From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
John Dias <joaodias@google.com>,
"open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] mm: defer vmalloc from atomic context
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:09:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161107150947.GA11279@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a40cccff-3a6e-b0be-5d06-bac6cdb0e1e6@virtuozzo.com>
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:01:45PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> > So because in_atomic doesn't work for !CONFIG_PREEMPT kernels, can we
> > always defer the work in these cases?
> >
> > So for non-preemptible kernels, we always defer:
> >
> > if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT) || in_atomic()) {
> > // defer
> > }
> >
> > Is this fine? Or any other ideas?
> >
>
> What's wrong with my idea?
> We can add vfree_in_atomic() and use it to free vmapped stacks
> and for any other places where vfree() used 'in_atomict() && !in_interrupt()' context.
I somehow missed the mail, sorry. That beeing said always defer is
going to suck badly in terms of performance, so I'm not sure it's an all
that good idea.
vfree_in_atomic sounds good, but I wonder if we'll need to annotate
more callers than just the stacks. I'm fairly bust this week, do you
want to give that a spin? Otherwise I'll give it a try towards the
end of this week or next week.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-07 15:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-22 15:17 reduce latency in __purge_vmap_area_lazy Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-22 15:17 ` [PATCH 1/7] mm: remove free_unmap_vmap_area_noflush Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-22 15:17 ` [PATCH 2/7] mm: remove free_unmap_vmap_area_addr Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-22 15:17 ` [PATCH 3/7] mm: refactor __purge_vmap_area_lazy Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-22 15:17 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm: defer vmalloc from atomic context Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-24 15:44 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-11-05 3:43 ` Joel Fernandes
2016-11-07 15:01 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-11-07 15:09 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-11-08 15:03 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2016-11-08 15:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/vmalloc: add vfree_atomic() Andrey Ryabinin
2016-11-08 15:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] kernel/fork: use vfree_atomic() to free thread stack Andrey Ryabinin
2016-11-08 15:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/ldt: use vfree_atomic() to free ldt entries Andrey Ryabinin
2016-11-07 16:50 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm: defer vmalloc from atomic context Joel Fernandes
2016-10-22 15:17 ` [PATCH 5/7] mm: mark all calls into the vmalloc subsystem as potentially sleeping Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-22 15:17 ` [PATCH 6/7] mm: turn vmap_purge_lock into a mutex Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-22 15:17 ` [PATCH 7/7] mm: add preempt points into __purge_vmap_area_lazy Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161107150947.GA11279@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=joaodias@google.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).