linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-v4.6-rc1] ext4: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2692 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2017 __lock_acquire+0x180e/0x2260
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 05:03:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFw-YXACVasN4n0h03QWgWWwvBray2fcMScAnEn0Wy_Ohw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUXgSK5VY7zJQ0bZZwKZmeYS+A7BRQD2fBBSzK=sM2aMLw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 1:57 AM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I pulled ext4.git#dev on top of Linux v4.6-rc1...
>
> ... and did not see the call-trace.

Unless you're using overlayfs or per-file encryption, I'm not seeing
that any of that should make any difference (but it's entirely
possible I'm missing something).

Was it entirely repeatable before? Maybe it just happened to happen
without that update, and then happened to _not_ happen after you
rebooted with that 'dev' branch pulled in?

Anyway, I don't think that DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON() in

  kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2017 __lock_acquire

would be an ext4 issue, it looks more like an internal lockdep issue.

Adding in the lockdep people, who will set me right.

                 Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-27 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-27  8:15 [Linux-v4.6-rc1] ext4: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2692 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2017 __lock_acquire+0x180e/0x2260 Sedat Dilek
2016-03-27  8:57 ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-27 12:03   ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2016-03-27 13:32     ` Boqun Feng
2016-03-27 18:23     ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-03-27 19:40       ` Sedat Dilek
     [not found]         ` <CA+55aFwoKRpgq8OCTxUaP+8gOg-mnN3nbruYgiK32a=C5U4TkQ@mail.gmail.com>
2016-03-27 20:24           ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-27 20:48     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-27 20:59       ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-27 21:48         ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-28  1:05         ` Boqun Feng
2016-03-28  6:33           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-29  8:47       ` Ingo Molnar
2016-03-30  9:20         ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-30  9:36           ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-30  9:36         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30  9:49           ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-30 10:33             ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-30 12:43             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30 12:46               ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-30 13:15                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30  9:50           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30  9:59           ` Boqun Feng
2016-03-30 10:36             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30 11:07               ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-31 15:42             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-31 15:52               ` Boqun Feng
2016-04-02  6:26               ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-30 14:06           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-30 15:21             ` Sedat Dilek
2016-03-30 17:03               ` [PATCH] lockdep: print chain_key collision information Alfredo Alvarez Fernandez
2016-03-30 17:19                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-01  6:36                 ` [tip:core/urgent] locking/lockdep: Print " tip-bot for Alfredo Alvarez Fernandez
2016-05-10  9:09                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-04 15:31             ` [Linux-v4.6-rc1] ext4: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 2692 at kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2017 __lock_acquire+0x180e/0x2260 Sedat Dilek
2016-04-04 16:02               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-09 11:37                 ` Sedat Dilek
2016-06-03 15:15             ` Sedat Dilek
2016-04-23 12:54           ` [tip:locking/urgent] lockdep: Fix lock_chain::base size tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+55aFw-YXACVasN4n0h03QWgWWwvBray2fcMScAnEn0Wy_Ohw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).