From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: MaJun <majun258@huawei.com>
Cc: Catalin.Marinas@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Will.Deacon@arm.com,
marc.zyngier@arm.com, jason@lakedaemon.net, tglx@linutronix.de,
lizefan@huawei.com, huxinwei@huawei.com, dingtianhong@huawei.com,
zhaojunhua@hisilicon.com, liguozhu@hisilicon.com,
xuwei5@hisilicon.com, wei.chenwei@hisilicon.com,
guohanjun@huawei.com, wuyun.wu@huawei.com, guodong.xu@linaro.org,
haojian.zhuang@linaro.org, zhangfei.gao@linaro.org,
usman.ahmad@linaro.org, klimov.linux@gmail.com,
gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/4] irqchip:create irq domain for each mbigen device
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:42:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151211154236.GF20666@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448248513-39760-4-git-send-email-majun258@huawei.com>
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 11:15:12AM +0800, MaJun wrote:
> From: Ma Jun <majun258@huawei.com>
>
> For peripheral devices which connect to mbigen,mbigen is a interrupt
> controller. So, we create irq domain for each mbigen device and add
> mbigen irq domain into irq hierarchy structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ma Jun <majun258@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c
> index 9f036c2..81ae61f 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mbigen.c
> @@ -16,13 +16,36 @@
> * along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> */
>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/msi.h>
> #include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> +/* Interrupt numbers per mbigen node supported */
> +#define IRQS_PER_MBIGEN_NODE 128
> +
> +/* 64 irqs (Pin0-pin63) are reserved for each mbigen chip */
> +#define RESERVED_IRQ_PER_MBIGEN_CHIP 64
> +
> +/**
> + * In mbigen vector register
> + * bit[21:12]: event id value
> + * bit[11:0]: device id
> + */
> +#define IRQ_EVENT_ID_SHIFT 12
> +#define IRQ_EVENT_ID_MASK 0x3ff
> +
> +/* register range of each mbigen node */
> +#define MBIGEN_NODE_OFFSET 0x1000
> +
> +/* offset of vector register in mbigen node */
> +#define REG_MBIGEN_VEC_OFFSET 0x200
> +
> /**
> * struct mbigen_device - holds the information of mbigen device.
> *
> @@ -34,10 +57,94 @@ struct mbigen_device {
> void __iomem *base;
> };
>
> +static inline unsigned int get_mbigen_vec_reg(irq_hw_number_t hwirq)
> +{
> + unsigned int nid, pin;
> +
> + hwirq -= RESERVED_IRQ_PER_MBIGEN_CHIP;
> + nid = hwirq / IRQS_PER_MBIGEN_NODE + 1;
> + pin = hwirq % IRQS_PER_MBIGEN_NODE;
> +
> + return pin * 4 + nid * MBIGEN_NODE_OFFSET
> + + REG_MBIGEN_VEC_OFFSET;
> +}
Ok. So your "global" pin id is "global" per mbigen chip.
I think it may make more sense to have separate nid and pin fields in
your interrupt-specifier, e.g. interrupt = <1 3 x> for nid 1, pin 3.
That's easier for someone to check against a datasheet that describes
the nid and pin rather than the global number space you've come up with,
and also makes it impossible to describe the reserved IRQs.
> +
> +static struct irq_chip mbigen_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "mbigen-v2",
> +};
> +
> +static void mbigen_write_msg(struct msi_desc *desc, struct msi_msg *msg)
> +{
> + struct irq_data *d = irq_get_irq_data(desc->irq);
> + void __iomem *base = d->chip_data;
> + u32 val;
> +
> + base += get_mbigen_vec_reg(d->hwirq);
> + val = readl_relaxed(base);
> +
> + val &= ~(IRQ_EVENT_ID_MASK << IRQ_EVENT_ID_SHIFT);
> + val |= (msg->data << IRQ_EVENT_ID_SHIFT);
> +
> + writel_relaxed(val, base);
> +}
> +
> +static int mbigen_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct irq_fwspec *fwspec,
> + unsigned long *hwirq,
> + unsigned int *type)
> +{
> + if (is_of_node(fwspec->fwnode)) {
> + if (fwspec->param_count != 2)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + *hwirq = fwspec->param[0];
You should validate the hwirq here. For instance, we never expect a
hwirq < RESERVED_IRQ_PER_MBIGEN_CHIP here.
> + *type = fwspec->param[1] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
Don't mask out bits you don't expect to be set. Validate that they
aren't set and complain if they are.
> @@ -50,6 +157,18 @@ static int mbigen_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(mgn_chip->base))
> return PTR_ERR(mgn_chip->base);
>
> + /* If there is no "num-msis" property, assume 64... */
> + if (of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "num-msis", &num_msis) < 0)
> + num_msis = 64;
The "num-msis" property was mandatory in the binding. We shouldn't need
the fallback.
It it is missing, print an error, and abort probing here.
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-11 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-23 3:15 [PATCH v9 0/4] irqchip:support mbigen interrupt controller MaJun
2015-11-23 3:15 ` [PATCH v9 1/4] dt-binding:Documents of the mbigen bindings MaJun
2015-12-03 16:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 15:01 ` majun
2015-12-11 15:26 ` Mark Rutland
2015-12-16 14:23 ` majun
2015-11-23 3:15 ` [PATCH v9 2/4] irqchip: add platform device driver for mbigen device MaJun
2015-12-03 16:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-23 3:15 ` [PATCH v9 3/4] irqchip:create irq domain for each " MaJun
2015-12-03 16:25 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-06 20:53 ` majun
2015-12-07 8:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-11 15:42 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-12-16 14:57 ` majun
2015-12-16 15:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-11-23 3:15 ` [PATCH v9 4/4] irqchip:implement the mbigen irq chip operation functions MaJun
2015-12-03 16:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-16 11:22 ` [PATCH v9 0/4] irqchip:support mbigen interrupt controller Marc Zyngier
2015-12-16 14:04 ` majun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151211154236.GF20666@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com \
--cc=guodong.xu@linaro.org \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@linaro.org \
--cc=huxinwei@huawei.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=klimov.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=liguozhu@hisilicon.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=majun258@huawei.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=usman.ahmad@linaro.org \
--cc=wei.chenwei@hisilicon.com \
--cc=wuyun.wu@huawei.com \
--cc=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
--cc=zhaojunhua@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).