[PATCH] documentation: fix broken lkml archive links in RCU requirements

[PATCH] documentation: fix broken lkml archive links in RCU requirements

[Michael Opdenacker]

Fix 4 LKML archive links that became broken (data loss
on mail-archive.com?)

Working links were found on Paul McKenney's RCU articles
on LWN.net, from which the documentation originates:
http://lwn.net/Articles/652156/
http://lwn.net/Articles/652677/
http://lwn.net/Articles/653326/

Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
---
 Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
index ece410f40436..2adb3d43ce44 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
@@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ However, as I learned from Matt Mackall's
 <a href="http://elinux.org/Linux_Tiny-FAQ">bloatwatch</a>
 efforts, memory footprint is critically important on single-CPU systems with
 non-preemptible (<tt>CONFIG_PREEMPT=n</tt>) kernels, and thus
-<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/20090113221724.GA15307@linux.vnet.ibm.com">tiny RCU</a>
+<a href="http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/449">tiny RCU</a>
 was born.
 Josh Triplett has since taken over the small-memory banner with his
 <a href="https://tiny.wiki.kernel.org/">Linux kernel tinification</a>
@@ -1975,7 +1975,7 @@ guard against mishaps and misuse:
 	and cleaned up with <tt>destroy_rcu_head()</tt>.
 	Mathieu Desnoyers made me aware of this requirement, and also
 	supplied the needed
-	<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/20100319013024.GA28456@Krystal">patch</a>.
+	<a href="https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/18/417">patch</a>.
 <li>	An infinite loop in an RCU read-side critical section will
 	eventually trigger an RCU CPU stall warning splat, with
 	the duration of &ldquo;eventually&rdquo; being controlled by the
@@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@ be hidden behind a <tt>CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT</tt> <tt>Kconfig</tt> option.
 <p>
 This all should be quite obvious, but the fact remains that
 Linus Torvalds recently had to
-<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/CA+55aFy4wcCwaL4okTs8wXhGZ5h-ibecy_Meg9C4MNQrUnwMcg@mail.gmail.com">remind</a>
+<a href="https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/14/616">remind</a>
 me of this requirement.
 
 <h3><a name="Firmware Interface">Firmware Interface</a></h3>
@@ -2229,7 +2229,7 @@ Thankfully, RCU update-side primitives, including
 The name notwithstanding, some Linux-kernel architectures
 can have nested NMIs, which RCU must handle correctly.
 Andy Lutomirski
-<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/CALCETrXLq1y7e_dKFPgou-FKHB6Pu-r8+t-6Ds+8=va7anBWDA@mail.gmail.com">surprised me</a>
+<a href="https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/21/642">surprised me</a>
 with this requirement;
 he also kindly surprised me with
 <a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/CALCETrXSY9JpW3uE6H8WYk81sg56qasA2aqmjMPsq5dOtzso=g@mail.gmail.com">an algorithm</a>
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH] documentation: fix broken lkml archive links in RCU requirements

[Richard Weinberger]

Michael,

On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Michael Opdenacker
<michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Fix 4 LKML archive links that became broken (data loss
> on mail-archive.com?)
>
> Working links were found on Paul McKenney's RCU articles
> on LWN.net, from which the documentation originates:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/652156/
> http://lwn.net/Articles/652677/
> http://lwn.net/Articles/653326/
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
> index ece410f40436..2adb3d43ce44 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
> @@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ However, as I learned from Matt Mackall's
>  <a href="http://elinux.org/Linux_Tiny-FAQ">bloatwatch</a>
>  efforts, memory footprint is critically important on single-CPU systems with
>  non-preemptible (<tt>CONFIG_PREEMPT=n</tt>) kernels, and thus
> -<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/20090113221724.GA15307@linux.vnet.ibm.com">tiny RCU</a>
> +<a href="http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/449">tiny RCU</a>
>  was born.
>  Josh Triplett has since taken over the small-memory banner with his
>  <a href="https://tiny.wiki.kernel.org/">Linux kernel tinification</a>
> @@ -1975,7 +1975,7 @@ guard against mishaps and misuse:
>         and cleaned up with <tt>destroy_rcu_head()</tt>.
>         Mathieu Desnoyers made me aware of this requirement, and also
>         supplied the needed
> -       <a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/20100319013024.GA28456@Krystal">patch</a>.
> +       <a href="https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/18/417">patch</a>.

