* [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: zap oom_info_lock
@ 2016-03-11 10:11 Vladimir Davydov
2016-03-11 10:29 ` Michal Hocko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Davydov @ 2016-03-11 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Johannes Weiner, Michal Hocko, linux-mm, linux-kernel
mem_cgroup_print_oom_info is always called under oom_lock, so
oom_info_lock is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index fa7bf354ae32..36db05fa8acb 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1150,12 +1150,9 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_wait_acct_move(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
*/
void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct task_struct *p)
{
- /* oom_info_lock ensures that parallel ooms do not interleave */
- static DEFINE_MUTEX(oom_info_lock);
struct mem_cgroup *iter;
unsigned int i;
- mutex_lock(&oom_info_lock);
rcu_read_lock();
if (p) {
@@ -1199,7 +1196,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct task_struct *p)
pr_cont("\n");
}
- mutex_unlock(&oom_info_lock);
}
/*
--
2.1.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: zap oom_info_lock
2016-03-11 10:11 [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: zap oom_info_lock Vladimir Davydov
@ 2016-03-11 10:29 ` Michal Hocko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2016-03-11 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vladimir Davydov; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Johannes Weiner, linux-mm, linux-kernel
On Fri 11-03-16 13:11:23, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> mem_cgroup_print_oom_info is always called under oom_lock, so
> oom_info_lock is redundant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index fa7bf354ae32..36db05fa8acb 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -1150,12 +1150,9 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_wait_acct_move(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> */
> void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> - /* oom_info_lock ensures that parallel ooms do not interleave */
> - static DEFINE_MUTEX(oom_info_lock);
> struct mem_cgroup *iter;
> unsigned int i;
>
> - mutex_lock(&oom_info_lock);
> rcu_read_lock();
>
> if (p) {
> @@ -1199,7 +1196,6 @@ void mem_cgroup_print_oom_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct task_struct *p)
>
> pr_cont("\n");
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&oom_info_lock);
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.1.4
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-11 10:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-03-11 10:11 [PATCH] mm: memcontrol: zap oom_info_lock Vladimir Davydov
2016-03-11 10:29 ` Michal Hocko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).