From: WANG Chao <wcwxyz@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched: unlikely corrupted stack end
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 16:24:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160614082423.6068-1-wcwxyz@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160614064306.48035-1-wcwxyz@gmail.com>
unlikely() was dropped in commit ce03e4137bb2 ("sched/core: Drop
unlikely behind BUG_ON()"), but commit 29d6455178a0 ("sched: panic on
corrupted stack end") dropped BUG_ON() and called panic directly.
Now we should bring unlikely() back for branch prediction. While we're
at it, it's better and cleaner to turn task_stack_end_corrupted() into
inline function.
Signed-off-by: WANG Chao <wcwxyz@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 6e42ada26345..797ca1975431 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -2997,8 +2997,11 @@ static inline unsigned long *end_of_stack(struct task_struct *p)
}
#endif
-#define task_stack_end_corrupted(task) \
- (*(end_of_stack(task)) != STACK_END_MAGIC)
+
+static inline int task_stack_end_corrupted(struct task_struct *p)
+{
+ return unlikely(*(end_of_stack(p)) != STACK_END_MAGIC);
+}
static inline int object_is_on_stack(void *obj)
{
--
2.8.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-14 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-14 6:43 [PATCH] sched: unlikely corrupted stack end WANG Chao
2016-06-14 7:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-14 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-14 8:24 ` WANG Chao [this message]
2016-06-14 8:56 ` [PATCH v2] " Ingo Molnar
2016-06-14 10:17 ` WANG Chao
2016-06-14 10:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-14 16:55 ` WANG Chao
2016-06-15 8:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-06-15 8:53 ` [PATCH v3] " WANG Chao
2016-06-14 9:08 ` [PATCH v2] " kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160614082423.6068-1-wcwxyz@gmail.com \
--to=wcwxyz@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).