Please don't add lkml.org. It does not use message ids for indexing.
With knowing the message id you can query any other archive.
e.g. http://marc.info/?i=20100319013024.GA28456@Krystal
By adding lkml.org you kill that information. Archives come and go,
the message id is the only common query id we have.

IMHO kernel.org admins should fix/improve their redirection service to
point to a working service.

-- 
Thanks,
//richard

Re: [PATCH] documentation: fix broken lkml archive links in RCU requirements

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 04:17:14PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Michael,
> 
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Michael Opdenacker
> <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > Fix 4 LKML archive links that became broken (data loss
> > on mail-archive.com?)
> >
> > Working links were found on Paul McKenney's RCU articles
> > on LWN.net, from which the documentation originates:
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/652156/
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/652677/
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/653326/
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
> > index ece410f40436..2adb3d43ce44 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
> > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
> > @@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ However, as I learned from Matt Mackall's
> >  <a href="http://elinux.org/Linux_Tiny-FAQ">bloatwatch</a>
> >  efforts, memory footprint is critically important on single-CPU systems with
> >  non-preemptible (<tt>CONFIG_PREEMPT=n</tt>) kernels, and thus
> > -<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/20090113221724.GA15307@linux.vnet.ibm.com">tiny RCU</a>
> > +<a href="http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/449">tiny RCU</a>
> >  was born.
> >  Josh Triplett has since taken over the small-memory banner with his
> >  <a href="https://tiny.wiki.kernel.org/">Linux kernel tinification</a>
> > @@ -1975,7 +1975,7 @@ guard against mishaps and misuse:
> >         and cleaned up with <tt>destroy_rcu_head()</tt>.
> >         Mathieu Desnoyers made me aware of this requirement, and also
> >         supplied the needed
> > -       <a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/20100319013024.GA28456@Krystal">patch</a>.
> > +       <a href="https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/18/417">patch</a>.
> 
> Please don't add lkml.org. It does not use message ids for indexing.
> With knowing the message id you can query any other archive.
> e.g. http://marc.info/?i=20100319013024.GA28456@Krystal
> By adding lkml.org you kill that information. Archives come and go,
> the message id is the only common query id we have.
> 
> IMHO kernel.org admins should fix/improve their redirection service to
> point to a working service.

There has been some instability in the kernel.org redirection.  Right
now, the /r/ services seems to work, though as noted the /g/ does not.
Please report this to the Kernel.org administrators:

	https://kernel.org/category/contact-us.html

							Thanx, Paul

Re: [PATCH] documentation: fix broken lkml archive links in RCU requirements

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 16:17:14 +0200
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
> > index ece410f40436..2adb3d43ce44 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
> > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
> > @@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ However, as I learned from Matt Mackall's
> >  <a href="http://elinux.org/Linux_Tiny-FAQ">bloatwatch</a>
> >  efforts, memory footprint is critically important on single-CPU systems with
> >  non-preemptible (<tt>CONFIG_PREEMPT=n</tt>) kernels, and thus
> > -<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/20090113221724.GA15307@linux.vnet.ibm.com">tiny RCU</a>
> > +<a href="http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/14/449">tiny RCU</a>
> >  was born.
> >  Josh Triplett has since taken over the small-memory banner with his
> >  <a href="https://tiny.wiki.kernel.org/">Linux kernel tinification</a>
> > @@ -1975,7 +1975,7 @@ guard against mishaps and misuse:
> >         and cleaned up with <tt>destroy_rcu_head()</tt>.
> >         Mathieu Desnoyers made me aware of this requirement, and also
> >         supplied the needed
> > -       <a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/20100319013024.GA28456@Krystal">patch</a>.
> > +       <a href="https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/18/417">patch</a>.  
> 
> Please don't add lkml.org. It does not use message ids for indexing.
> With knowing the message id you can query any other archive.
> e.g. http://marc.info/?i=20100319013024.GA28456@Krystal
> By adding lkml.org you kill that information. Archives come and go,
> the message id is the only common query id we have.
> 
> IMHO kernel.org admins should fix/improve their redirection service to
> point to a working service.
> 

