From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dax: fix bdev NULL pointer dereferences
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:32:47 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160131023247.GZ2948@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4h-wv6oCK1-=zWM8Av4jaB0oHkSLjfH9Yg3JEZenSrw3Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:01:13PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > If we store the PFN of the underlying page instead, we don't have this
> > problem. Instead, we have a different problem; of the device going
> > away under us. I'm trying to find the code which tears down PTEs when
> > the device goes away, and I'm not seeing it. What do we do about user
> > mappings of the device?
>
> I deferred the dax tear down code until next cycle as Al rightly
> pointed out some needed re-works:
>
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2016-January/003995.html
Thanks; I eventually found it in my email somewhere over the Pacific.
I did probably 70% of the work needed to switch the radix tree over to
storing PFNs instead of sectors. It seems viable, though it's a big
change from where we are today:
fs/dax.c | 415 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
include/linux/dax.h | 3 +-
include/linux/pfn_t.h | 33 +++-
include/linux/radix-tree.h | 9 -
4 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 224 deletions(-)
I'll try and get that finished off this week.
One concrete and easily-separable piece is that dax_clear_blocks() has
the wrong signature. It currently takes an inode & block as parameters;
it has no way of finding out the correct block device. It's only two
callers are filesystems (ext2 and xfs). Those filesystems should be
passing the block_device instead of the inode. But without the inode,
we can't convert a block number to a sector number, so we also need
to pass the sector number, not the block number. It still has type
sector_t, annoyingly.
@@ -63,12 +238,11 @@ static void dax_unmap_atomic(struct block_device *bdev,
* and hence this means the stack from this point must follow GFP_NOFS
* semantics for all operations.
*/
-int dax_clear_blocks(struct inode *inode, sector_t block, long _size)
+int dax_clear_blocks(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector, long size)
{
- struct block_device *bdev = inode->i_sb->s_bdev;
struct blk_dax_ctl dax = {
- .sector = block << (inode->i_blkbits - 9),
- .size = _size,
+ .sector = sector,
+ .size = size,
};
might_sleep();
but I haven't looked at doing the conversion of xfs or ext2 to use that
new interface.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-31 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-28 19:35 [PATCH 1/2] block: fix pfn_mkwrite() DAX fault handler Ross Zwisler
2016-01-28 19:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] dax: fix bdev NULL pointer dereferences Ross Zwisler
2016-01-28 20:21 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-28 21:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-01-29 18:28 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-01-29 23:34 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-01-30 0:18 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-31 22:44 ` Dave Chinner
2016-01-30 5:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-30 6:01 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-30 7:08 ` Jared Hulbert
2016-01-31 2:32 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2016-01-31 6:12 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-01-31 10:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-31 16:38 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-31 18:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-31 18:18 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-31 18:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-31 18:50 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-31 19:51 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-01 13:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-02-01 14:51 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-01 20:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-02-01 21:47 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-02 6:06 ` Jared Hulbert
2016-02-02 6:46 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 8:05 ` Jared Hulbert
2016-02-02 16:51 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 21:46 ` Jared Hulbert
2016-02-03 0:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-02-03 1:21 ` Jared Hulbert
2016-02-02 11:17 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-02 16:33 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 16:46 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-02 17:10 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 17:34 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02 17:46 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 17:47 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 18:24 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02 18:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-02-02 18:59 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 20:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-02-03 11:09 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-03 10:46 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-03 20:13 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-04 9:15 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-04 23:38 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-06 23:15 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-07 5:27 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-04 19:56 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-04 20:29 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-04 22:19 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-05 22:25 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-06 23:40 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-07 6:43 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08 13:48 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-07 8:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 15:55 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02 18:41 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02 18:53 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02 0:02 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02 7:10 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-02 10:34 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160131023247.GZ2948@linux.intel.com \
--to=willy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).