linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, LKP ML <lkp@01.org>,
	huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 09:44:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pooqnr4t.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160830023048.GA2088@jaegeuk> (Jaegeuk Kim's message of "Mon, 29 Aug 2016 19:30:48 -0700")

Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> writes:

> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 10:13:34AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>> 
>> > > >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm.  The
>> > > >> > steps for aim7 is,
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > cat > workfile <<EOF
>> > > >> > FILESIZE: 1M
>> > > >> > POOLSIZE: 10M
>> > > >> > 10 sync_disk_rw
>> > > >> > EOF
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > (
>> > > >> >     echo $HOSTNAME
>> > > >> >     echo sync_disk_rw
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >     echo 1
>> > > >> >     echo 600
>> > > >> >     echo 2
>> > > >> >     echo 600
>> > > >> >     echo 1
>> > > >> > ) | ./multitask -t &
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Any update on these 2 regressions?  Is the information is enough for you
>> > > >> to reproduce?
>> > > >
>> > > > Sorry, I've had no time to dig this due to business travel now.
>> > > > I'll check that when back to US.
>> > > 
>> > > Any update?
>> > 
>> > Sorry, how can I get multitask binary?
>> 
>> It's part of aim7, which can be downloaded here:
>> 
>> http://nchc.dl.sourceforge.net/project/aimbench/aim-suite7/Initial%20release/s7110.tar.Z
>
> Thank you for the codes.
>
> I've run this workload on the latest f2fs and compared performance having
> without the reported patch. (1TB nvme SSD, 16 cores, 16GB DRAM)
> Interestingly, I could find slight performance improvement rather than
> regression. :(
> Not sure how to reproduce this.

I think the difference lies on disk used.  The ramdisk is used in the
original test, but it appears that your memory is too small to setup the
RAM disk for test.  So it may be impossible for you to reproduce the
test unless you can find more memory :)

But we can help you to root cause the issue.  What additional data do
you want?  perf-profile data before and after the patch?

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-30 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-18  2:09 [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.app_overhead -36.3% regression kernel test robot
2016-07-18 20:27 ` [LKP] " Huang, Ying
2016-08-04 17:00   ` [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec " Huang, Ying
2016-08-04 17:24     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-04 17:44       ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-04 18:52         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-04 20:36           ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-11 22:49             ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-12  1:22               ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-24 16:51                 ` huang ying
2016-08-27  0:52                   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-27  2:13                     ` Fengguang Wu
2016-08-30  2:30                       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-30 16:44                         ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2016-09-26  6:26                           ` Huang, Ying
2016-09-26 18:23                             ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-09-27  0:50                               ` Huang, Ying
2016-09-27  1:41                                 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-31  3:14                                   ` Huang, Ying
2016-10-31 17:42                                     ` Jaegeuk Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87pooqnr4t.fsf@yhuang-mobile.sh.intel.com \
    --to=ying.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).