Correct, we avoid any links to lkml.org at all costs. Simple do a

s,/g/,/r/, and all your links should work. For example, using the above
mentioned link:

 https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20100319013024.GA28456@Krystal

Works as expected.

-- Steve

Re: [PATCH] documentation: fix broken lkml archive links in RCU requirements

[Michael Opdenacker]

Richard, Paul,

Thank you for your replies!

On 09/09/2016 16:33, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 04:17:14PM +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Please don't add lkml.org. It does not use message ids for indexing.
> With knowing the message id you can query any other archive.
> e.g. http://marc.info/?i=20100319013024.GA28456@Krystal
> By adding lkml.org you kill that information. Archives come and go,
> the message id is the only common query id we have.
>
> IMHO kernel.org admins should fix/improve their redirection service to
> point to a working service.
> There has been some instability in the kernel.org redirection.  Right
> now, the /r/ services seems to work, though as noted the /g/ does not.
> Please report this to the Kernel.org administrators:
>
> 	https://kernel.org/category/contact-us.html
>
> 							Thanx, Paul

Done. I reported this issue to them and will keep an eye on it. I 
definitely agree that we shouldn't use the message ids. Otherwise, 
that's really a lot of detective work to find out which message was 
referred to. That's very good advise.

Thanks,

Michael.

-- 
Michael Opdenacker, CEO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH] documentation: fix broken lkml archive links in RCU requirements

[Michael Opdenacker]

Hi Steve,

On 09/09/2016 16:34, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Correct, we avoid any links to lkml.org at all costs. Simple do a
>
> s,/g/,/r/, and all your links should work. For example, using the above
> mentioned link:
>
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20100319013024.GA28456@Krystal
>
> Works as expected.

I confirm that all the links work indeed. I'm sending a patch update 
right away.

Thanks!

Michael.

-- 
Michael Opdenacker, CEO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[PATCH] documentation: fix broken lkml archive links in RCU requirements

[Michael Opdenacker]

Fix 4 LKML archive links that became broken
(issue with https://lkml.kernel.org/g/ redirection links)

Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
---
 Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
index ece410f40436..1c39a2362911 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
@@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ However, as I learned from Matt Mackall's
 <a href="http://elinux.org/Linux_Tiny-FAQ">bloatwatch</a>
 efforts, memory footprint is critically important on single-CPU systems with
 non-preemptible (<tt>CONFIG_PREEMPT=n</tt>) kernels, and thus
-<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/20090113221724.GA15307@linux.vnet.ibm.com">tiny RCU</a>
+<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20090113221724.GA15307@linux.vnet.ibm.com">tiny RCU</a>
 was born.
 Josh Triplett has since taken over the small-memory banner with his
 <a href="https://tiny.wiki.kernel.org/">Linux kernel tinification</a>
@@ -1975,7 +1975,7 @@ guard against mishaps and misuse:
 	and cleaned up with <tt>destroy_rcu_head()</tt>.
 	Mathieu Desnoyers made me aware of this requirement, and also
 	supplied the needed
-	<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/20100319013024.GA28456@Krystal">patch</a>.
+	<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20100319013024.GA28456@Krystal">patch</a>.
 <li>	An infinite loop in an RCU read-side critical section will
 	eventually trigger an RCU CPU stall warning splat, with
 	the duration of &ldquo;eventually&rdquo; being controlled by the
@@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@ be hidden behind a <tt>CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT</tt> <tt>Kconfig</tt> option.
 <p>
 This all should be quite obvious, but the fact remains that
 Linus Torvalds recently had to
-<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/CA+55aFy4wcCwaL4okTs8wXhGZ5h-ibecy_Meg9C4MNQrUnwMcg@mail.gmail.com">remind</a>
+<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFy4wcCwaL4okTs8wXhGZ5h-ibecy_Meg9C4MNQrUnwMcg@mail.gmail.com">remind</a>
 me of this requirement.
 
