linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix to set superblock dirty correctly
@ 2016-08-28 13:20 Chao Yu
  2016-08-29 16:45 ` Jaegeuk Kim
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2016-08-28 13:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jaegeuk; +Cc: linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, Chao Yu

From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>

tests/generic/251 of fstest suit complains us with below message:

------------[ cut here ]------------
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
CPU: 2 PID: 7698 Comm: fstrim Tainted: G           O    4.7.0+ #21
task: e9f4e000 task.stack: e7262000
EIP: 0060:[<f89fcefe>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 2
EIP is at write_checkpoint+0xfde/0x1020 [f2fs]
EAX: f33eb300 EBX: eecac310 ECX: 00000001 EDX: ffff0001
ESI: eecac000 EDI: eecac5f0 EBP: e7263dec ESP: e7263d18
 DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
CR0: 80050033 CR2: b76ab01c CR3: 2eb89de0 CR4: 000406f0
Stack:
 00000001 a220fb7b e9f4e000 00000002 419ff2d3 b3a05151 00000002 e9f4e5d8
 e9f4e000 419ff2d3 b3a05151 eecac310 c10b8154 b3a05151 419ff2d3 c10b78bd
 e9f4e000 e9f4e000 e9f4e5d8 00000001 e9f4e000 ec409000 eecac2cc eecac288
Call Trace:
 [<c10b8154>] ? __lock_acquire+0x3c4/0x760
 [<c10b78bd>] ? mark_held_locks+0x5d/0x80
 [<f8a10632>] f2fs_trim_fs+0x1c2/0x2e0 [f2fs]
 [<f89e9f56>] f2fs_ioctl+0x6b6/0x10b0 [f2fs]
 [<c13d51df>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x20
 [<c10b4281>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x91/0x120
 [<f89e98a0>] ? __exchange_data_block+0xd30/0xd30 [f2fs]
 [<c120b2e1>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x81/0x7f0
 [<c11d57c5>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x245/0x2e0
 [<c1217840>] ? get_unused_fd_flags+0x40/0x40
 [<c1206eec>] ? putname+0x4c/0x50
 [<c11f631e>] ? do_sys_open+0x16e/0x1d0
 [<c1001990>] ? do_fast_syscall_32+0x30/0x1c0
 [<c13d51df>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x20
 [<c120baa8>] SyS_ioctl+0x58/0x80
 [<c1001a01>] do_fast_syscall_32+0xa1/0x1c0
 [<c178cc54>] sysenter_past_esp+0x45/0x74
EIP: [<f89fcefe>] write_checkpoint+0xfde/0x1020 [f2fs] SS:ESP 0068:e7263d18
---[ end trace 4de95d7e6b3aa7c6 ]---

The reason is: with below call stack, we will encounter BUG_ON during
doing fstrim.

Thread A				Thread B
- write_checkpoint
 - do_checkpoint
					- f2fs_write_inode
					 - update_inode_page
					  - update_inode
					   - set_page_dirty
					    - f2fs_set_node_page_dirty
					     - inc_page_count
					      - percpu_counter_inc
					      - set_sbi_flag(SBI_IS_DIRTY)
  - clear_sbi_flag(SBI_IS_DIRTY)

Thread C				Thread D
- f2fs_write_node_page
 - set_node_addr
  - __set_nat_cache_dirty
   - nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt++
					- do_vfs_ioctl
					 - f2fs_ioctl
					  - f2fs_trim_fs
					   - write_checkpoint
					    - f2fs_bug_on(nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt)

Fix it by setting superblock dirty correctly in do_checkpoint and
f2fs_write_node_page.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
---
 fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 8 ++++++++
 fs/f2fs/node.c       | 1 +
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
index cd0443d..1864078 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
@@ -1153,6 +1153,14 @@ static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
 	clear_prefree_segments(sbi, cpc);
 	clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_DIRTY);
 
+	/*
+	 * redirty superblock if metadata like node page or inode cache is
+	 * updated during writting checkpoint.
+	 */
+	if (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES) ||
+			get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_IMETA))
+		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_DIRTY);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 8a28800..365c6ff 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1597,6 +1597,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_node_page(struct page *page,
 	fio.old_blkaddr = ni.blk_addr;
 	write_node_page(nid, &fio);
 	set_node_addr(sbi, &ni, fio.new_blkaddr, is_fsync_dnode(page));
+	set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_DIRTY);
 	dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
 	up_read(&sbi->node_write);
 
-- 
2.7.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix to set superblock dirty correctly
  2016-08-28 13:20 [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix to set superblock dirty correctly Chao Yu
@ 2016-08-29 16:45 ` Jaegeuk Kim
  2016-08-30 16:13   ` Chao Yu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jaegeuk Kim @ 2016-08-29 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel, Chao Yu

