linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/2] [net-next] udp: provide udp{4,6}_lib_lookup for nf_socket_ipv{4,6}
@ 2016-11-08 13:28 Arnd Bergmann
  2016-11-08 13:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] [nf-next] netfilter: fix NF_REPEAT handling Arnd Bergmann
  2016-11-09 23:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] [net-next] udp: provide udp{4,6}_lib_lookup for nf_socket_ipv{4,6} Pablo Neira Ayuso
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-11-08 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David S. Miller
  Cc: netfilter-devel, coreteam, Pablo Neira Ayuso, netdev,
	Arnd Bergmann, Alexey Kuznetsov, James Morris, Hideaki YOSHIFUJI,
	Patrick McHardy, Eric Dumazet, linux-kernel

Since commit ca065d0cf80f ("udp: no longer use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU")
the udp6_lib_lookup and udp4_lib_lookup functions are only
provided when it is actually possible to call them.

However, moving the callers now caused a link error:

net/built-in.o: In function `nf_sk_lookup_slow_v6':
(.text+0x131a39): undefined reference to `udp6_lib_lookup'
net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_socket_ipv4.o: In function `nf_sk_lookup_slow_v4':
nf_socket_ipv4.c:(.text.nf_sk_lookup_slow_v4+0x114): undefined reference to `udp4_lib_lookup'

This extends the #ifdef so we also provide the functions when
CONFIG_NF_SOCKET_IPV4 or CONFIG_NF_SOCKET_IPV6, respectively
are set.

Fixes: 8db4c5be88f6 ("netfilter: move socket lookup infrastructure to nf_socket_ipv{4,6}.c")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
The build failure came from the netfilter tree but is now
present in net-next, so if the solution is correct, this
patch can be applied there.
---
 net/ipv4/udp.c | 3 ++-
 net/ipv6/udp.c | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index 097b70628631..c827e4ea509e 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -580,7 +580,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(udp4_lib_lookup_skb);
  * Does increment socket refcount.
  */
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_SOCKET) || \
-    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TPROXY)
+    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TPROXY) || \
+    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_SOCKET_IPV4)
 struct sock *udp4_lib_lookup(struct net *net, __be32 saddr, __be16 sport,
 			     __be32 daddr, __be16 dport, int dif)
 {
diff --git a/net/ipv6/udp.c b/net/ipv6/udp.c
index 5313818b7485..86a8cacd333b 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/udp.c
@@ -302,7 +302,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(udp6_lib_lookup_skb);
  * Does increment socket refcount.
  */
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_SOCKET) || \
-    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TPROXY)
+    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_TPROXY) || \
+    IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_SOCKET_IPV6)
 struct sock *udp6_lib_lookup(struct net *net, const struct in6_addr *saddr, __be16 sport,
 			     const struct in6_addr *daddr, __be16 dport, int dif)
 {
-- 
2.9.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] [nf-next] netfilter: fix NF_REPEAT handling
  2016-11-08 13:28 [PATCH 1/2] [net-next] udp: provide udp{4,6}_lib_lookup for nf_socket_ipv{4,6} Arnd Bergmann
@ 2016-11-08 13:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
  2016-11-09 23:15   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
  2016-11-09 23:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] [net-next] udp: provide udp{4,6}_lib_lookup for nf_socket_ipv{4,6} Pablo Neira Ayuso
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2016-11-08 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pablo Neira Ayuso
  Cc: netfilter-devel, coreteam, netdev, Arnd Bergmann,
	Patrick McHardy, Jozsef Kadlecsik, David S. Miller,
	Florian Westphal, Eric Dumazet, linux-kernel

gcc correctly identified a theoretical uninitialized variable use:

net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c: In function 'nf_conntrack_in':
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:1125:14: error: 'l4proto' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

This could only happen when we 'goto out' before looking up l4proto,
and then enter the retry, implying that l3proto->get_l4proto()
returned NF_REPEAT. This does not currently get returned in any
code path and probably won't ever happen, but is not good to
rely on.

Moving the repeat handling up a little should have the same
behavior as today but avoids the warning by making that case
impossible to enter.

Fixes: 08733a0cb7de ("netfilter: handle NF_REPEAT from nf_conntrack_in()")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
The patch causing this is currently only in nf-next, and not yet
in net-next.
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index de4b8a75f30b..610c9de0ce18 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -1337,6 +1337,8 @@ nf_conntrack_in(struct net *net, u_int8_t pf, unsigned int hooknum,
 		NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(net, invalid);
 		if (ret == -NF_DROP)
 			NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(net, drop);
+		if (ret == -NF_REPEAT && tmpl)
+			goto repeat;
 		ret = -ret;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -1349,10 +1351,7 @@ nf_conntrack_in(struct net *net, u_int8_t pf, unsigned int hooknum,
 		 * closed/aborted connection. We have to go back and create a
 		 * fresh conntrack.
 		 */
-		if (ret == NF_REPEAT)
-			goto repeat;
-		else
-			nf_ct_put(tmpl);
+		nf_ct_put(tmpl);
 	}
 
 	return ret;
-- 
2.9.0

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] [net-next] udp: provide udp{4,6}_lib_lookup for nf_socket_ipv{4,6}
  2016-11-08 13:28 [PATCH 1/2] [net-next] udp: provide udp{4,6}_lib_lookup for nf_socket_ipv{4,6} Arnd Bergmann
  2016-11-08 13:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] [nf-next] netfilter: fix NF_REPEAT handling Arnd Bergmann
@ 2016-11-09 23:08 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2016-11-09 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: David S. Miller, netfilter-devel, coreteam, netdev,
	Alexey Kuznetsov, James Morris, Hideaki YOSHIFUJI,
	Patrick McHardy, Eric Dumazet, linux-kernel

