From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@arm.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv7 PATCH 01/10] sched: Compute cpu capacity available at current frequency
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 10:14:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160226091446.GW6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1913831.CWh4G0m0Lj@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 02:37:19AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> That's all correct, but my question should rather be: is arch the right
> granularity?
>
> In theory, there may be ARM64-based platforms using ACPI and behaving
> like x86 in that respect in the future.
Ah, so I started these hooks way before the cpufreq/cpuidle etc.
integration push.
Maybe we should look at something like that, but performance is really
critical, you most definitely do not want 3 indirections just because
abstract framework crap, that's measurable overhead on these callsites.
Hence the current inline with constant value or single function call.
And if archs would want a selector, I would recommend boot time call
instruction rewrites a-la alternatives/paravirt.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-26 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-23 1:22 [RFCv7 PATCH 00/10] sched: scheduler-driven CPU frequency selection Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 01/10] sched: Compute cpu capacity available at current frequency Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-23 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-26 1:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-26 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 02/10] cpufreq: introduce cpufreq_driver_is_slow Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-26 0:50 ` Michael Turquette
2016-02-26 1:07 ` Steve Muckle
2016-02-26 1:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <20160226185503.2278.20479@quark.deferred.io>
2016-02-26 21:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 03/10] sched: scheduler-driven cpu frequency selection Steve Muckle
2016-02-25 3:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-25 9:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-25 9:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-26 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-27 0:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-01 12:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-01 19:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-25 11:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-26 0:34 ` Steve Muckle
2016-02-27 2:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-02-27 4:17 ` Steve Muckle
2016-02-28 2:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-01 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-01 20:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-01 13:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-01 13:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-02 7:49 ` Michael Turquette
2016-03-03 2:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-03 3:50 ` Steve Muckle
2016-03-03 9:34 ` Juri Lelli
2016-03-03 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-03 14:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 04/10] sched/fair: add triggers for OPP change requests Steve Muckle
2016-03-01 6:51 ` Ricky Liang
2016-03-03 3:55 ` Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 05/10] sched/{core,fair}: trigger OPP change request on fork() Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 06/10] sched/fair: cpufreq_sched triggers for load balancing Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 07/10] sched/fair: jump to max OPP when crossing UP threshold Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 08/10] sched: remove call of sched_avg_update from sched_rt_avg_update Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 09/10] sched/deadline: split rt_avg in 2 distincts metrics Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:22 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 10/10] sched: rt scheduler sets capacity requirement Steve Muckle
2016-02-23 1:33 ` [RFCv7 PATCH 00/10] sched: scheduler-driven CPU frequency selection Steve Muckle
2016-03-30 0:45 ` Yuyang Du
2016-03-31 1:35 ` Steve Muckle
2016-03-30 20:22 ` Yuyang Du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160226091446.GW6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=Juri.Lelli@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=steve.muckle@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).