linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Alfredo Alvarez Fernandez <alfredoalvarezfernandez@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
	"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-v4.6-rc1] ext4: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2692 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2017 __lock_acquire+0x180e/0x2260
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:59:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160330095954.GB14352@fixme-laptop.cn.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160330093659.GS3408@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2889 bytes --]

Hi Peter,

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:36:59AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:47:02AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > > You are right; this is lockdep running into a hash collision; which is a new 
> > > DEBUG_LOCKDEP test. See 9e4e7554e755 ("locking/lockdep: Detect chain_key 
> > > collisions").
> > 
> > I've Cc:-ed Alfredo Alvarez Fernandez who added that test.
> 
> OK, so while the code in check_no_collision() seems sensible, it relies
> on borken bits.
> 
> The whole chain_hlocks and /proc/lockdep_chains stuff appears to have
> been buggered from the start.
> 
> The below patch should fix this.
> 
> Furthermore, our hash function has definite room for improvement.
> 
> ---
>  include/linux/lockdep.h       |  8 +++++---
>  kernel/locking/lockdep.c      | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/lockdep.h b/include/linux/lockdep.h
> index d026b190c530..2568c120513b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lockdep.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lockdep.h
> @@ -196,9 +196,11 @@ struct lock_list {
>   * We record lock dependency chains, so that we can cache them:
>   */
>  struct lock_chain {
> -	u8				irq_context;
> -	u8				depth;
> -	u16				base;
> +	/* see BUILD_BUG_ON()s in lookup_chain_cache() */
> +	unsigned int			irq_context :  2,
> +					depth       :  6,
> +					base	    : 24;
> +	/* 4 byte hole */
>  	struct hlist_node		entry;
>  	u64				chain_key;
>  };
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> index 53ab2f85d77e..91a4b7780afb 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c

[...]

> @@ -2860,11 +2882,6 @@ static int separate_irq_context(struct task_struct *curr,
>  {
>  	unsigned int depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Keep track of points where we cross into an interrupt context:
> -	 */
> -	hlock->irq_context = 2*(curr->hardirq_context ? 1 : 0) +
> -				curr->softirq_context;
>  	if (depth) {
>  		struct held_lock *prev_hlock;
>  
> @@ -3164,6 +3181,7 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass,
>  	hlock->acquire_ip = ip;
>  	hlock->instance = lock;
>  	hlock->nest_lock = nest_lock;
> +	hlock->irq_context = 2*(!!curr->hardirq_context) + !!curr->softirq_context;
>  	hlock->trylock = trylock;
>  	hlock->read = read;
>  	hlock->check = check;

This is just for cleaning up, right? However ->hardirq_context and
->softirq_context only defined when CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS=y.

So we should use macro like current_hardirq_context() here? Or
considering the two helpers introduced in my RFC:

http://lkml.kernel.org/g/1455602265-16490-2-git-send-email-boqun.feng@gmail.com

if you don't think that overkills ;-)

Regards,
Boqun

[...]

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-30 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-27  8:15 [Linux-v4.6-rc1] ext4: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2692 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2017 __lock_acquire+0x180e/0x2260 Sedat Dilek
2016-03-27  8:57 ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-27 12:03   ` Linus Torvalds
2016-03-27 13:32     ` Boqun Feng
2016-03-27 18:23     ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-03-27 19:40       ` Sedat Dilek
     [not found]         ` <CA+55aFwoKRpgq8OCTxUaP+8gOg-mnN3nbruYgiK32a=C5U4TkQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-03-27 20:24           ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-27 20:48     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-27 20:59       ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-27 21:48         ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-28  1:05         ` Boqun Feng
2016-03-28  6:33           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-29  8:47       ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-30  9:20         ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-30  9:36           ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-30  9:36         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30  9:49           ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-30 10:33             ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-30 12:43             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30 12:46               ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-30 13:15                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30  9:50           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30  9:59           ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2016-03-30 10:36             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30 11:07               ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-31 15:42             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-31 15:52               ` Boqun Feng
2016-04-02  6:26               ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-30 14:06           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30 15:21             ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-30 17:03               ` [PATCH] lockdep: print chain_key collision information Alfredo Alvarez Fernandez
2016-03-30 17:19                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-01  6:36                 ` [tip:core/urgent] locking/lockdep: Print " tip-bot for Alfredo Alvarez Fernandez
2016-05-10  9:09                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-04 15:31             ` [Linux-v4.6-rc1] ext4: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2692 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2017 __lock_acquire+0x180e/0x2260 Sedat Dilek
2016-04-04 16:02               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09 11:37                 ` Sedat Dilek
2016-06-03 15:15             ` Sedat Dilek
2016-04-23 12:54           ` [tip:locking/urgent] lockdep: Fix lock_chain::base size tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160330095954.GB14352@fixme-laptop.cn.ibm.com \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=alfredoalvarezfernandez@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).