On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:28:18PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Since commit ca065d0cf80f ("udp: no longer use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU")
> the udp6_lib_lookup and udp4_lib_lookup functions are only
> provided when it is actually possible to call them.
> 
> However, moving the callers now caused a link error:
> 
> net/built-in.o: In function `nf_sk_lookup_slow_v6':
> (.text+0x131a39): undefined reference to `udp6_lib_lookup'
> net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_socket_ipv4.o: In function `nf_sk_lookup_slow_v4':
> nf_socket_ipv4.c:(.text.nf_sk_lookup_slow_v4+0x114): undefined reference to `udp4_lib_lookup'
> 
> This extends the #ifdef so we also provide the functions when
> CONFIG_NF_SOCKET_IPV4 or CONFIG_NF_SOCKET_IPV6, respectively
> are set.

Applied, thanks Arnd!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] [nf-next] netfilter: fix NF_REPEAT handling
  2016-11-08 13:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] [nf-next] netfilter: fix NF_REPEAT handling Arnd Bergmann
@ 2016-11-09 23:15   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2016-11-09 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnd Bergmann
  Cc: netfilter-devel, coreteam, netdev, Patrick McHardy,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik, David S. Miller, Florian Westphal,
	Eric Dumazet, linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2250 bytes --]

On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:28:19PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc correctly identified a theoretical uninitialized variable use:
> 
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c: In function 'nf_conntrack_in':
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c:1125:14: error: 'l4proto' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> 
> This could only happen when we 'goto out' before looking up l4proto,
> and then enter the retry, implying that l3proto->get_l4proto()
> returned NF_REPEAT. This does not currently get returned in any
> code path and probably won't ever happen, but is not good to
> rely on.
> 
> Moving the repeat handling up a little should have the same
> behavior as today but avoids the warning by making that case
> impossible to enter.
> 
> Fixes: 08733a0cb7de ("netfilter: handle NF_REPEAT from nf_conntrack_in()")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> The patch causing this is currently only in nf-next, and not yet
> in net-next.
> ---
>  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> index de4b8a75f30b..610c9de0ce18 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
> @@ -1337,6 +1337,8 @@ nf_conntrack_in(struct net *net, u_int8_t pf, unsigned int hooknum,
>  		NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(net, invalid);
>  		if (ret == -NF_DROP)
>  			NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(net, drop);
> +		if (ret == -NF_REPEAT && tmpl)
> +			goto repeat;

This is my fault, I'm going to mangle this patch since 08733a0cb7de
really broke the NF_REPEAT handling. We should inconditionally jump
back to repeat if we get NF_REPEAT, no matter if the template is set
or not. I'll include a side node on this mangling.

>  		ret = -ret;
>  		goto out;
>  	}
> @@ -1349,10 +1351,7 @@ nf_conntrack_in(struct net *net, u_int8_t pf, unsigned int hooknum,
>  		 * closed/aborted connection. We have to go back and create a
>  		 * fresh conntrack.
>  		 */

I'm going to move the comment above on top of the NF_REPEAT check, so
it still keeps around as context.

BTW, the revamped patch looks like the one attached.

Thanks a lot for addressing this fallout.

[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1140 bytes --]

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index de4b8a75f30b..e9ffe33dc0ca 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -1337,6 +1337,12 @@ nf_conntrack_in(struct net *net, u_int8_t pf, unsigned int hooknum,
 		NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(net, invalid);
 		if (ret == -NF_DROP)
 			NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(net, drop);
+		/* Special case: TCP tracker reports an attempt to reopen a
+		 * closed/aborted connection. We have to go back and create a
+		 * fresh conntrack.
+		 */
+		if (ret == -NF_REPEAT)
+			goto repeat;
 		ret = -ret;
 		goto out;
 	}
@@ -1344,16 +1350,8 @@ nf_conntrack_in(struct net *net, u_int8_t pf, unsigned int hooknum,
 	if (set_reply && !test_and_set_bit(IPS_SEEN_REPLY_BIT, &ct->status))
 		nf_conntrack_event_cache(IPCT_REPLY, ct);
 out:
-	if (tmpl) {
-		/* Special case: TCP tracker reports an attempt to reopen a
-		 * closed/aborted connection. We have to go back and create a
-		 * fresh conntrack.
-		 */
-		if (ret == NF_REPEAT)
-			goto repeat;
-		else
-			nf_ct_put(tmpl);
-	}
+	if (tmpl)
+		nf_ct_put(tmpl);
 
 	return ret;
 }

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-11-09 23:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-11-08 13:28 [PATCH 1/2] [net-next] udp: provide udp{4,6}_lib_lookup for nf_socket_ipv{4,6} Arnd Bergmann
2016-11-08 13:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] [nf-next] netfilter: fix NF_REPEAT handling Arnd Bergmann
2016-11-09 23:15   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-11-09 23:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] [net-next] udp: provide udp{4,6}_lib_lookup for nf_socket_ipv{4,6} Pablo Neira Ayuso

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).