 <h3><a name="Firmware Interface">Firmware Interface</a></h3>
@@ -2229,7 +2229,7 @@ Thankfully, RCU update-side primitives, including
 The name notwithstanding, some Linux-kernel architectures
 can have nested NMIs, which RCU must handle correctly.
 Andy Lutomirski
-<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/CALCETrXLq1y7e_dKFPgou-FKHB6Pu-r8+t-6Ds+8=va7anBWDA@mail.gmail.com">surprised me</a>
+<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrXLq1y7e_dKFPgou-FKHB6Pu-r8+t-6Ds+8=va7anBWDA@mail.gmail.com">surprised me</a>
 with this requirement;
 he also kindly surprised me with
 <a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/CALCETrXSY9JpW3uE6H8WYk81sg56qasA2aqmjMPsq5dOtzso=g@mail.gmail.com">an algorithm</a>
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH] documentation: fix broken lkml archive links in RCU requirements

[Steven Rostedt]

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 14:17:06 +0200
Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com> wrote:

> Fix 4 LKML archive links that became broken
> (issue with https://lkml.kernel.org/g/ redirection links)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
> index ece410f40436..1c39a2362911 100644
> --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
> +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
> @@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ However, as I learned from Matt Mackall's
>  <a href="http://elinux.org/Linux_Tiny-FAQ">bloatwatch</a>
>  efforts, memory footprint is critically important on single-CPU systems with
>  non-preemptible (<tt>CONFIG_PREEMPT=n</tt>) kernels, and thus
> -<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/20090113221724.GA15307@linux.vnet.ibm.com">tiny RCU</a>
> +<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20090113221724.GA15307@linux.vnet.ibm.com">tiny RCU</a>
>  was born.
>  Josh Triplett has since taken over the small-memory banner with his
>  <a href="https://tiny.wiki.kernel.org/">Linux kernel tinification</a>
> @@ -1975,7 +1975,7 @@ guard against mishaps and misuse:
>  	and cleaned up with <tt>destroy_rcu_head()</tt>.
>  	Mathieu Desnoyers made me aware of this requirement, and also
>  	supplied the needed
> -	<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/20100319013024.GA28456@Krystal">patch</a>.
> +	<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20100319013024.GA28456@Krystal">patch</a>.
>  <li>	An infinite loop in an RCU read-side critical section will
>  	eventually trigger an RCU CPU stall warning splat, with
>  	the duration of &ldquo;eventually&rdquo; being controlled by the
> @@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@ be hidden behind a <tt>CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT</tt> <tt>Kconfig</tt> option.
>  <p>
>  This all should be quite obvious, but the fact remains that
>  Linus Torvalds recently had to
> -<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/CA+55aFy4wcCwaL4okTs8wXhGZ5h-ibecy_Meg9C4MNQrUnwMcg@mail.gmail.com">remind</a>
> +<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFy4wcCwaL4okTs8wXhGZ5h-ibecy_Meg9C4MNQrUnwMcg@mail.gmail.com">remind</a>
>  me of this requirement.
>  
>  <h3><a name="Firmware Interface">Firmware Interface</a></h3>
> @@ -2229,7 +2229,7 @@ Thankfully, RCU update-side primitives, including
>  The name notwithstanding, some Linux-kernel architectures
>  can have nested NMIs, which RCU must handle correctly.
>  Andy Lutomirski
> -<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/CALCETrXLq1y7e_dKFPgou-FKHB6Pu-r8+t-6Ds+8=va7anBWDA@mail.gmail.com">surprised me</a>
> +<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrXLq1y7e_dKFPgou-FKHB6Pu-r8+t-6Ds+8=va7anBWDA@mail.gmail.com">surprised me</a>
>  with this requirement;
>  he also kindly surprised me with
>  <a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/CALCETrXSY9JpW3uE6H8WYk81sg56qasA2aqmjMPsq5dOtzso=g@mail.gmail.com">an algorithm</a>

Strange that this one still works. Anyway...


Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

-- Steve

Re: [PATCH] documentation: fix broken lkml archive links in RCU requirements

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:18:28AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 14:17:06 +0200
> Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> 
> > Fix 4 LKML archive links that became broken
> > (issue with https://lkml.kernel.org/g/ redirection links)
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
> > index ece410f40436..1c39a2362911 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
> > +++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Requirements/Requirements.html
> > @@ -1527,7 +1527,7 @@ However, as I learned from Matt Mackall's
> >  <a href="http://elinux.org/Linux_Tiny-FAQ">bloatwatch</a>
> >  efforts, memory footprint is critically important on single-CPU systems with
> >  non-preemptible (<tt>CONFIG_PREEMPT=n</tt>) kernels, and thus
> > -<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/20090113221724.GA15307@linux.vnet.ibm.com">tiny RCU</a>
> > +<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20090113221724.GA15307@linux.vnet.ibm.com">tiny RCU</a>
> >  was born.
> >  Josh Triplett has since taken over the small-memory banner with his
> >  <a href="https://tiny.wiki.kernel.org/">Linux kernel tinification</a>
> > @@ -1975,7 +1975,7 @@ guard against mishaps and misuse:
> >  	and cleaned up with <tt>destroy_rcu_head()</tt>.
> >  	Mathieu Desnoyers made me aware of this requirement, and also
> >  	supplied the needed
> > -	<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/20100319013024.GA28456@Krystal">patch</a>.
> > +	<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20100319013024.GA28456@Krystal">patch</a>.
> >  <li>	An infinite loop in an RCU read-side critical section will
> >  	eventually trigger an RCU CPU stall warning splat, with
> >  	the duration of &ldquo;eventually&rdquo; being controlled by the
> > @@ -2088,7 +2088,7 @@ be hidden behind a <tt>CONFIG_RCU_EXPERT</tt> <tt>Kconfig</tt> option.
> >  <p>
> >  This all should be quite obvious, but the fact remains that
> >  Linus Torvalds recently had to
> > -<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/CA+55aFy4wcCwaL4okTs8wXhGZ5h-ibecy_Meg9C4MNQrUnwMcg@mail.gmail.com">remind</a>
> > +<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFy4wcCwaL4okTs8wXhGZ5h-ibecy_Meg9C4MNQrUnwMcg@mail.gmail.com">remind</a>
> >  me of this requirement.
> >  
> >  <h3><a name="Firmware Interface">Firmware Interface</a></h3>
> > @@ -2229,7 +2229,7 @@ Thankfully, RCU update-side primitives, including
> >  The name notwithstanding, some Linux-kernel architectures
> >  can have nested NMIs, which RCU must handle correctly.
> >  Andy Lutomirski
> > -<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/CALCETrXLq1y7e_dKFPgou-FKHB6Pu-r8+t-6Ds+8=va7anBWDA@mail.gmail.com">surprised me</a>
> > +<a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CALCETrXLq1y7e_dKFPgou-FKHB6Pu-r8+t-6Ds+8=va7anBWDA@mail.gmail.com">surprised me</a>
> >  with this requirement;
> >  he also kindly surprised me with
> >  <a href="https://lkml.kernel.org/g/CALCETrXSY9JpW3uE6H8WYk81sg56qasA2aqmjMPsq5dOtzso=g@mail.gmail.com">an algorithm</a>
> 
> Strange that this one still works. Anyway...
> 
> 
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

So we are confident that these links won't be fixed by the next merge
window?

							Thanx, Paul