linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>, Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/8] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:39:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jNJBDKq+ccHKRA6JGAOXV0qT0-k1mwAcBkCv-7JtzACw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1476952750.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some platforms (like TI) have complex DVFS configuration for CPU
> devices, where multiple regulators are required to be configured to
> change DVFS state of the device. This was explained well by Nishanth
> earlier [1].
>
> Some thoughts went into it few months back but then it all got lost. I
> am trying to get that back on track with this thread.
>
> One of the major complaints around multiple regulators case was that the
> DT isn't responsible in any way to represent the ordering in which
> multiple supplies need to be programmed, before or after frequency
> change. It was considered in this patch and such information is left to
> the platform specific OPP driver now, which can register its own
> opp_set_rate() callback with the OPP core and the OPP core will then
> call it during DVFS.
>
> The patches are tested on Exynos5250 (Dual A15). I have hacked around DT
> and code to pass values for multiple regulators and verified that they
> are all properly read by the kernel (using debugfs interface).
>
> Though more testing on real (TI) platforms would be useful.
>
> This is rebased over: linux-next branch in the PM tree.
>
> V1->V2:
> - Ack from Rob for 1st patch
> - Moved the supplies structure to pm_opp.h (Dave)
> - Fixed an compilation warning.

I need somebody from the OPP camp to review patches [2-8/8] for me.

Thanks,
Rafael

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-21 13:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-20  8:44 [PATCH V2 0/8] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:44 ` [PATCH V2 1/8] PM / OPP: Reword binding supporting multiple regulators per device Viresh Kumar
2016-10-24 22:48   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-20  8:44 ` [PATCH V2 2/8] PM / OPP: Don't use OPP structure outside of rcu protected section Viresh Kumar
2016-10-24 22:52   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-25  3:37     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:44 ` [PATCH V2 3/8] PM / OPP: Manage supply's voltage/current in a separate structure Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:44 ` [PATCH V2 4/8] PM / OPP: Pass struct dev_pm_opp_supply to _set_opp_voltage() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-24 23:14   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-25  3:45     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 20:26       ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-26  3:34         ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:44 ` [PATCH V2 5/8] PM / OPP: Add infrastructure to manage multiple regulators Viresh Kumar
2016-10-21 22:32   ` Dave Gerlach
2016-10-24  3:35     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 16:49   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-26  6:05     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-11-10  1:37       ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-20  8:45 ` [PATCH V2 6/8] PM / OPP: Separate out _generic_opp_set_rate() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 18:59   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-26  6:07     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:45 ` [PATCH V2 7/8] PM / OPP: Allow platform specific custom opp_set_rate() callbacks Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 19:01   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-26  6:07     ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-20  8:45 ` [PATCH V2 8/8] PM / OPP: Don't WARN on multiple calls to dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 19:01   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-21 13:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-10-21 15:40   ` [PATCH V2 0/8] PM / OPP: Multiple regulator support Viresh Kumar
2016-10-24  1:08     ` Dave Gerlach
2016-10-24  4:26       ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-25 21:13         ` Dave Gerlach
2016-10-26  3:21           ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0jNJBDKq+ccHKRA6JGAOXV0qT0-k1mwAcBkCv-7JtzACw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).