From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr, nicolas.palix@imag.fr, mmarek@suse.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, markivx@codeaurora.org,
stephen.boyd@linaro.org, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
broonie@kernel.org, ming.lei@canonical.com, tiwai@suse.de,
johannes@sipsolutions.net, chunkeey@googlemail.com,
hauke@hauke-m.de, jwboyer@fedoraproject.org,
dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, jslaby@suse.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] scripts: add glimpse.sh for indexing the kernel
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 03:22:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160618012243.GD11948@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1606171732480.3164@hadrien>
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 05:35:26PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:44:26AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > I'm not sure that this is worth it. It adds a dependency on a tool that
> > > seems not to be well maintained. In terms of Coccinelle, I'm not sure
> > > that it gives a big benefit.
> > >
> > > Attached is a graph showing the file selection time for Coccinelle for a
> > > selection of fairly complex semantic patches. Coccigrep is just a
> > > line-by-line regexp search implemented in ocaml, gitgrep uses git grep.
> > > In most cases, glimpse is clearly faster.
> > >
> > > On the other hand, it seems that glimpse often selects more files.
> > > Sometimes a few more, eg 16 vs 14, and sometimes quite a lot more, eg 538
> > > vs 236. I suspect that this is because glimpse considers _ to be a space,
> > > and thus it can have many false positives. There are, however, a few
> > > cases where glimpse also selects fewer files.
> > >
> > > The file processing time (ie parsing the file, searching for, matches of
> > > the semantic patch in the file, and performing the transformation) is
> > > normally much higher than the file selection time.
> > >
> > > So it seems that git grep is currently a better option for the kernel.
> >
> > Great, thanks, consider this patch dropped, do we want the heuristics
> > for the cache index in place though or should I drop that as well ?
>
> I assume you mean this patch:
>
> [PATCH v2 3/8] coccicheck: add indexing enhancement options
>
> I think it should be dropped. It adds complexity and git grep works
> pretty well.
Hmm but coccicheck does not make use of --git-grep even.
> If people want to use something else, they can use SPARGS,
> or a .cocciconfig file, eg:
>
> [spatch]
> options = --use-glimpse
Neat will these be used last and thus override anything? If so, what about just
adding an upstream .cocciconfig with --use-gitgrep -- only issue then is
what if a user wants to use idutils ? How do we let them override?
Luis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-18 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-16 22:31 [PATCH v2 0/8] coccicheck: modernize Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-06-16 22:31 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] coccicheck: move spatch binary check up Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-06-16 22:31 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] coccicheck: enable parmap support Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-06-16 22:31 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] coccicheck: add indexing enhancement options Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-06-17 9:47 ` Julia Lawall
2016-06-17 15:12 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-06-17 15:29 ` Julia Lawall
2016-06-16 22:31 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] scripts: add glimpse.sh for indexing the kernel Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-06-17 9:44 ` Julia Lawall
2016-06-17 15:10 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-06-17 15:35 ` Julia Lawall
2016-06-18 1:22 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2016-06-18 5:51 ` Julia Lawall
2016-06-20 19:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-06-18 10:37 ` Julia Lawall
2016-06-18 10:38 ` Julia Lawall
2016-06-17 15:18 ` [Cocci] " SF Markus Elfring
2016-06-17 16:11 ` Julia Lawall
2016-06-16 22:31 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] coccicheck: replace --very-quiet with --quit when debugging Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-06-16 22:31 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] coccicheck: add support for requring a coccinelle version Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-06-16 22:31 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] coccicheck: refer to coccicheck bottest wiki for documentation Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-06-16 22:31 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] scripts/coccinelle: require coccinelle >= 1.0.4 on device_node_continue.cocci Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160618012243.GD11948@wotan.suse.de \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=jslaby@suse.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=jwboyer@fedoraproject.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markivx@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
--cc=mmarek@suse.com \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
--cc=stephen.boyd@linaro.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).