Hi Chao,

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 09:20:46PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> 
> tests/generic/251 of fstest suit complains us with below message:
> 
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> CPU: 2 PID: 7698 Comm: fstrim Tainted: G           O    4.7.0+ #21
> task: e9f4e000 task.stack: e7262000
> EIP: 0060:[<f89fcefe>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 2
> EIP is at write_checkpoint+0xfde/0x1020 [f2fs]
> EAX: f33eb300 EBX: eecac310 ECX: 00000001 EDX: ffff0001
> ESI: eecac000 EDI: eecac5f0 EBP: e7263dec ESP: e7263d18
>  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
> CR0: 80050033 CR2: b76ab01c CR3: 2eb89de0 CR4: 000406f0
> Stack:
>  00000001 a220fb7b e9f4e000 00000002 419ff2d3 b3a05151 00000002 e9f4e5d8
>  e9f4e000 419ff2d3 b3a05151 eecac310 c10b8154 b3a05151 419ff2d3 c10b78bd
>  e9f4e000 e9f4e000 e9f4e5d8 00000001 e9f4e000 ec409000 eecac2cc eecac288
> Call Trace:
>  [<c10b8154>] ? __lock_acquire+0x3c4/0x760
>  [<c10b78bd>] ? mark_held_locks+0x5d/0x80
>  [<f8a10632>] f2fs_trim_fs+0x1c2/0x2e0 [f2fs]
>  [<f89e9f56>] f2fs_ioctl+0x6b6/0x10b0 [f2fs]
>  [<c13d51df>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x20
>  [<c10b4281>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x91/0x120
>  [<f89e98a0>] ? __exchange_data_block+0xd30/0xd30 [f2fs]
>  [<c120b2e1>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x81/0x7f0
>  [<c11d57c5>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x245/0x2e0
>  [<c1217840>] ? get_unused_fd_flags+0x40/0x40
>  [<c1206eec>] ? putname+0x4c/0x50
>  [<c11f631e>] ? do_sys_open+0x16e/0x1d0
>  [<c1001990>] ? do_fast_syscall_32+0x30/0x1c0
>  [<c13d51df>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x20
>  [<c120baa8>] SyS_ioctl+0x58/0x80
>  [<c1001a01>] do_fast_syscall_32+0xa1/0x1c0
>  [<c178cc54>] sysenter_past_esp+0x45/0x74
> EIP: [<f89fcefe>] write_checkpoint+0xfde/0x1020 [f2fs] SS:ESP 0068:e7263d18
> ---[ end trace 4de95d7e6b3aa7c6 ]---
> 
> The reason is: with below call stack, we will encounter BUG_ON during
> doing fstrim.
> 
> Thread A				Thread B
> - write_checkpoint
>  - do_checkpoint
> 					- f2fs_write_inode
> 					 - update_inode_page
> 					  - update_inode
> 					   - set_page_dirty
> 					    - f2fs_set_node_page_dirty
> 					     - inc_page_count
> 					      - percpu_counter_inc
> 					      - set_sbi_flag(SBI_IS_DIRTY)
>   - clear_sbi_flag(SBI_IS_DIRTY)
> 
> Thread C				Thread D
> - f2fs_write_node_page
>  - set_node_addr
>   - __set_nat_cache_dirty
>    - nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt++
> 					- do_vfs_ioctl
> 					 - f2fs_ioctl
> 					  - f2fs_trim_fs
> 					   - write_checkpoint
> 					    - f2fs_bug_on(nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt)
> 
> Fix it by setting superblock dirty correctly in do_checkpoint and
> f2fs_write_node_page.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 8 ++++++++
>  fs/f2fs/node.c       | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> index cd0443d..1864078 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> @@ -1153,6 +1153,14 @@ static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>  	clear_prefree_segments(sbi, cpc);
>  	clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_DIRTY);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * redirty superblock if metadata like node page or inode cache is
> +	 * updated during writting checkpoint.
> +	 */
> +	if (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES) ||
> +			get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_IMETA))
> +		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_DIRTY);

How about adding f2fs_bug_on(get_pages(sb, F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS)); ?

> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 8a28800..365c6ff 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1597,6 +1597,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_node_page(struct page *page,
>  	fio.old_blkaddr = ni.blk_addr;
>  	write_node_page(nid, &fio);
>  	set_node_addr(sbi, &ni, fio.new_blkaddr, is_fsync_dnode(page));
> +	set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_DIRTY);

It doesn't need to set this, right?

