linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	nm@ti.com, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@kernel.org>,
	linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	robh@kernel.org, d-gerlach@ti.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/8] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple regulators per device
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 15:48:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161024224852.GQ26139@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <891ef8705e13dff331a3135647f4c18f88402a12.1476952750.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On 10/20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On certain platforms (like TI), DVFS for a single device (CPU) requires
> configuring multiple power supplies.
> 
> The OPP bindings already contains binding and example to explain this
> case, but it isn't sufficient. For example, there is no way for the code
> parsing these bindings to know which voltage values belong to which
> power supply. Also its not possible to know the order in which the
> supplies need to be configured while switching OPPs.
> 
> This patch tries to clarify on those details and does some minor changes
> as well.
> 
> Note that the bindings do not specify the order in which the regulators
> need to be programmed and the order in which the entries are added for
> the supplies.
> 
> The user of the bindings (like the kernel) shall know these details
> already and the DT is responsible to supply only the readings for the
> regulators.
> 
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-24 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-20  8:44 [PATCH V2 0/8] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:44 ` [PATCH V2 1/8] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple regulators per device Viresh Kumar
2016-10-24 22:48   ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2016-10-20  8:44 ` [PATCH V2 2/8] PM / OPP: Don't use OPP structure outside of rcu protected section Viresh Kumar
2016-10-24 22:52   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-25  3:37     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:44 ` [PATCH V2 3/8] PM / OPP: Manage supply's voltage/current in a separate structure Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:44 ` [PATCH V2 4/8] PM / OPP: Pass struct dev_pm_opp_supply to _set_opp_voltage() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-24 23:14   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-25  3:45     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 20:26       ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-26  3:34         ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:44 ` [PATCH V2 5/8] PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators Viresh Kumar
2016-10-21 22:32   ` Dave Gerlach
2016-10-24  3:35     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 16:49   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-26  6:05     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-10  1:37       ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-20  8:45 ` [PATCH V2 6/8] PM / OPP: Separate out _generic_opp_set_rate() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 18:59   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-26  6:07     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:45 ` [PATCH V2 7/8] PM / OPP: Allow platform specific custom opp_set_rate() callbacks Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 19:01   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-26  6:07     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:45 ` [PATCH V2 8/8] PM / OPP: Don't WARN on multiple calls to dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 19:01   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-21 13:39 ` [PATCH V2 0/8] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-21 15:40   ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-24  1:08     ` Dave Gerlach
2016-10-24  4:26       ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 21:13         ` Dave Gerlach
2016-10-26  3:21           ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161024224852.GQ26139@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).