linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, LKP ML <lkp@01.org>,
	huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 11:23:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160926182353.GA33149@jaegeuk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fuoni3cx.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 02:26:06PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> Hi, Jaegeuk,
> 
> "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> writes:
> 
> > Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> writes:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >>> Hi Jaegeuk,
> >>> 
> >>> > > >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm.  The
> >>> > > >> > steps for aim7 is,
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> > cat > workfile <<EOF
> >>> > > >> > FILESIZE: 1M
> >>> > > >> > POOLSIZE: 10M
> >>> > > >> > 10 sync_disk_rw
> >>> > > >> > EOF
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> > (
> >>> > > >> >     echo $HOSTNAME
> >>> > > >> >     echo sync_disk_rw
> >>> > > >> >
> >>> > > >> >     echo 1
> >>> > > >> >     echo 600
> >>> > > >> >     echo 2
> >>> > > >> >     echo 600
> >>> > > >> >     echo 1
> >>> > > >> > ) | ./multitask -t &
> >>> > > >>
> >>> > > >> Any update on these 2 regressions?  Is the information is enough for you
> >>> > > >> to reproduce?
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Sorry, I've had no time to dig this due to business travel now.
> >>> > > > I'll check that when back to US.
> >>> > > 
> >>> > > Any update?
> >>> > 
> >>> > Sorry, how can I get multitask binary?
> >>> 
> >>> It's part of aim7, which can be downloaded here:
> >>> 
> >>> http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/project/aimbench/aim-suite7/Initial%20release/s7110.tar.Z
> >>
> >> Thank you for the codes.
> >>
> >> I've run this workload on the latest f2fs and compared performance having
> >> without the reported patch. (1TB nvme SSD, 16 cores, 16GB DRAM)
> >> Interestingly, I could find slight performance improvement rather than
> >> regression. :(
> >> Not sure how to reproduce this.
> >
> > I think the difference lies on disk used.  The ramdisk is used in the
> > original test, but it appears that your memory is too small to setup the
> > RAM disk for test.  So it may be impossible for you to reproduce the
> > test unless you can find more memory :)
> >
> > But we can help you to root cause the issue.  What additional data do
> > you want?  perf-profile data before and after the patch?
> 
> Any update to this regression?

Sorry, no. But meanwhile, I've purchased more DRAMs. :)
Now I'm with 128GB DRAM. I can configure 64GB as pmem.
Is it worth to try the test again?

Thanks,

> 
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-26 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-18  2:09 [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.app_overhead -36.3% regression kernel test robot
2016-07-18 20:27 ` [LKP] " Huang, Ying
2016-08-04 17:00   ` [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec " Huang, Ying
2016-08-04 17:24     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-04 17:44       ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-04 18:52         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-04 20:36           ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-11 22:49             ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-12  1:22               ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-24 16:51                 ` huang ying
2016-08-27  0:52                   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-27  2:13                     ` Fengguang Wu
2016-08-30  2:30                       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-30 16:44                         ` Huang, Ying
2016-09-26  6:26                           ` Huang, Ying
2016-09-26 18:23                             ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2016-09-27  0:50                               ` Huang, Ying
2016-09-27  1:41                                 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-31  3:14                                   ` Huang, Ying
2016-10-31 17:42                                     ` Jaegeuk Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160926182353.GA33149@jaegeuk \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@01.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).