Thanks,

>  	dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
>  	up_read(&sbi->node_write);
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.2

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix to set superblock dirty correctly
  2016-08-29 16:45 ` Jaegeuk Kim
@ 2016-08-30 16:13   ` Chao Yu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2016-08-30 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jaegeuk Kim, Chao Yu; +Cc: linux-f2fs-devel, linux-kernel

Hi Jaegeuk,

On 2016/8/30 0:45, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Chao,
> 
> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 09:20:46PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>>
>> tests/generic/251 of fstest suit complains us with below message:
>>
>> ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>> CPU: 2 PID: 7698 Comm: fstrim Tainted: G           O    4.7.0+ #21
>> task: e9f4e000 task.stack: e7262000
>> EIP: 0060:[<f89fcefe>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 2
>> EIP is at write_checkpoint+0xfde/0x1020 [f2fs]
>> EAX: f33eb300 EBX: eecac310 ECX: 00000001 EDX: ffff0001
>> ESI: eecac000 EDI: eecac5f0 EBP: e7263dec ESP: e7263d18
>>  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
>> CR0: 80050033 CR2: b76ab01c CR3: 2eb89de0 CR4: 000406f0
>> Stack:
>>  00000001 a220fb7b e9f4e000 00000002 419ff2d3 b3a05151 00000002 e9f4e5d8
>>  e9f4e000 419ff2d3 b3a05151 eecac310 c10b8154 b3a05151 419ff2d3 c10b78bd
>>  e9f4e000 e9f4e000 e9f4e5d8 00000001 e9f4e000 ec409000 eecac2cc eecac288
>> Call Trace:
>>  [<c10b8154>] ? __lock_acquire+0x3c4/0x760
>>  [<c10b78bd>] ? mark_held_locks+0x5d/0x80
>>  [<f8a10632>] f2fs_trim_fs+0x1c2/0x2e0 [f2fs]
>>  [<f89e9f56>] f2fs_ioctl+0x6b6/0x10b0 [f2fs]
>>  [<c13d51df>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x20
>>  [<c10b4281>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x91/0x120
>>  [<f89e98a0>] ? __exchange_data_block+0xd30/0xd30 [f2fs]
>>  [<c120b2e1>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x81/0x7f0
>>  [<c11d57c5>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x245/0x2e0
>>  [<c1217840>] ? get_unused_fd_flags+0x40/0x40
>>  [<c1206eec>] ? putname+0x4c/0x50
>>  [<c11f631e>] ? do_sys_open+0x16e/0x1d0
>>  [<c1001990>] ? do_fast_syscall_32+0x30/0x1c0
>>  [<c13d51df>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0xf/0x20
>>  [<c120baa8>] SyS_ioctl+0x58/0x80
>>  [<c1001a01>] do_fast_syscall_32+0xa1/0x1c0
>>  [<c178cc54>] sysenter_past_esp+0x45/0x74
>> EIP: [<f89fcefe>] write_checkpoint+0xfde/0x1020 [f2fs] SS:ESP 0068:e7263d18
>> ---[ end trace 4de95d7e6b3aa7c6 ]---
>>
>> The reason is: with below call stack, we will encounter BUG_ON during
>> doing fstrim.
>>
>> Thread A				Thread B
>> - write_checkpoint
>>  - do_checkpoint
>> 					- f2fs_write_inode
>> 					 - update_inode_page
>> 					  - update_inode
>> 					   - set_page_dirty
>> 					    - f2fs_set_node_page_dirty
>> 					     - inc_page_count
>> 					      - percpu_counter_inc
>> 					      - set_sbi_flag(SBI_IS_DIRTY)
>>   - clear_sbi_flag(SBI_IS_DIRTY)
>>
>> Thread C				Thread D
>> - f2fs_write_node_page
>>  - set_node_addr
>>   - __set_nat_cache_dirty
>>    - nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt++
>> 					- do_vfs_ioctl
>> 					 - f2fs_ioctl
>> 					  - f2fs_trim_fs
>> 					   - write_checkpoint
>> 					    - f2fs_bug_on(nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt)
>>
>> Fix it by setting superblock dirty correctly in do_checkpoint and
>> f2fs_write_node_page.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 8 ++++++++
>>  fs/f2fs/node.c       | 1 +
>>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> index cd0443d..1864078 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> @@ -1153,6 +1153,14 @@ static int do_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc)
>>  	clear_prefree_segments(sbi, cpc);
>>  	clear_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_DIRTY);
>>  
>> +	/*
>> +	 * redirty superblock if metadata like node page or inode cache is
>> +	 * updated during writting checkpoint.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES) ||
>> +			get_pages(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_IMETA))
>> +		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_DIRTY);
> 
> How about adding f2fs_bug_on(get_pages(sb, F2FS_DIRTY_DENTS)); ?

That's right, I will add it.

> 
>> +
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>> index 8a28800..365c6ff 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>> @@ -1597,6 +1597,7 @@ static int f2fs_write_node_page(struct page *page,
>>  	fio.old_blkaddr = ni.blk_addr;
>>  	write_node_page(nid, &fio);
>>  	set_node_addr(sbi, &ni, fio.new_blkaddr, is_fsync_dnode(page));
>> +	set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_DIRTY);
> 
> It doesn't need to set this, right?

Agree, let me resend the patch. :)

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>>  	dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
>>  	up_read(&sbi->node_write);
>>  
>> -- 
>> 2.7.2
> 
> .
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-30 16:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-28 13:20 [PATCH v2] f2fs: fix to set superblock dirty correctly Chao Yu
2016-08-29 16:45 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-30 16:13   ` Chao Yu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).