPM2_MEMORY_MAPPED)
> return 0;
>
> /* TPM 2.0 FIFO */
> --
> 2.1.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tpm_crb: Use the common ACPI definition of struct acpi_tpm2
2015-12-03 8:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
@ 2015-12-03 17:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2015-12-06 1:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2015-12-03 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jarkko Sakkinen; +Cc: tpmdd-devel, linux-kernel
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 10:27:53AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:19:00PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > include/acpi/actbl2.h is the proper place for these definitions
> > and the needed TPM2 ones have been there since
> > commit 413d4a6defe0 ("ACPICA: Update TPM2 ACPI table")
> >
> > This also drops the le32_to_cpu for members of this table,
> > consistent with other ACPI stuff.
>
> Why le32_to_cpu() is not needed?
Why is it needed?
None of the fields are marked le32 in the struct and no other ACPI
thing I could find swaps.
If swapping is needed then the struct fields must be declared as 'le'
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tpm_crb: Use the common ACPI definition of struct acpi_tpm2
2015-12-03 17:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
@ 2015-12-06 1:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Sakkinen @ 2015-12-06 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Gunthorpe; +Cc: tpmdd-devel, linux-kernel
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 10:02:17AM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 10:27:53AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 12:19:00PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > include/acpi/actbl2.h is the proper place for these definitions
> > > and the needed TPM2 ones have been there since
> > > commit 413d4a6defe0 ("ACPICA: Update TPM2 ACPI table")
> > >
> > > This also drops the le32_to_cpu for members of this table,
> > > consistent with other ACPI stuff.
> >
> > Why le32_to_cpu() is not needed?
>
> Why is it needed?
>
> None of the fields are marked le32 in the struct and no other ACPI
> thing I could find swaps.
>
> If swapping is needed then the struct fields must be declared as 'le'
I'm just puzzling with three things:
1. Does it do conversion to the CPU format internally if you use the
tables in a big-endian environment?
2. Isn't that code import from ACPICA? That would explains why it does
not have tagged fields.
3. Could the reason be for such conversions not widely applied in the
kernel that ACPI has been previously mostly used only in the PC/x86
ecosystem?
AFAIK ACPI exist also for ARM64 servers, which can be a big-endian
environment.
> Jason
/Jarkko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-06 1:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-02 19:19 [PATCH] tpm_crb: Use the common ACPI definition of struct acpi_tpm2 Jason Gunthorpe
2015-12-03 8:27 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2015-12-03 17:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2015-12-06 1:25 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).